Small Farms Restructuring in Bulgaria
In: Rural Areas and Development, Band 11, Heft 2657-4403
329 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Rural Areas and Development, Band 11, Heft 2657-4403
SSRN
In: IAMO policy brief issue no. 36 (March 2019)
After two and a half decades of state-mandated cotton production, the diversification of agriculture and the downsizing of the cotton area have become prominent features of Uzbekistan's current modernization strategy. Given the momentum of agricultural policy reform, this policy brief aims to evaluate the success of farm restructuring so far. Moreover, it asks what policymakers should do next to promote agricultural competitiveness without losing sight of the social consequences of reform. After initial downsizing of the former collective farms and achieving nominal self-sufficiency in grain during the 1990s, the government has struggled to find a new model for its farming sector. In January 2019, the government initiated a new wave of farm consolidation. Rather than targeting at a particular type or size of farm organization, policymakers are recommended to focus instead on ensuring that all farmers receive undistorted market signals and have access to an optimal set of supporting public services. Stepwise liberalization of output and factor markets will contribute to this goal, and it needs to be complemented by better tailored public services to Uzbekistan's heterogeneous farming sector to lead to a successful agricultural transformation. The latter is especially important for household producers who will likely appreciate better non-farm income opportunities generated by reforms that go beyond the agricultural sector.
After two and a half decades of state-mandated cotton production, the diversification of agriculture and the downsizing of the cotton area have become prominent features of Uzbekistan's current modernization strategy. Given the momentum of agricultural policy reform, this policy brief aims to evaluate the success of farm restructuring so far. Moreover, it asks what policymakers should do next to promote agricultural competitiveness without losing sight of the social consequences of reform. After initial downsizing of the former collective farms and achieving nominal self-sufficiency in grain during the 1990s, the government has struggled to find a new model for its farming sector. In January 2019, the government initiated a new wave of farm consolidation. Rather than targeting at a particular type or size of farm organization, policymakers are recommended to focus instead on ensuring that all farmers receive undistorted market signals and have access to an optimal set of supporting public services. Stepwise liberalization of output and factor markets will contribute to this goal, and it needs to be complemented by better tailored public services to Uzbekistan's heterogeneous farming sector to lead to a successful agricultural transformation. The latter is especially important for household producers who will likely appreciate better non-farm income opportunities generated by reforms that go beyond the agricultural sector.
BASE
In: Problems of post-communism, Band 46, Heft 3, S. 42-55
ISSN: 1075-8216
Analyzes changes in land ownership and farming structures in the reorganization from collective to private farms, from independence to Spring 1996. Included in a collection of articles under the overall title "Privatization: irregular and stalled".
In: World Bank technical paper no.454
In: Europe and Central Asia environmentally and socially sustainable development series
In: Problems of post-communism, Band 46, Heft 3, S. 42-55
ISSN: 1557-783X
In: The soviet and post-soviet review, Band 21, Heft 2-3, S. 319-335
ISSN: 1075-1262
Gegenstand der Untersuchung ist die Transformation im Agrarbereich in Polen, Ungarn, der Tschechischen und der Slowakischen Republik, Rumänien und Bulgarien. Die Verfasserin gibt zunächst einen Überblick über die Agrarstruktur in diesen Ländern in der Ära des Staatssozialismus. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird eine vergleichende Analyse der Privatisierungsgesetzgebung in drei Bereichen vorgelegt: Rückgabe enteigneten Grundbesitzes, Strukturreform der Agrargenossenschaften, Privatisierung staatlicher Agrarbetriebe. Die Untersuchung zeigt, daß nur Rumänien und Bulgarien einen radikalen Wandel im Agrarbereich vollzogen haben. Gerade hier wird das Fehlen geeigneter institutioneller Rahmenbedingungen besonders deutlich. Hierzu zählen ein Markt für Grund und Boden, Agrarkreditinstitutionen, die Bildung neuer Genossenschaften, neue Vermarktungswege, die Privatisierung der Getreidelagerung, die Verfügbarkeit von Marktinformationen sowie die Verfügbarkeit von Beratungsdienstleistungen. (BIOst-Wpt)
World Affairs Online
In: The soviet and post-soviet review, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 319-335
ISSN: 1876-3324
In: World Bank technical paper 459
In: Europe and Central Asia environmentally and socially sustainable development series
World Affairs Online
In: World Bank discussion papers 233
In: Central Asian survey, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 539-560
ISSN: 1465-3354
In: World Bank Technical Paper, 500
In: Europe and Central Asia Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Series
World Affairs Online
In: Central Asian survey, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 539-560
ISSN: 0263-4937