The Plurality of Evil ; Pluralnost zla
The author discusses the political implications of the sovereignty of evil, which is the core concept introduced by Derek Edyvane is his forthcoming book Civic Virtue and the Sovereignty of Evil. The author's main argument is that citizens would have a hard time achieving a consensus on the preventive politics worth pursuing without first reaching an agreement regarding the evil they are trying to prevent. The problem is that the concept of sovereign evil is plural in its nature and, therefore, leads to new conflicts, rather than to a consensus among citizens. The article tries to identify instances in which a competing understanding of this concept might arise, and concludes by arguing that the model of preventive politics requires more that mere recognition of sovereign evil to become politically viable. ; Autor raspravlja o političkim implikacijama suverenosti zla, središnjeg koncepta koji Derek Edyvane uvodi u svojoj knjizi Civic Virtue and The Sovereignty of Evil. Autorov je glavni argument da građani teško mogu postići konsenzus oko preventivne politike koju žele slijediti a da ne postignu dogovor oko zla koje žele spriječiti. Problem je u tome što je koncept zla po svojoj prirodi pluralan i stoga vodi novim sukobima, a ne konsenzusu između građana. Članak pokušava identificirati one instance u kojima suprotstavljena shvaćanja ovoga koncepta mogu isplivati, te zaključuje tvrdeći kako model preventivne politike zahtijeva više od same ideje suverenog zla da bi postao politički relevantan.