Suchergebnisse

Some Thoughts on Reply Briefs

Brief of Professors Mark C. Weber and Bernard P. Perlmutter as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner (U.S. Supreme Ct. No. 21-887)

The DACA decision: Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California and its implications

In: Georgetown Law Journal, Band 110, Heft 135

How to Conclude a Brief

Brief of Appellant in C.W. V. Denver County School District, No. 19-14-07 (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit)

Brief of Brian Wolfman, Aderson B. Francois, and Eric Schnapper as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner in Peterson v. Linear Controls Incorporated (U.S. Supreme Court, No. 18-1401)

In: United States Supreme Court, No. 18-1401

Amicus Brief of National Employment Lawyers Association in Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton (U.S. Supreme Court No. 16-74)

Testimony to the Federal Civil Rules Advisory Committee on Proposed Amendments to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Amicus Briefs of the National Association of Consumer Advocates in Day v. Persels & Associates, 729 F.3d 1309 (11th Cir. 2013)

Judges! Stop Deferring to Class-Action Lawyers

In: University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, Band 2, S. 80-90

Wyeth v. Levine and Its Implications

In: Product Safety & Liability Report (BNA), Band 37, S. 550-558

Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett and Its Implications

In: The United States Law Week (BNA), Band 82, S. 1-18

PLIVA v. Mensing and Its Implications

In: Product Safety & Liability Report (BNA), Band 39, S. 972-982

Bates v. Dow Agrosciences: Will the Lower Courts Finally Start Listening?

In: Product Safety & Liability Report (BNA), Band 33, S. 949-954

What the Shutts Opt-Out Right is and What it Ought to Be

In: University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Band 74, Heft 3