Suchergebnisse

This study addresses calls for a better understanding of how team interaction mode (e.g. virtual versus face-to-face) moderates the relationship between member attributes and emergent team processes. We use Mullen's model of salience to explain conflicting predictions and results about the effects of extraversion on leadership emergence in virtual and face-to-face teams. Participants were randomly assigned to 27 four-person teams that met three times, engaging in an iterative decision-making task. Assessments of each member's leadership influence were taken after each meeting, and transcripts were content-coded. Results show that interaction mode has an indirect moderating effect on the relation between extraversion and leadership emergence, fully explained by salience. As such, this study explains an important difference in patterns of leadership emergence between virtual and face-to-face teams.

One's colleagues can be situated in close physical proximity, yet seem quite distant. Conversely, one's colleagues can be quite far away in objective terms, yet seem quite close. In this paper, we explore this paradoxical phenomenon of feeling close to geographically distant colleagues and propose a model of perceived proximity (a dyadic and asymmetric construct which reflects one person's perception of how close or how far another person is). The model shows how communication and social identification processes, as well as certain individual and socio-organizational factors, affect feelings of proximity. The aim is to broaden organizational studies' theoretical understandings of proximity to include the subjective perception of it. By shifting the focus from objective to perceived proximity, we believe that scholars can resolve many conflicting findings regarding dispersed work. By understanding what leads to perceived proximity, we also believe that managers can achieve many of the benefits of co-location without actually having employees work in one place.