Arrest, Detention, and Provisional Release
In: Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Courts and the European Court of Human Rights, S. 597-648
75 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Courts and the European Court of Human Rights, S. 597-648
SSRN
Working paper
In: In: R. Majovi, A. Atogho, J. Fomété, and C. Majinge (eds.), Essays in Honour of Adama Dieng, The Hague: Koninklijke Brill N.V. 2014 Forthcoming
SSRN
In: Harvard international law journal, Band 44, Heft 2, S. 577-595
ISSN: 0017-8063
World Affairs Online
In: Human rights law review, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 353-374
ISSN: 1744-1021
In: Commentaire du Statut de la Cour Pénale Internationale, Pédone, 2012.
SSRN
In: Virginia Journal of International Law, Band 17, Heft 495
SSRN
In: Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: International law reports, Band 73, S. 669-670
ISSN: 2633-707X
The individual in international law — Extradition — Procedure — Provisional arrest by authorities in requested State — Cancellation of arrest warrant by judge in requesting State whilst extradition request still maintained by authorities in that State — Provisional release pending clarification — The law of the Ivory Coast
In: International law reports, Band 73, S. 665-669
ISSN: 2633-707X
665The individual in international law — Extradition — Procedure — Provisional arrest on basis of warrant issued in requesting State — Whether application for provisional release admissible in requested State — Law on Extradition of Foreign Wrongdoers 1870, Article 4 — European Convention on Extradition, 1957, Article 16 (1) — The law of Luxembourg
Ce billet évoque les premières libérations avant jugement intervenues devant la Cour pénale internationale (octobre 2014). Après avoir été soumis à un comité de lecture, il a été publié sur le 'blogue' de la Clinique de droit international pénal et humanitaire de l'Université de Laval. ; Peer reviewed
BASE
In: The Pakistan development review: PDR, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 67-77
The field enumeration for the purposes of the Second
Population Census of Pakistan was completed at dawn of February 1, 1961.
The first Bulletin with provisional results is dated 27 days later1. The
less than five weeks in the case of Pakistan compare with about four
weeks in the case of the latest Census of India 2, and just over six
weeks in the case of United Kingdom3. Such figures are seldom directly
comparable, but the least that can be said is that Pakistan is in the
first league. With such standards of performance as to speed already
reached, the need now is to concentrate on increasing the extent of
information provided, ensuring greater comparability, providing some
preliminary analysis and elucidation and finally eliminating clerical
mistakes through more checking. The swift results in Pakistan in the
prevailing communication and literacy circumstances suggest that the
work was well planned and must have been carried out by an exceedingly
efficient organisation.
• The figures in this release show a decline in overall learner numbers between 2010/11 and 2011/12 (continuing since 2005/06) but with variations between the individual sectors and age groups. • In 2011/12 there were 226,575 distinct learners at FE Institutions, Community Learning (CL) or Work-based Learning (WBL) providers, 5.7 per cent lower than in 2010/11. • Total numbers at FE institutions fell by 4.4 per cent, with full-time learner numbers almost unchanged (0.2 per cent fall) and part-time learner numbers at FEIs 5.2 per cent lower. • Learners in local authority community learning fell by 10 per cent, relative to 2010/11. • For WBL provision, learner numbers on a full year basis fell by 6.4 per cent though the number of trainees in learning on the last day of the year was 6.2 per cent higher than at 31 July 2011 (partly because of day of week effects), the latter date having immediately preceded a change in the structure of Welsh Government support to WBL providers.
BASE
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 58, Heft 6, S. 1147-1166
ISSN: 1930-6571
On May 25, 2019, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) issued a provisional measures order to the Russian Federation to release two Ukrainian warships, a naval auxiliary ship, and their servicemen. This case adds to the jurisprudence concerning the Tribunal's institutional authority to issue a provisional measures order under Article 290(5) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).