International Capital Movements
In: The Economic Journal, Band 98, Heft 391, S. 542
7667 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Economic Journal, Band 98, Heft 391, S. 542
In: Economica, Band 55, Heft 220, S. 558
In: Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta: naučnyj recenziruemyj žurnal = MGIMO review of international relations : scientific peer-reviewed journal, Heft 4(49), S. 274-285
ISSN: 2541-9099
Japan, the largest net exporter of investment plays one of key roles in the in-ternational capital flows and has a serious impact on the global trends in this important dimension of international economic relations. Vast amounts of for-eign direct investment (FDI) outflow are important for the Japanese national economy as well, since Japanese overseas production in some areas reaches 40% and is an important part of its industrial potential. However, FDI inflow remains low, indicating an unbalanced participation of Japan in the international capital flows. Japan in international capital flows presents a field for complex numerous research. This article concentrates on analysis of dynamics and geographical structure of capital flows, reveal the trends, and estimate the effect of Abenomics.
In: Scottish journal of political economy: the journal of the Scottish Economic Society, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 136-159
ISSN: 1467-9485
In: NBER macroeconomics annual, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 73-116
ISSN: 1537-2642
In: NBER macroeconomics annual, Band 16, S. 73-116
ISSN: 1537-2642
In: Rajah Rasiah (2000) "Globalization and International Private Capital Movements", Third World Quarterly, 21(6): 943-961.
SSRN
In: Third world quarterly, Band 21, Heft 6, S. 943-961
ISSN: 0143-6597
This paper examines the power topography of international private capital movements with specific reference to FDI & portfolio equity flows. A number of important development conclusions emerge from the paper. There exists little relationship between incomes & levels of FDI participation, although developed & resource-endowed economies have received greater inflows. While greater liberalization from the mid-1980s has stimulated the explosive growth of portfolio equity capital flows, it has also exposed developing economies to serious systemic risks. Contrary to neoliberal arguments, developing economies that have managed to utilize FDI effectively & to prevent systemic volatility generated from portfolio capital movements from seriously destabilizing them, have generally relied on effective governments. Intercountry economic development has become increasingly unequal in the period 1980-97. While the material conditions of the majority of developing economies have improved, those located in Africa & South Asia in particular have remained seriously disadvantaged. 5 Tables. Adapted from the source document.
World Affairs Online
In: NBER macroeconomics annual, Band 16, S. 134-136
ISSN: 1537-2642
In: Mirovaja ėkonomika i meždunarodnye otnošenija: MĖMO, Heft 1, S. 3-16
In: An Introduction to International Macroeconomics, S. 35-45
In: NBER macroeconomics annual, Band 16, S. 127-134
ISSN: 1537-2642
In: Third world quarterly, Band 21, Heft 6, S. 943-961
ISSN: 1360-2241