Suchergebnisse

The question concerning whether the formation of interinstitutional arrangements, especially those formed within the Common Foreign & Security Policy, have facilitated processes of parliamentarization within the European Union is addressed. An overview of the legal foundations & limitations of interinstitutional arrangements is presented, emphasizing how these cooperative devices are not easily located within existing European legal frameworks. Intergovernmentalist, neo-institutionalist, & structurationist approaches to understanding constitutional development within the European Union are subsequently discussed to better comprehend the role in interinstitutional arrangements within the European constitution. Analysis of the treaties of Amsterdam, Maastricht, & Nice is performed to determine how the competencies of the European Parliament were enlarged during the 1990s. Additional attention is dedicated to reviewing the establishment of interinstitutional arrangements in 1997 regarding the financing of the Common Foreign and Security Policy & explaining how these agreements enhanced the European Parliament's power within regional foreign & security policy. Various recommendations for future research are also offered. J. W. Parker

The article presents the effects of an attempt to ascertain to what extent the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register affects the phenomenon of lobbying in the European Union (EU). In order to examine the issue, the concept and essence of lobbying in the EU were introduced. Legal regulations concerning EU lobbying were also identified. A further portion of the article analyses the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 May 2021 between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and the European Commission on a mandatory transparency register (IAMTR) in relation to the previously binding Agreement between the Parliament and the European Commission on the transparency register for organisations and self-employed individuals in EU Policy-making and Policy implementation (ATR). The article uses the formal-dogmatic method. As a result of the analysis, it was concluded that the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register
contains numerous exclusions, both subjective and objective, to registration in the Transparency Register. One positive aspect is the application of the IAMTR to the EU Council also.

The article presents the effects of an attempt to ascertain to what extent the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register affects the phenomenon of lobbying in the European Union (EU). In order to examine the issue, the concept and essence of lobbying in the EU were introduced. Legal regulations concerning EU lobbying were also identified. A further portion of the article analyses the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 May 2021 between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and the European Commission on a mandatory transparency register (IAMTR) in relation to the previously binding Agreement between the Parliament and the European Commission on the transparency register for organisations and self-employed individuals in EU Policy-making and Policy implementation (ATR). The article uses the formal-dogmatic method. As a result of the analysis, it was concluded that the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register contains numerous exclusions, both subjective and objective, to registration in the Transparency Register. One positive aspect is the application of the IAMTR to the EU Council also.

We recently welcomed Camila Villard Duran to eu!radio! She is a law professor at ESSCA School of Management, based in Angers, France. She spoke in defence of the trade agreement between the European Union and Mercosur.
The post In defence of the EU-Mercosur trade agreement appeared first on Ideas on Europe.