Suchergebnisse

This major extension of existing scholarship on the fragmentation of international law utilises the concept of 'regimes' from international law and international relations literature to define functional areas such as human rights or trade law. Responding to existing approaches, which focus on the resolution of conflicting norms between regimes, it contains a variety of critical, sociological and doctrinal perspectives on regime interaction. Leading international law scholars and practitioners reflect on how, in situations of diversity and concurrent activity, such interaction shapes and controls knowledge and norms in often hegemonic ways. The contributors draw on topical examples of interacting regimes, including climate, trade and investment regimes, to argue for new methods of regime interaction. Together, the essays combine approaches from international, transnational and comparative constitutional law to provide important insights into an issue that continues to challenge international legal theory and practice

If our work is future-oriented, problem-solving, and global in scope, we are all climate lawyers now. But, beyond widening the epistemic circle of climate lawyers, we must understand two things. First, the reach of climate change law into so many areas of international law requires an understanding of how these laws fit together—clashing, supporting, side-stepping, deferring, pulling rank. Second, we need to constantly ask how they should fit together, and for which beneficiaries. From the perspective of the fragmentation of international law, trade lawyers, environmental lawyers, and human rights lawyers can be said to be climate lawyers now, but convergence is neither the best explanation nor the best normative guidepost. We should strategically embrace law making and adjudication everywhere, but be conscious that our attention might be diverted to particular functional ends when issues of mitigation or adaptation are framed to suit the structural biases or vocabularies of particular regimes.

Numerous international legal regimes now seek to address the global depletion of fish stocks, and increasingly their activities overlap. The relevant laws were developed at different times by different groups of states. They are motivated by divergent economic approaches, influenced by disparate non-state actors, and implemented by separate institutions such as the World Trade Organization and the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. Margaret Young shows how these and other factors affect the interaction between regimes. Her empirical and doctrinal analysis moves beyond the discussion of conflicting norms that has dominated the fragmentation debate. Case-studies include the negotiation of new rules on fisheries subsidies, the restriction of trade in endangered marine species and the adjudication of fisheries import bans. She explores how regimes should interact, in fisheries governance and beyond, to offer insights into the practice and legitimacy of regime interaction in international law.