Is the Road to Hell Paved with Good Intentions? An Empirical Analysis of Budgetary Follow-Up in the EU
In: EEREV-D-22-00360
19047 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: EEREV-D-22-00360
SSRN
In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP17154
SSRN
Of the 14 recommendations contained in the May 2005 report, 5 have been implemented, 1 was found to be not applicable, and the remaining have not been implemented.
BASE
In: Nonprofit communications report: monthly communications ideas for nonprofits, Band 21, Heft 12, S. 8-8
ISSN: 2325-8616
In: Nonprofit communications report: monthly communications ideas for nonprofits, Band 16, Heft 10, S. 3-3
ISSN: 2325-8616
SSRN
In: Middle East international: MEI, Band 539, S. 9
ISSN: 0047-7249
In: The major gifts report: monthly ideas to unlock your major gifts potential, Band 22, Heft 11, S. 8-8
ISSN: 2325-8608
In: The major gifts report: monthly ideas to unlock your major gifts potential, Band 22, Heft 6, S. 8-8
ISSN: 2325-8608
In: The major gifts report: monthly ideas to unlock your major gifts potential, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 7-7
ISSN: 2325-8608
In: Strengthening Integrity and Fighting Corruption in Education, S. 87-95
This follow-up report by the Legislative Audit Council reviews the State Ports Authority (SPA). The audit objectives primarily focused on reviewing plans for port expansion and reviewing the SPA's operational efficiency.
BASE
In: Vereinte Nationen: Zeitschrift für die Vereinten Nationen und ihre Sonderorganisationen, Band 58, Heft 6, S. 249-254
ISSN: 0042-384X
The report of the UN Fact Finding Mission headed by Richard Goldstone on the Gaza War of 2008/2009 contains substantial allegations against Israel and the Palestinian side for war crimes, and other human rights violations. It was the task of a Committee of Experts established by the Human Rights Council in March 2010 to inquire whether Israel and the Palestinians had carried out credible and genuine investigations into those allegations. While receiving a positive response from Palestinian authorities, the Committee failed in its efforts to win the cooperation of the Israeli government and was therefore prevented from entering Israel and the West Bank, consequently keeping them from engaging indirect talks with the responsible Israeli authorities. Notwithstanding, the availability of three official Israeli reports, the Committee concluded that, given the lack of sufficient evidence, it could not ascertain that Israel had acted in conformity with the relevant criteria. A report mandated by the Palestinian Authority showed a high degree of frankness while, in comparison, two reports of the de facto authorities in Gaza primarily confined themselves to bringing charges against Israel. Adapted from the source document.
In: Vereinte Nationen, Band 58, Heft 6, S. 249-254
In: Humanitäres Völkerrecht: Informationsschriften ; HuV-I = Journal of international law of peace and armed conflict, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 131-136
ISSN: 0937-5414
World Affairs Online