The social life of opium in China, 1483-1999
In: Modern Asian studies, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 1-40
ISSN: 0026-749X
19 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Modern Asian studies, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 1-40
ISSN: 0026-749X
World Affairs Online
In: China studies 21
In: Cultural and social history: official journal of the Social History Society, S. 1-2
ISSN: 1478-0046
In: Journal of Chinese Overseas, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 137-139
ISSN: 1793-2548
In: Social history, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 363-364
ISSN: 1470-1200
In: Modern Asian studies, Band 42, Heft 6, S. 1113-1136
ISSN: 1469-8099
AbstractHunan produced the largest number and most able leaders for the Chinese Communist Party. How could this land-locked, sleepy and conservative province produce so many revolutionaries? This article examines the consequences of three consecutive political theatres and their actors that turned Hunan into a laboratory of reform and land of revolution. It focuses on what three generations of Hunanese did that pushed Hunan into and kept the province in the national spotlight. The Hunanese, be they Qing loyalists, constitutional reformers, Han nationalists or communists, dominated China's political stage from the 1850s to the 1980s. They were patriotic and pragmatic in their patriotism. Would the Communist Revolution have been so fundamental and bloody had Champagne liberals or those with no militarist tradition controlled the helm? With the tide of Hunan gone, we must re-examine this province to see how it had shaped and changed the course of modern China.
In: Modern Asian studies, Band 42, Heft 6, S. 1113-1136
ISSN: 0026-749X
In: Journal of Southeast Asian studies, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 165-166
ISSN: 1474-0680
In: Modern Asian studies, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 1-39
ISSN: 1469-8099
The history of opium is a major theme in modern Chinese history. Books and academic careers have been devoted to its study. Yet the question that scholars of the opium wars and of modern China have failed to ask is how the demand for opium was generated. My puzzle, during the initial stage of research, was who smoked opium and why. Neither Chinese nor non-Chinese scholars have written much about this, with the exception of Jonathan Spence. Although opium consumption is a well-acknowledged fact, the reasons for its prevalence have never been fully factored into the historiography of the opium wars and of modern China. Michael Greenberg has dwelt on the opium trade, Chang Hsin-pao and Peter Fay on the people and events that made armed conflicts between China and the West unavoidable. John Wong has continued to focus on imperialism, James Polachek on Chinese internal politics while Opium regimes: China, Britain, and Japan, 1839–1952, the latest work, has studied the political systems that controlled opium. But the political history of opium, like the opium trade and the theatre of war, is only part of the story. We need to distinguish them from the wider social and cultural life of opium in China. The vital questions are first, the point at which opium was transformed from a medicine to a luxury item and, secondly, why it became so popular and widespread after people discovered its recreational value. It is these questions that I address. We cannot fully understand the root problem of the opium wars and their role in the emergence of modern China until we can explain who was smoking opium and why they smoked it.
In: Modern Asian studies, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 1-40
ISSN: 0026-749X
In: The Cold War in Asia, S. 119-146
World Affairs Online
In: Pacific affairs, Band 79, Heft 3, S. 532
ISSN: 0030-851X