Suchergebnisse
Filter
240 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
Is There a Green Premium for Green Bond Issuance? Evidence from China
In: FINANA-D-22-00866
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
The Green Premium: Environmental Regulation, Environmental Risk and Property Value
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 87, Heft 5, S. 1061-1096
ISSN: 1573-1502
Green Premium Evidence from Climatic Areas: A Case in Southern Europe, Alicante (Spain)
The existence of a green premium in house (asking) prices in Alicante province, Spain, are analyzed using circa 9000 property observations. In developing the sample, information from energy efficiency certificates was matched with two other databases. The model tests for green premium by climatic zones using pool Ordinary Least Squares (pool-OLS) and Instrumental Variables (IV) hedonic models, adds new knowledge concerning the existence of green premiums from Southern Europe, explores differences in their estimation by climatic zone, debates the nature of the estimated green parameters, and explains the role of endogeneity in hedonic green premium models. The empirical evidence assesses the sensitivity of asking price to either energy consumption (KWh) or carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) with an apparent premium of 3%, and captures an association with efficiency rating from G to F of 1.8% and from F to E of 1.1%. Significantly, the results relating to price responses show a distinct variation between the coast and the cooler climatic zone of the interior. The paper shows that energy efficiency incentive policies should discriminate by climatic areas, and provides a price reference by which to assess the amount of incentives needed to achieve European Union (EU) objectives.
BASE
Green Premium Evidence from Climatic Areas: A Case in Southern Europe, Alicante (Spain)
The existence of a green premium in house (asking) prices in Alicante province, Spain, are analyzed using circa 9000 property observations. In developing the sample, information from energy efficiency certificates was matched with two other databases. The model tests for green premium by climatic zones using pool Ordinary Least Squares (pool-OLS) and Instrumental Variables (IV) hedonic models, adds new knowledge concerning the existence of green premiums from Southern Europe, explores differences in their estimation by climatic zone, debates the nature of the estimated green parameters, and explains the role of endogeneity in hedonic green premium models. The empirical evidence assesses the sensitivity of asking price to either energy consumption (KWh) or carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) with an apparent premium of 3%, and captures an association with efficiency rating from G to F of 1.8% and from F to E of 1.1%. Significantly, the results relating to price responses show a distinct variation between the coast and the cooler climatic zone of the interior. The paper shows that energy efficiency incentive policies should discriminate by climatic areas, and provides a price reference by which to assess the amount of incentives needed to achieve European Union (EU) objectives. ; This work was supported by the project RentalCal (http://www.rentalcal.eu/) funded by the European Union within the framework of H2020-EE-2014-2015: H2020-EE-2014-3-MarketUptake.
BASE
The optimal subsidy scheme and technology innovation strategy considering consumers' green premium
In: Asia Pacific journal of marketing and logistics, Band 34, Heft 8, S. 1573-1595
ISSN: 1758-4248
PurposeThis paper investigates how a regulator pursuing social welfare maximization designs an optimal subsidy scheme to stimulate technology innovation in the presence of a consumer green premium. Specifically, the authors solve the following questions: (1) Does the consumers' green premium affect the design of the subsidy scheme? (2) How should the firm choose a green technology innovation strategy under the optimal subsidy scheme? (3) Does technology innovation bring higher social welfare and lower environmental impact?Design/methodology/approachThe authors first develop a game model to explore the impact of subsidy schemes on social welfare without considering technology innovation. Then the authors investigate two innovation strategies, in-house innovation and external introduction, under the optimal subsidy scheme. Finally, they illustrate the optimal choices of innovation strategy for the firm, consumers and regulators.FindingsThe results reveal that the subsidy scheme will not always increase social welfare, which depends on the environmental improvement coefficient of the unit green level. The optimal subsidy level increases with the green premium, but it is not related to the size of the consumer green segment. Moreover, the success rate of in-house innovation will raise the optimal green level, but the company benefits from an increased success rate of in-house innovation only when the green segment is large enough. The green segment size and external green level jointly determine the choice of technology innovation strategy.Originality/valueThis research is the first to analyze this problem while considering the green demand and subsidy scheme simultaneously as drivers of a firm's technology innovation, thereby providing new managerial implications for decisions by the regulator and firms.
Green premium evidence from climatic areas: A case in Southern Europe, Alicante (Spain)
The existence of a green premium in house (asking) prices in Alicante province, Spain, are analyzed using circa 9000 property observations. In developing the sample, information from energy efficiency certificates was matched with two other databases. The model tests for green premium by climatic zones using pool Ordinary Least Squares (pool-OLS) and Instrumental Variables (IV) hedonic models, adds new knowledge concerning the existence of green premiums from Southern Europe, explores differences in their estimation by climatic zone, debates the nature of the estimated green parameters, and explains the role of endogeneity in hedonic green premium models. The empirical evidence assesses the sensitivity of asking price to either energy consumption (KWh) or carbon dioxide emissions (CO 2 ) with an apparent premium of 3%, and captures an association with efficiency rating from G to F of 1.8% and from F to E of 1.1%. Significantly, the results relating to price responses show a distinct variation between the coast and the cooler climatic zone of the interior. The paper shows that energy efficiency incentive policies should discriminate by climatic areas, and provides a price reference by which to assess the amount of incentives needed to achieve European Union (EU) objectives. © 2019 by the authors.
BASE
Searching for the Green Premium: A Study of the MDB Bond Market
SSRN
Does Heterogeneous Media Sentiment Matter the 'Green Premium'? An Empirical Evidence from the Chinese Bond Market
In: IREF-D-23-00474
SSRN
(In)-Credibly Green: Which Bonds Trade at a Green Bond Premium?
In: Proceedings of Paris December 2019 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI - ESSEC
SSRN
Do private rental tenants pay for energy efficiency?: The dynamics of green premiums and brown discounts
In: Journal of property research, Band 41, Heft 3, S. 251-275
ISSN: 1466-4453