THE QUESTION OF BUREAUCRATIC EFFECTIVENESS HAS BEEN AN ISSUE OF GREAT CONCERN AND DISAGREEMENT IN THE FIELD OF AMERICAN POLITICS AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. VARIOUS "SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT" AND COMPETING HYPOTHESES VIE FOR ACCEPTANCE, WHILE CASE STUDIES ARE THE PRIMARY METHOD OF EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION. THIS ARTICLE USES THE CASE SURVEY METHOD TO AGGREGATE THE COLLECTIVE JUDGEMENTS OF PREVIOUS CASE-STUDY RESEARCHERS REGARDING BUREAUCRATIC EFFECTIVENESS AND OTHER KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF U.S. CABINET AGENCIES. THE AUTHOR CONDUCTS PRELIMINARY TEST OF COMPETING THEORIES USING MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION. THE PROCESSES ACCOUNTED FOR BY THE "POLITICAL THEORY OF THE FIRM" PROVE MOST LIKELY TO BE THE CORRECT MODEL OF BUREAUCRATIC EFFECTIVENESS. THE COLLECTION OF MORE DATA WILL PERMIT GREATER SOPHISTICATION IN THE ANALYSIS AND WILL GIVE US MORE PRECISE AND RELIABLE INSIGHTS INTO THE FACTORS THAT SYSTEMATICALLY PRODUCE SOUND OR POOR PERFORMANCE IN THE AGENCIES OF AMERICA'S FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
INTRODUCTION: Monitoring of sanitation programs is often limited to sanitation access and coverage, with little emphasis on use of the facilities despite increasing evidence of widespread non-use. OBJECTIVES: We assessed patterns and determinants of individual latrine use over 12 months in a low- income rural study population that had recently received latrines as part of the Government of India's Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) in coastal Puri district in Odisha, India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We surveyed 1938 individuals (>3years) in 310 rural households with latrines from 25 villages over 12 months. Data collection rounds were timed to correspond with the seasons. The primary outcome was reported use by each member of the household over the prior 48h. We classified use into three categories-"never", "sometimes" and "always/usually". We also assessed consistency of use over six days across the three seasons (dry cold, dry hot, rainy). We explored the association between individual and household-level variables and latrine use in any given season and longitudinally using multinomial logistic regression. We also inquired about reasons for non-use. RESULTS: Overall, latrine use was poor and inconsistent. The average response probability at any given round of never use was 43.5% (95% CI=37.9, 49.1), sometimes use was 4.6% (95% CI=3.8, 5.5), and always/usual use was 51.9% (95% CI=46.2, 57.5). Only two-thirds of those who reported always/usually using a latrine in round one reported the same for all three rounds. Across all three rounds, the study population was about equally divided among those who reported never using the latrine (30.1%, 95% CI=23.0, 37.2), sometimes using the latrine (33.2%, 95% CI=28.3, 38.1) and always/usually using the latrine (36.8%, 95% CI=31.8, 41.8). The reported likelihood of always/usually versus never using the latrine was significantly greater in the dry cold season (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.18, 1.89, p=0.001) and in the rainy season (OR=1.34, 95% CI=1.07, 1.69, p=0.012), than in the dry hot season. Across all three seasons, there was increased likelihood of always/usually and sometimes using the latrine versus never using it among females and where latrines had a door and roof. Older age groups, including those aged 41-59 years and 60+ years, and increase in household size were associated with a decreased likelihood of always/usually using the latrine versus never using it. The leading reason for non-use was a preference for open defecation. CONCLUSION: Results highlight the low and inconsistent use of subsidized latrines built under the TSC in rural Odisha. This study identifies individual and household levels factors that may be used to target behavior change campaigns to drive consistent use of sanitation facilities by all.
Abstract. Aim Repeated drug use can lead to attentional bias and approach tendencies, which are thought to play an important role in problematic substance use and dependence. The aims of the current study were to 1) test an attentional retraining procedure in a sample of moderate and heavy cannabis using students and 2) compare baseline attentional and approach bias between the two groups with different implicit measures. Design and participants Attentional bias scores toward cannabis-related or neutral stimuli were determined with modified versions of the Visual Probe Task and the cannabis Stroop task. Approach and avoidance action tendencies toward cannabis-related and neutral stimuli were assessed with the cannabis Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT) and the Stimulus Response Compatibility task (SRC). Seventeen participants were assigned randomly to five sessions of an attentional retraining procedure or control training. Results Attentional retraining did not decrease the speeded detection of cannabis stimuli and the difficulty to disengage from those stimuli, no trainingseffects were revealed. Moderate cannabis users did not show an attentional bias for cannabis-related cues (measured with the cannabis Stroop task), whereas heavy cannabis users did show an attentional bias for cannabis-related stimuli that cannot be attributed to cognitive control deficits on the classical Stroop task. Moreover, heavy cannabis users, but not moderate users, were significant faster to approach cannabis images compared to neutral images, using the SRC task. Conclusion Seen the observed difference in cognitive biases towards cannabis stimuli between moderate and heavy cannabis users, this study supports the allegation that cognitive biases towards cannabis stimuli may be an important marker of problematic cannabis use.
In: Aktuelle Dermatologie: Organ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Onkologie ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Lichtforschung, Band 30, Heft 8/09
Der Abschlussbericht stellt die Ergebnisse der mehrjährigen Arbeit im Wärme-Schwerpunkt des ENavi-Projektes vor. Im Zuge der Tätigkeiten wurden Hemmnisse für Klimaschutz im Wärmesektor identifiziert, politische Maßnahmen zur Beschleunigung der Transformation definiert, deren Folgen szenario-basiert abgeschätzt und wissenschaftlich sowie diskursiv mit Stakeholdern anhand eines Kriterienkataloges bewertet. Dadurch ist der Bericht sowohl in der Transformationsforschung als auch in der transformativen Forschung hin zu einer nachhaltigen Energieversorgung angesiedelt.