Editor's Note
In: Political analysis: PA ; the official journal of the Society for Political Methodology and the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 1-2
ISSN: 1476-4989
73 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Political analysis: PA ; the official journal of the Society for Political Methodology and the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 1-2
ISSN: 1476-4989
In: Political analysis: official journal of the Society for Political Methodology, the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 1-2
ISSN: 1047-1987
In: European Union politics: EUP, Band 8, Heft 4, S. 567-576
ISSN: 1741-2757
In: European Union politics: EUP, Band 8, Heft 4, S. 567
ISSN: 1465-1165
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of the Western Political Science Association and other associations, Band 59, Heft 3, S. 329-341
ISSN: 1938-274X
In recent years political scientists have become increasingly sensitive to questions of conditional dependence in their data. I outline and compare two general, widely-used approaches for addressing such dependence—robust variance estimators and generalized estimating equations (GEEs)—using data on votes in Supreme Court search and seizure decisions between 1963 and 1981. The results make clear that choices about the unit on which data are grouped, i.e., clustered, are typically of far greater significance than are decisions about which type estimator is used.
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of Western Political Science Association, Pacific Northwest Political Science Association, Southern California Political Science Association, Northern California Political Science Association, Band 59, Heft 3, S. 329-342
ISSN: 1065-9129
In: Political analysis: PA ; the official journal of the Society for Political Methodology and the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 157-170
ISSN: 1476-4989
A common problem in models for dichotomous dependent variables is "separation," which occurs when one or more of a model's covariates perfectly predict some binary outcome. Separation raises a particularly difficult set of issues, often forcing researchers to choose between omitting clearly important covariates and undertaking post—hoc data or estimation corrections. In this article I present a method for solving the separation problem, based on a penalized likelihood correction to the standard binomial GLM score function. I then apply this method to data from an important study on the postwar fate of leaders.
In: Political analysis: official journal of the Society for Political Methodology, the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 157-170
ISSN: 1047-1987
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 2, Heft 2
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 377-378
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: International interactions: empirical and theoretical research in international relations, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 433-445
ISSN: 1547-7444
In: International interactions: empirical and theoretical research in international relations, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 433-445
ISSN: 0305-0629
In: American journal of political science: AJPS, Band 45, Heft 2, S. 470
ISSN: 0092-5853
In: American journal of political science: AJPS, Band 45, Heft 2, S. 470
ISSN: 0092-5853
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 54, Heft 3, S. 517-520
ISSN: 1537-5935