The central idea of this "article" is that certain developments such as extreme simplification, the politicisation of medical ethics, the "normative industry" and "empirethics", may seriously threaten the (future) practice of medical ethics.
<b><i>Background and Objective:</i></b> Advances in omics open new opportunities for cancer risk prediction and risk-based screening interventions. However, implementation of risk prediction in clinical practice may impact the ethical, legal, and regulatory aspects of current cancer screening programs. In order to support decision-making, we analyzed the ethical, legal, and regulatory issues and developed a set of Points to Consider to support management of these issues. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We analyzed the legal and policy frameworks applicable to breast and cervical cancer screening programs in 7 European countries. We identified the most relevant issues to be considered, and we developed considerations for their management, based on the literature, the legal and policy frameworks, and our experience with similar issues. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The considerations focus on five topics: (A) health services planning, (B) information and invitation, (C) consent and data/sample collection, (D) risk calculation and communication of results, and (E) storage of data and residual samples. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Current frameworks might not be adequate to implement a risk prediction approach using omics factors due to the different characteristics of such approaches.
When assessing the risks of a research protocol, review boards need to consider not only the possible harms but also the expected discomfort levels caused by the various study procedures. However, data on how children experience various study procedures are scarce. This study assessed perceived discomfort levels in 671 healthy children aged 0–2 years undergoing vaccinations, venipunctures, and nasopharyngeal swab taking. In half of the study participants, venipunctures caused a moderate or high level of discomfort (49%). Corresponding figures for nasopharyngeal swabbing and vaccinations were 28% and 12%, respectively. Within the reported age group, increasing age was related with higher discomfort levels. In a majority of cases for all study procedures, the perceived levels of discomfort met the parents' expectations.