Suchergebnisse

Feminist epistemologies consider ways in which gender (among other social factors) influences knowledge. In this article, I want to consider a particular kind of feminist empiricism that has been called feminist radical empiricism (where the empiricism, not the feminism, is radical). I am particularly interested in this view's treatment of values as empirical, and consequently up for revision on the basis of empirical evidence. Proponents of this view cite the fact that it allows us to talk about certain things such as racial and gender equality as objective facts: not just whether we have achieved said equality in our society, but whether we are, in fact, all equal. I will raise the concern that the way in which they model the role of values in epistemology may be a problematic idealization of the open‐mindedness of human agents. In some cases, resistance to value‐change cannot be diagnosed as a failure to respond adequately to evidence. If so, the strategy of empirically testing our values that some feminist radical empiricists suggest may not be as useful a tool for social change as they think.

The logical empiricists often appear as a foil for feminist theories. Their emphasis on the individualistic nature of knowledge and on the value-neutrality of science seems directly opposed to most feminist concerns. However, several recent works have highlighted aspects of Carnap's views that make him seem like much less of a straightforwardly positivist thinker. Certain of these aspects lend themselves to feminist concerns much more than the stereotypical picture would imply.

"This book argues for prison abolition within the framework of feminist philosophy. Based in the Anglo-American, analytic tradition, the authors also draw on non-analytic sources, historical sources, and activist writing. The authors argue for a multi-generational collective action to build resilient communities that support the wellbeing of all"--

This book argues for prison abolition within the framework of feminist philosophy. Based in the Anglo-American, analytic tradition, the authors also draw on non-analytic sources, historical sources, and activist writing. The authors argue for a multi-generational collective action to build resilient communities that support the wellbeing of all.