Deconstructing the Administrative State
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 81, Heft 3, S. 767-789
ISSN: 1468-2508
945604 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 81, Heft 3, S. 767-789
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: Journal of sociology & social welfare, Band 50, Heft 2
ISSN: 1949-7652
In: Boston University Law Review, Band 101, Heft 2
SSRN
In: Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-35
SSRN
Working paper
In: Social philosophy & policy, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 1-5
ISSN: 1471-6437
AbstractThere has always been a tension, in theory, between the public accountability and the professional efficiency of the agencies of the administrative state. How has that tension been handled? What would it be like for it to be well handled?
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 63, Heft 4, S. 418-427
ISSN: 1540-6210
Over the years, the public administration literature has generated many different strands in the definition and conceptualization of citizenship. In theory and in practice, our understanding of what it means to be a citizen is in danger of being muddled amid the diversity of perspectives and the epistemological confusion generated in the contemporary discourse on the subject. My aim in this article is to clarify and elaborate a common thread that runs through our contemporary understanding of citizenship and to advance the general thesis that our brand of theorizing reflects an earlier tradition that embodies the conservative ethos of Aristotelian republicanism. Can such a tradition survive in modern American society?
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 63, Heft 4, S. 418-427
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: South Texas Law Review, Band 51, Heft 2
SSRN
In: Routledge/EUI Studies in the Political Economy of the Welfare State; Immigration and Welfare
In: Administrative Science Quarterly, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 265
In: Midwest journal of political science: publication of the Midwest Political Science Association, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 235
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 203
ISSN: 1540-6210
State Administrative Courts is a judicial body that has absolute competence to examine and resolve disputes in the field of state administration. The development of State Administrative Courts (Peratun) jurisprudence is indispensable for the development of state administrative law. The problems studied are the role of jurisprudence in the field of state administrative law and the role of State Administrative Courts in providing access to justice. This research is a normative legal research where primary and secondary legal materials are analyzed qualitatively. The Supreme Court has made efforts to strengthen jurisprudence so that it can support thedevelopment of administrative law. Judges' decisions are needed as a source of law. This is because it comes from dynamic legal dispute resolution. Then, jurisprudence can bring about social change for society. The process of making judges' decisions is also faster than the process of drafting laws. The broader absolute competence of State Administrative Courts can provide easy access to justice where the public can file complaints against factual actions of the Government in the field of public law. Jurisprudence as a source of law is indispensable for developing state administrative law by taking into account the development of society, social conditions, legal and political conditions. Jurisprudence produces general principles of good governance so that it can be used for the administration of government wisely.
BASE
In: U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 24-07
SSRN