In general, there are at least 3 functions of the people's representative body. First, the function of legislation. Second, the supervisory function. Third, the budget function. This type of research used in this study is normative research. By using a statutory, conceptual and historical approach. The authority of the DPR's oversight before and after the amendment to the 1945 Constitution does not only lie in the regulation, where before the change is stipulated in the explanation and after the amendment to the 1945 Constitution is regulated in the Articles of the Constitution, but there is an expansion of the intended subject. In the 1945 Constitution prior to the amendment, the supervision of the House of Representatives was only addressed to the President whereas after the amendment to the 1945 Constitution the supervision of the House of Representatives was not only addressed to the President, but to all agencies or officials who carried out Government functions. The authority of the House of Representatives in conducting oversight becomes wider after the issuance of the Constitutional Court ruling No. 36 / PUU-XV / 2017, because independent state institutions, such as the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Election Commission can be subject to oversight by the House of Representatives.
Amendments to the 1945 Constitution have provided support to the DPR, including strengthening the DPR's oversight function. Article 22 Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The DPR's supervisory function as a compilatory composer is elaborated in Article 79 paragraphs (2) and (3) of Law No. 17 of 2014 concerning the People's Consultative Assembly, the People's Representative Council, the Regional Representative Council and the Regional People's Representative Council (MD3). In Article 79 paragraphs (2) and (3) of MD3 Law only norms are formulated which become the object of interpellation and the questionnaire rights are legislation and policies. The formulation of Article 79 paragraphs (2) and (3) does not explain the parameters used by the DPR to request policies from the Government. The purpose of this article is to provide parameters for the use of interpellation rights and questionnaire rights to government policies. This type of research in this paper is normative research. With primary legal material for the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Law No. 17 of 2014 concerning the People's Consultative Assembly, the People's Representative Council, the Regional Representative Council and the Regional People's Representative Council (MD3). The parameters of the right of interpellation and the right of questionnaire to government policies that were born from free government authority are general principles of good governance (AAUPB).
Abstrak Iklan menjadi kebutuhan utama dalam dunia bisnis. Reklame merupakan salah satu media periklanan yang diminati karena dapat menjangkau banyak calon konsumen. Ukuran reklame yang beragam dapat mengganggu estetika tata kota jika tidak diatur. Reklame di Kabupaten Sampang setiap tahunnya semakin meningkat seiring perkembangan wilayahnya. Kabupaten Sampang adalah salah yang memiliki permasalahan mengenai reklame. Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Sampang telah mengatur penyelenggaraan reklame melalui Peraturan Bupati Nomor 61 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelenggaraan Reklame yang kemudian diubah dengan Peraturan Bupati Nomor 47 Tahun 2017 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Bupati Nomor 61 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Izin Penyelenggaraan Reklame. Penegakan hukum yang masih kurang menjadi salah satu penyebab banyaknya pelanggaran izin penyelenggaraan reklame yang terjadi di Kabupaten Sampang. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui proses pengekan hukum terhadap pelanggaran izin penyelenggaraan reklame di Kabupaten Sampang dan untuk mengetahui kendala apa saja yang dihadapi dalam proses penegakan hukum terhadap izin penyelenggaraan reklame di Kabupaten Sampang. Jenis penelitian yang akan digunakan dalam penyusunan penulisan skripsi ini adalah penelitian hukum empiris dengan model penelitian yuridis sosiologis yaitu penelitian yang berbasis pada peraturan perundang-undangan dan mengamati reaksi serta interaksi masyarakat terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan terkait. Hasil dan pembahasan dalam penelitian ini penegakan hukum terhadap izin penyelenggaraan reklame di Kabupaten Sampang masih kurang sesuai dengan masih banyaknya pelanggaran yang masih terjadi. Hal ini dipengaruhi oleh 3 (tiga) unsur, yaitu unsur pembuatan undang-undang, unsur penegakan hukum dan unsur lingkungan. Beberapa hambatan dalam penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggran izin penyelenggraan reklame adalah kurangnya koordinasi instansi terkait, terbatasnya sarana penegakan hukum, dan rendahnya pengetahuan dan kesadaran masyarakat akan peraturan yang ada.Kata Kunci : Penegakan hukum, Perizinan, Reklame AbstractBillboards is a major needs in the business world. Billboard is one of the advertising media that been favored because because it can reach many prospective customers. The various size of billboards can disturb the city planner aestethics if it aren't arranged. Billboards in Sampang districts increases every year as the regon develops. Sampang district is one of the districts that has problems regarding billboards. The regional government of Sampang District has regulated about management of billboards through Regent Regulation Number 61 Year 2015 Concern Management Procedures of Billboards that has changed into Regent Regulation Number 47 Year 2017 About Amandement on Regent Regulation Number 61 Year 2015 About Management Procedures of Billboards. The lacks of legal enforcement are one of the causes of the many billboards management violations in Sampang District. The purpose of this research is to find out the legal enforcement process on violations on billboards management permission in Sampang District and to find out the obstacles faced in the process of legal enforcement towards billboards management permissions in Sampang District. The type of the research that is used in this essay is empirical legal research with sociological yurical research, which are research that based on regulation and observing the reactions and interactions of the society towards the relevant laws and regulations. The results and discussion in this research are the legal enforcement towards billboards management permissions in Sampang District is still not suitable by many violations that still occur. This are affected by three factors, which are law making factors, legal enforcement factors, and environmental factors. Some of the obstacles in the legal enforcements towards violations of billboards management permissions are the lack of coordination from the related institution, the limited tools on legal enforcement, and the lack of knowledge and awareness of society related to the existing regulations. Keywords: Legal Enforcement, Permission, Billboards.
Handling Covid-19 which must be completed immediately must be made a special treatment. The urgent situation requires that a binding regulation be made in the situation of handling Covid-19 very quickly. The Tulungagung Regency Government issued a Circular regarding the implementation of Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB). The problem is that the Circular which is a policy regulation can only regulate it, not for the wider community. This study aims to determine the function of the Circular issued by the regent as discretion in handling Covid-19 by regulating the community curfew, and to find out the legal consequences of issuing a circular letter by the regent in handling Covid-19. The research method used is a normative juridical type, using a statutory approach and a concept approach. The results of the study show that the Circular issued is categorized as a beleidsregel (policy regulation). This circular has the same legal status as operational guidelines, technical guidelines, official notes, announcements, guidelines and other similar terms. Beleidsregel is similar to regeling, but it is not intended/binding in general to the community and only binds internally to an institution. So that the regulation related to PSBB in the Tulungagung area related to the implementation of the curfew for all large business actors and MSMEs is less productive. The Circular issued by the Regional Government of Tulungagung Regency can be considered as a discretion. This is because there should be another mechanism established to be able to regulate theestablishment of a Regional Regulation.
Abstrak Perppu Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 juga menjelaskan pemerintah tidak hanya memiliki kewajiban untuk membina perkumpulan/ormas saja. Melainkan juga memfasilitasi laporan dari masyarakat jika ada indikasi laporan suatu perkumpulan/ormas yang melenceng dari ideologi dan hukum negara. Adapun instansi pemerintah yang berada di ranah politik, hukum, dan keamanan yang akan melakukan tindakan tegas kepada perkumpulan/ormas yang disinyalir memiliki ideologi yang melenceng dari Pancasila. Rumusan masalah dari penelitian ini adalah apa pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 27 K/TUN/2019 serta apa akibat hukum bagi Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) atas Putusan Nomor 27 K/TUN/2019. Adapun tujuan penelitian ini dilaksanakan adalah menganalis tinjauan yuridis terhadap pembubaran organisasi masyarkat Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI). Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Putusan Nomor 27 K/TUN/2019 adalah gugatan Pemohon Kasasi/Dahulu Penggugat ditolak dengan pertimbangan pemohon Kasasi/Dahulu Penggugat telah melakukan pelanggaran terhadap Pasal 59 ayat (4) huruf c Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan (selanjutnya disebut Perppu Ormas). Prosedur penjatuhan sanksinya singkat dan cukup meminta pertimbangan dari instansi terkait in casu Menteri Koordinator Bidang Politik, Hukum dan Keamanan RI oleh karenanya secara prosedural tindakan Termohon Kasasi/Dahulu Tergugat telah sesuai dengan Pasal 61 ayat (4) Perppu Ormas. Akibat hukumnya, bagi Pemohon Kasasi/Dahulu Penggugat yaitu: menolak permohonan kasasi dari Pemohon Kasasi. Menghukum Pemohon Kasasi membayar biaya perkara pada tingkat kasasi sejumlah Rp500.000,00 (lima ratus ribu rupiah). Adapun bagi Termohon Kasasi/Dahulu Tergugat yaitu: dilaksanakannya Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor AHU-30.AH.01.08 Tahun 2017 tentang Pencabutan Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor AHU-00282.60.10.2014 tentang Pengesahan Pendirian Badan Hukum Perkumpulan Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, tanggal 19 Juli 2017. Pertimbangan dari instansi terkait in casu Menteri Koordinator Bidang Politik, Hukum dan Keamanan RI telah sesuai secara prosedural sesuai dengan Pasal 61 ayat (4) Perppu Ormas. Kata kunci: organisasi masyarakat, pertimbangan hakim, HTI.Abstract Government regulation of substitute Law number 2 year 2017 describes that the government not only have the obligation to build a society/ community organization but also facilitates society report if there is an indication of the report of an association/community organization that deviated from the ideology and laws of the country. The government agencies that are in the realm of politics, law, and security will take strict actions to the association/community organization that allegedly has an ideology that deviates from Pancasila. The main issue that will be discussed in this research is the consideration of the judges in the Decree No. 27 K/TUN/2019 as well as the legal consequences for Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) as an effect from verdict number 27 K/TUN/2019. The purpose of this research is to analyze the juridicial review of the dissolution of the Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI). The research method that is used in this study is normative legal research with a statutory approach. Verdict No. 27 K/TUN/2019/ Applicants lawsuit/Advance claimant rejected with consideration of the applicant Casasi/First Plaintiff has committed a breach of Article 59 paragraph (4) Letter C the Government regulation of substitute Law No. 2 year 2017 on the amendment to law number 17 year 2013 about the community organization (called Government regulation of substitute Law of community organization) The procedures of the allotment is relatively short and simple, which is to seek consideration from the relevant agencies, namely the Coordinating Minister for Political Affairs, Law and security of INDONESIA, therefore procedurally the respondents act of the defendant/defendant was in accordance with article 61 Paragraph (4) Government regulation of substitute Law of community organization. The legal consequence of the Claimant is rejecting the appeal of cassation from the applicant. Punishing the cassation applicant pays the cost of the case at the cassation level with an amount of RP 500.000,00 (five hundred thousand rupiah). The legal consequence for the respondent cased/first defendant is: the implementation of the Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia number AHU-30. AH.01.08 year 2017 on revocation of Decree of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia number AHU00282.60.10.2014 on the ratification of the establishment of Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia Association Law, dated 19 July 2017. Consideration of the relevant agencies in casu Coordinating Minister for Political Affairs, Law and security of RI has been procedurally compliant and in accordance with article 61 paragraph (4) Government regulation of substitute Law of community organization. Keywords: community organization, judges consideration, HTI.
Abstrak Kontroversi keputusan yang dikeluarkan oleh Pelaksana Tugas Gubernur (Plt. Gubernur) DKI Jakarta yaitu Sumarsono bermula ketika beliau menandatangani APBD. Sumarsono menandatangani APBD atas dasar Pasal 9 ayat (1) huruf d Permendagri No. 74/2016 tentang Cuti di Luar Tanggungan Negara Bagi Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur, Bupati dan Wakil Bupati, Serta Walikota dan Wakil Walikota. Menurutnya, pasal tersebut memberikan kewenangan untuk mengubah APBD. Pelaksana tugas mendapatkan kewenangan melalui mandat. Menurut Pasal 14 ayat (7) Undang-Undang No. 30 tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan menyatakan bahwa "Badan dan/atau Pejabat Pemerintahan yang memperoleh Wewenang melalui Mandat tidak berwenang mengambil Keputusan dan/atau Tindakan yang bersifat strategis yang berdampak pada perubahan status hukum pada aspek organisasi, kepegawaian, dan alokasi anggaran.". APBD merupakan tindakan strategis mengenai alokasi anggaran. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kewenangan Plt. Gubernur menurut peraturan perundang-undangan dan implikasi dari keputusan dan/atau tindakan yang diambil. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum serta teknik analisis bahan hukum dengan cara melakukan telaah atas isu hukum yang diajukan. Pendekatan penelitian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menujukkan bahwa APBD yang ditandatangani oleh Sumarsono tetap sah karena Plt. Gubernur berwenang menandatangani APBD setelah mendapat persetujuan tertulis dari Mendagri. Perluasan kewenangan yang dicantumkan dalam Permendagri No. 74/2016 merupakan langkah diskresi Mendagri. Langkah diskresi Mendagri bertujuan agar roda pemerintahan berjalan dengan lancar, karena terjadi kekosongan jabatan pada saat APBD harus disahkan. Diskresi yang diambil oleh Mendagri berpotensi menimbulkan tindakan penyalahgunaan wewenang. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah apabila APBD disahkan oleh Pejabat yang tidak berwenang, maka APBD tersebut tidak sah setelah resmi dibatalkan. Ada dua mekanisme pembatalan perda, yakni Judicial Review dan Executive Review. a) Judicial Review dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Agung. Pembatalan ini dilakukan dengan cara uji materiil, yang merupakan salah satu cakupan judicial review. Hak uji materiil merupakan hak Mahkamah Agung untuk menilai materi muatan peraturan perundang-undangan di bawah undang-undang terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang lebih tinggi. b) Executive Review dilakukan oleh menteri atau gubernur. Untuk perda kabupaten/kota yang bertentangan dengan perda provinsi, Gubernur berwenang membatalkan perda kabupaten/kota tersebut dengan keputusan Gubernur. Kata Kunci: pelaksana tugas gubernur, kewenangan, diskresi Abstract Decision controversy issued by the Action Governor of DKI Jakarta (Act. Governor) Sumarsono started when he signed the annual budgets. Sumarsono signed the annual budgets on the basis of Article 9 Paragraph (1) Sub-Paragraph d of Permendagri number 74/2016 about Leave Out of State Dependence For Governors and Deputy Governors, Regents and Deputy Regents, and Mayors and Deputy Mayors. According to him, the article gives the authority to change the annual budgets. Executing tasks get authority through mandate. Based on article 14 paragraph (7) of Law number 30/2014 about Administration of Governments states that "The Agency and / or Government Officials who have the Authority through the Mandate are not authorized to take any strategic Decisions and/or Measures that affect the change of legal status on the organizational, personnel, and budgetary aspects". Annual bidgets is a strategic action on budget allocation. The purpose of this research is to know the authority of Act. Governor according to legislation and to know the implications of the decisions and / or actions taken. This study uses legal research methods. Technique of analyzing legal substance by conducting a review on legal issue. The research approach uses legislation approach, conceptual approach and case approach. The results of this study indicate that the annual budgets signed by Sumarsono remains valid because Act. The Governor is authorized to sign the annaul budgets after obtaining written approval from the Minister of Home Affairs. The extension of the authority set out in Permendagri No. 74/2016 is a discretionary measure of the Minister of Home Affairs. The discretionary step of the Minister of Home Affairs aims to make the wheels of government run smoothly, because vacancy occurs when the annual budgets has to be ratified. The discretion taken by the Minister of Home Affairs has the potential to cause misuse of authority. The implication of this study is that if annual budgets is approved by an unauthorized official, then the annual budgets is not valid after it is officially canceled. There are two mechanisms for cancellation of local regulations, namely Judicial Review and Executive Review. a) Judicial Review conducted by the Supreme Court. This cancellation is done by material test, which is one of the scope of judicial review. The right to judicial review is the right of the Supreme Court to assess the content of statutory content under the law against higher laws and regulations. b) Executive Review conducted by the minister or governor. For the district/city regulation that is contrary to the provincial regulation, the Governor has the authority to cancel the district/city regulation with the Governors decision. Keywords: action governor, authority, discretion
Constitutional changes are part of the political and legal dynamics of a country. Changes to the constitution aim to meet the legal demands and needs of the community so that they are clearly and firmly regulated in the constitution. This paper is oriented towards the idea of a formal review of constitutional changes in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research. The approach used in this research is a conceptual approach, a comparative approach, and a statutory approach. The primary legal materials in this study include the text of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, constitutional texts in various countries and the Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Secondary legal materials include: books, journal articles, and websites related to the constitution and constitutional law. Non-legal materials include legal dictionaries. The results of the study indicate that a formal review of constitutional changes is needed as an effort to maintain the supremacy of the constitution, including also placing the court's function as guardians of the law and the constitution in dealing with the determination of non-legal aspects in constitutional changes
This research is normative research. The purpose of this research is to examine the emergency constitutional law related to the concept of health emergencies as referred to in Law No. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine; and provide comprehensive analysis and formulation related to future emergency law arrangements. The research method used in this research is a statute approach and a conceptual approach; by using primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this study are the legal implications related to the determination of the health emergency status based on Presidential Decree No. 11 of 2020 has created legal uncertainty, because the government has actually issued Government Regulation No. 21 of 2020 first; is not a Government Regulation on procedures for determining and revoking the status of determining health emergencies. On the other hand, the determination of public health emergencies is not synergistic with its implementation. Furthermore, an ideal arrangement is needed in the future related to public health emergencies in order to achieve legal certainty in public health emergencies. For this reason, a harmonization of the state of danger law is needed or the establishment of a danger state law such as the omnibus bill
Abstrak Peraturan Walikota Surabaya Nomor 21 Tahun 2018 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelenggaraan Reklame pada pasal 4 ayat (1) menjelaskan bahwa setiap orang pribadi atau badan yang akan menyelenggarakan reklame di Daerah wajib memperoleh izin penyelenggaraan reklame dari Walikota. Namun pada kenyataannya, masih banyak orang yang tidak melakukan izin dan melakukan pelanggaran penyelenggaraan reklame di Kota Surabaya. Hal tersebut berdampak pada Pendapatan Asli Daerah Kota Surabaya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apa yang menjadi kendala penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran izin reklame di Kota Surabaya sehingga sampai saat ini pelanggaran mengenai izin reklame masih tetap ada serta untuk mengetahui apa upaya yang telah dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Kota Surabaya untuk mengoptimalisasi penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran izin reklame di Kota Surabaya. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis sosiologis. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara wawancara dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan yaitu deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran izin reklame di Kota Surabaya tidak berjalan efektif. Terdapat kendala dalam proses penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran izin reklame di Kota Surabaya yaitu minimnya personil Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja sebagai penegak hukum, dan ketidaktaatan masyarakat Kota Surabaya terhadap peraturan yang berlaku. Kata kunci : izin, penegakan hukum, reklame, kendala Abstract Surabaya Mayor Regulation No. 21 of 2018 on Procedure for Managing Advertisements in Article 4 paragraph (1) explains that every individual or agency that will conduct advertisement in the Region must obtain the advertisement permit from the Mayor. But in reality, there are still many people who do not permit and violate the advertisement in Surabaya. This has an impact on the Original Revenue of the City of Surabaya. The purpose of this study is to find out what are the obstacles to law enforcement for violations of advertisement license violations in the city of Surabaya so that until now violations regarding advertisement licenses still exist and to find out what efforts have been made by the Surabaya City Government to optimize law enforcement against violations of advertisement license violations in the city of Surabaya. This research uses sociological juridical research type. Data collection is done by interview and documentation. The data analysis technique used is descriptive qualitative. The results showed that law enforcement against advertisement license violations in Surabaya City was not effective. There are obstacles in the process of law enforcement on violations of advertisement license violations in Surabaya, namely the lack of personnel from the Civil Service Police Unit as law enforcers, and the disobedience of the people of Surabaya City against the applicable regulations. Keywords: permit, law enforcement, advertisement, obstacles
Pemilihan Kepala Desa merupakan salah satu bentuk demokrasi di sebuah Pemerintahan tingkat Desa. Demokrasi dalam konteks Pemilihan Kepala Desa dapat dipahami sebagai pengakuan keanekaragaman serta sikap politik partisipasif dari masyarakat dalam bingkai demokratisasi pada tingkat desa. Dalam masa transisi menuju demokrasi seperti yang terjadi di Indonesia saat ini salah satunya di Kabupaten Bojonegoro, penyalahgunanaan wewenang yang di lakukan oleh pejabat atau lembaga perwakilan rakyat masih banyak terjadi. Mekanisme demokrasi dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa masih jauh dari sempurna dan belum menjamin terbentuknya pemerintahan yang bersih dan berwibawa. Padahal tindakan seperti ini tidak dibenarkan dalam Undang – Undang yang berlaku di Indonesia. Karena pada dasarnya tindakan tersebut termasuk dalam kategori praktik politik uang. Pelanggaran money politics diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 2012, mengatur larangan melakukan politik uang terutama pada pasal 86 ayat (1) huruf J. Berbunyi: pelaksana, peserta, dan petugas kampanye pemilu dilarang menjanjikan atau memberikan uang atau materi lainnya, kepada peserta kampanye pemilu. Larangan tersebut diikuti dengan ancaman pidana pada pasal 301 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 2012, yang menyatakan setiap pelaksana kampanye pemilu yang dengan sengaja menjanjikan atau memberikan uang atau materi lainnya sebagai imbalan kepada peserta kampanye pemilu, secara langsung maupun tidak langsung. Sebagaimana dimaksud dalam pasal 89, dipidana penjara paling lama 2 tahun dan denda paling banyak Rp 24 juta. Tujuan Penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa praktik politik uang dan penegakan hukum dalam proses Pemilihan Kepala Desa yang terjadi di Bojonegoro kususnya di Desa Tlogorejo. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis empiris yang berlokasi di Desa Tlogorejo.
Abstrak Badan Pengawas Pemilu mencatat setidaknya terdapat 200 mantan pelaku korupsi yang mendaftar menjadi calon legislatif untuk pemilu 2019, sekitar 36 di antara mereka diloloskan oleh Badan Pengawas Pemilu, meski saat itu MA belum membatalkan PKPU 20/2020. Peraturan PKPU No 20 Tahun 2018 yang melarang mantan koruptor menjadi calon legislatif ialah salah satu cara negara dalam bertindak luar biasa melawan koruptor agar tak lagi dapat mengelola negara melalui pintu lembaga perwakilan di DPR dan DPRD. Karena itu, dalam batas penalaran hukum yang progresif-responsif, sesungguhnya peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum yang dibatalkan Mahkamah Agung ini tidak bertentangan dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI No 4/PUU-VII/2009 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI No 46/PUU-XIII/ dan Pasal 240 UU No 7/2017 tentang Pemilu. Tujuan penelitian ini antara lain untuk mengetahui latar belakang pengaturan Pasal 4 ayat (3) PKPU Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 serta kedudukannya dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan, serta untuk mengetahui kesesuaian proses pembentukan Pasal 4 ayat (3) PKPU Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 telah memenuhi asas-asas pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian hukum ini termasuk jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Adapun pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah conseptual approach dan statute approach. Jenis bahan hukum penelitan ini terdiri dari pendekatan hukum primer, sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum sesuai dengan pendekatan penelitian ini adalah mencari dan mengumpulkan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan pemilu kemudian dianalisa secara kualitatif. Latar belakang munculnya norma sebagaimana dalam Pasal 4 ayat (3) PKPU Nomor 20 Tahun 2018, KPU telah memenuhi legitimasi hukum (landasan filosofis, sosiologis, dan yuridis). Kedudukan Pasal 4 ayat (3) PKPU Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 ketika hanya melihat sifat lembaganya yang independen serta kewenangannya, pasal tersebut tidak melanggar suatu aturan apapun, sehingga patut diterima oleh hukum. Namun, mengingat hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan, pasal tersebut jelas tidak mematuhi aturan pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan. Sebab, Pasal 4 ayat (3) PKPU Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 telah memuat norma yang tidak memiliki celah dari norma umumnya dalam Undang-Undnag Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Asas-asas pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan yang diadopsi secara umum oleh PKPU Nomor 20 Tahun 2018, dan secara khusus oleh Pasal 4 ayat (3) PKPU Nomor 20 Tahun 2018, tidak utuh. Secara formil, asas yang tidak cukup terpenuhi ialah kesesuaian antara jenis, hierarki, dan materi muatan Pasal 4 ayat (3) PKPU Nomor 20 Tahun 2018. Prinsipnya peraturan tersebut hanya menyelenggarakan suatu urusan pemerintahan berdasarkan fungsi yang diberikan oleh undang-undang. Kata kunci: pemilu, pertimbangan hakim, KPU Abstract The Election Supervisory Agency noted that there were at least 200 former corruptors who registered as candidates for the 2019 election, around 36 of them were passed by the Election Supervisory Body, although at that time the Supreme Court had not canceled PKPU 20/2020. PKPU Regulation No. 20 of 2018 which prohibits former corruptors from becoming legislative candidates is one of the ways in which the state acts extraordinarily against corruptors so that they can no longer manage the country through the door of representative institutions in the DPR and DPRD. Therefore, within the limits of progressive-responsive legal reasoning, the actual regulation of the Election Commission that was annulled by the Supreme Court does not conflict with the Constitutional Court Decision No 4 / PUU-VII / 2009 and the Constitutional Court Decision No 46 / PUU-XIII / and Article 240 of Law No. 7/2017 concerning Elections. The purpose of this study is to find out the background of the regulation of Article 4 paragraph (3) PKPU Number 20 of 2018 and its position in the hierarchy of laws and regulations, as well as to determine the suitability of the process of forming Article 4 paragraph (3) of PKPU Number 20 of 2018 fulfilling the principle -asas formation of laws and regulations. This legal research is a type of normative research. The approach used in this research is the conceptual approach and statute approach. This type of legal research material consists of primary, secondary legal approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in accordance with this research approach is to search for and collect legislation related to elections and then be analyzed qualitatively. The background to the emergence of norms as in Article 4 paragraph (3) PKPU Number 20 Year 2018, KPU has fulfilled legal legitimacy (philosophical, sociological and juridical basis). Position of Article 4 paragraph (3) of PKPU Number 20 of 2018 when only seeing the nature of its independent institution and its authority, the article does not violate any regulation, so it should be accepted by law. However, given the hierarchy of legislation, the article clearly does not comply with the rules for the formation of legislation. Because Article 4 paragraph (3) PKPU Number 2 of 2018 contains a norm which does not have a gap from the general norm in Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. The principles of the formation of laws and regulations adopted in general by PKPU Number 20 of 2018, and specifically by Article 4 paragraph (3) of PKPU Number 20 of 2018, are incomplete. In formal terms, the principle which is not sufficiently fulfilled is the suitability between types, hierarchy, and material content of Article 4 paragraph (3) PKPU Number 20 Year 2018. The principle of this regulation is only to carry out a government affair based on the functions given by the law. Keywords: general election, judges consideration, general election commissions
Abstrak Banyaknya jumlah kendaraan bermotor dikota Surabaya menyebabkan meningkatnya kebutuhan akan bengkel umum. Bengkel Umum meliliki peran dalam mengembalikan kondisi kendaran bermotor agar memenuhi standar laik jalan. Bengkel umum kendaraan bermotor dalam memperbaiki kendaraan memilik klasifikasi mutu tersendiri demi membedakan fungsi serta batasan kesanggupan dalam service kendaraan bermotor. Klasifikasi bengkel umum didapat dengan mendaftarkan izin bengkel tersebut ke Dinas Perizinan. Setelah izin didapat oleh bengkel umum, akan dilakukannya kegiatan pengecekan yang merupakan bentuk pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh dinas perhubungan. Dinas perhubungan memiliki wewenang dalam pengawasan berdasarkan Pasal 60 ayat (5) Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan yang menyatakan bahwa " Pengawasan terhadap bengkel umum Kendaraan Bermotor sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) dilaksanakan oleh pemerintah kabupaten/kota." Tujuan Penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektivitas pengawasan yang dilakunan oleh dinas perhubungan serta mengetahui apa hambatan dinas perhubungan dalam melakukan pengawasan bengkel umum di kota Surabaya. Metode penelitian yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum yuridis sosiologis/empiris, melalui teknik wawancara. Informan yang berasal dari pihak dinas perhubungan yang sebagai pelaksana pengawasan bengkel dan pemilik bengkel kendaraan bermotor yang dipilih oleh peneliti berdasarkan pertimbangan yang dilakukan peneliti, hasil daripenelitian kemudia diolah dengan teknik diskriptif kualitaif, artinya peneliti akan memberikan pemaparan secara factual atas hasil penelitiannya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh dinas perhubungan tidak terlaksana dengan baik. Dalam pelaksanaan pengawasan, dinas perhubungan memiliki hambatan berupa kurangnya informasi mengenai lokasi bengkel. Kurangnya informasi mengenai lokasi bengkel menyebabkan kecepatan kegiatan pengawasan menjadi berkurang. Kata Kunci : efektivitas pengawasan, pengawasan, bengkel umum Abstract The large number of motorized vehicles in the city of Surabaya caused an increase in the need for public workshops. The General Workshop has a role in restoring motorized vehicle conditions to meet roadworthy standards. General motor vehicle workshops in repairing vehicles have their own quality classifications in order to differentiate functions and limitations in the ability of motorized vehicles. Classification of general workshops is obtained by registering the workshop permit to the Licensing Service. After the permit is obtained by a public workshop, checking activities will be carried out, which is a form of supervision carried out by the transportation agency. The transportation agency has oversight authority based on Article 60 paragraph (5) of Law Number 22 Year 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation which states that "Supervision of Motorized Vehicle General workshops as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be carried out by the district/city government."The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of supervision carried out by the transportation agency and to find out what the barriers to transportation services in conducting supervision of public workshops in the city of Surabaya. The research method used in this study is a sociological/empirical juridical legal research method, through interview techniques. Informants who came from the transportation department who were the workshop supervisors and motor vehicle workshop owners were selected by researchers based on the considerations made by the researchers, the results of the research were then processed with qualitative descriptive techniques, meaning researchers would provide factual explanations for the results of their research. The results of the study showed that the implementation of supervision carried out by the transportation office was not well implemented. In the implementation of the supervision, the Department of Transportation has obstacle in the form of lack of information regarding the location of the workshop causing the speed of monitoring activities to decrease. Keywords : effectiveness of supervision, supervision, motorized vehicle general works
AbstrakPeraturan Pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 2012 Tentang Izin Lingkungan pada pasal 2, setiap usaha dan/ kegiatan yang wajib Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan (Amdal) dan UKL-UPL wajib memiliki izin lingkungan. Pada faktanya pelaksanaan di lapangan tidak selalu seperti yang diharapkan pembuat peraturan perundang - undangan. Salah satunya pelaku usaha toko modern di Kabupaten Sampang yang merupakan usaha yang wajib UKL-UPL terbukti masih banyak tidak memiliki Rekomendasi UKL-UPL/ Persetujuan SPPL yang dikeluarkan oleh Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kabupaten/Kota setempat. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis efektivitas penegakan hukum administrasi terhadap izin lingkungan terkait usaha toko modern serta menganalisis kendala yang dihadapi dalam melaksanakan penegakan hukum administrasi terhadap izin lingkungan terkait usaha toko modern di Kabupaten Sampang. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis empiris. Analisis yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas penegakan hukum administrasi terhadap izin lingkungan terkait usaha toko modern di Kabupaten Sampang kurang efektif karena dari kelima faktor efektivitas yang terpenuhi hanya dua unsur saja yaitu faktor hukum dan faktor sarana sedangkan yang tidak terpenuhi ada tiga yaitu faktor penegakan hukum, masyarakat, kebudayaan. Adapun kendala yang dihadapi oleh Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kesatuan Polisi Pamong Praja Kabupaten Sampang dalam melaksanakan proses penegakan hukum administrasi terhadap izin lingkungan terkait usaha toko modern yaitu tingkat kesadaran dari masyarakat masih kurang mengenai peraturan izin lingkungan, serta kekurangan koordinasi Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dengan Kesatuan Polisi Pamong Praja, sehingga Kesatuan Polisi Pamong Praja mendatangi yang berizin dan tidak berizin dengan jumlah aparat penegak hukum yang minimum menjadi tidak seimbang dengan jumlah usaha toko modern yang ada di Kabupaten Sampang.Kata Kunci : efektivitas, penegakan hukum administrasi, izin lingkungan, usaha toko modernAbstractGovernment Regulation Number 27 of 2012 concerning environmental permits in article 2, every business and / or activity those who are required to have Environmental Impact Analysis (EIA) or UKL-UPL must have an environmental permits. In fact, implementation in the field does not always meet the legislators expect. One of them is a modern shop business in Sampang Regency which is a business that obliged to be UKL-UPL proven that there are still many who do not have UKL-UPL Recommendations / SPPL Approval issued by the local Regency / City Environmental Office. The purpose of this research is to analyze the effectiveness of administrative law enforcement on environmental permits related to modern shop business and analyze the obstacles faced in implementing administrative law enforcement on environmental permits related to modern store businesses in Sampang Regency. This study uses a type of empirical juridical research. The analysis used is descriptive qualitative. Data collection is done through interviews and documentation. The results showed that the effectiveness of administrative law enforcement on environmental permits related to modern store businesses in Sampang District was less effective because of the five effectiveness factors, only two elements were fulfilled, which are legal factors and facility factors while those that are not fulfilled there are three namely law enforcement factor, society, culture. The obstacles faced by the Environmental Office and Sampang District Civil Service Police in carrying out the administrative law enforcement process towards environmental permits related to modern store business, which are the awareness level of the community that still lacks against environmental permit regulations, lack of coordination of the Environmental Office with Enforcement Officer of Regional Regulation so that Enforcement Officer of Regional Regulation came to those who were licensed and unauthorized with the minimum number of law enforcement officers being out of balance with the number of modern shop businesses in Sampang Regency.Keywords: effectiveness, administrative law enforcement, environmental permission, modern shop business
Aksi solidaritas 1000 Lilin yang dilaksanakan di berbagai kota, termasuk Surabaya dinilai melanggar ketentuan pembatasan waktu yang tercantum dalam Pasal 7 Perkapolri Nomor 7 Tahun 2012, di mana aksi tersebut dilaksanakan d iatas pukul 18.00 di tempat terbuka, sementara itu dalam Perkapolri tersebut diatur mengenai pembatasan waktu hanya pada pukul 06.00 sampai dengan pukul 18.00 di tempat terbuka, meskipun telah melanggar pembatasan waktu yang telah ditetapkan, aksi solidaritas 1000 lilin di Surabaya dan beberapa kota lainnya masih tetap dilaksanakan. Pengaturan mengenai demonstrasi yaitu UU Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 Juncto Perkapolri Nomor 7 Tahun 2012 menggunakan konsep pemberitahuan di mana konsep tersebut bukan merupakan suatu pembolehan terhadap larangan. Penelitian ini khusus mengkaji kewenangan kepolisian untuk membolehkan aksi demonstrasi tetap dilaksanakan berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, serta akibat hukumnya apabila demonstrasi tersebut dilaksanakan sekalipun melanggar ketentuan batasan atas waktu didalam Perkapolri Nomor 7 Tahun 2012. Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis mengenai kewenangan kepolisian dalam melakukan pembiaran terhadap pelaksanaan demonstrasi di tempat terbuka di atas pukul 18.00 sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, serta akibat hukum apabila demonstrasi yang melebihi batas waktu yang telah ditentukan tetap dilaksanakan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Jenis bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan non hukum. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum adalah studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis menggunakan metode preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kewenangan kepolisian dalam melakukan pembiaran terhadap aksi solidaritas 1000 lilin tidak memiliki kepastian hukum, di mana seharusnya tindakan hukum kepolisian yang berdasarkan kewenangan bebasnya dituangkan dalam izin sebagai bentuk kepastian hukum atas pelaksanaan demonstrasi tersebut. Akibat hukum atas pelaksanaan demonstrasi yang melebihi ketentuan perundang-undangan dan tidak ada izin sebagai bentuk kepastian hukumnya adalah melanggar asas kepastian hukum dalam asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik dan Pasal 510 KUHP, namun dalam pelaksanaannya tidak dikenakan upaya paksa karena kepolisian mempertimbangkan lima prinsip atas penggunaan tindakan kepolisian dalam Pasal 3 Perkapolri Nomor 1 Tahun 2009, di mana aksi demonstrasi tersebut hanya merupakan tindakan pasif yang berjalan dengan damai.kata kunci : demonstrasi, pembatasan waktu, kewenangan bebas, izin.Abstract 'The 1000 Candles' act of solidarity held in various cities, including Surabaya city is considered as violating the time limitation provision contained in Article 7 of Regulation of National Police Chief Number 7 Year 2012, in which the action was held above 6 PM in open area. Meanwhile, according to Regulation of National Police Chief, the time limitation given is only from 6 AM to 6 PM in open area. Therefore, there are still some cities which violating the rules, one of the cities is Surabaya. The regulation of demonstration which is Law Number 9 Year 1998 Juncto. Regulation of National Police Chief Number 7 year 2012 uses notification concept where the concept is not permission for prohibition. This study specifically examines police authority in allowing demonstration to be carried out in accordance with the existed laws and regulations, as well as the legal consequence if the demonstration is violating the time limits provisions in Regulation of National Police Chief Number 7 Year 2012.The purpose of this study is to analyze the authority in conducting demonstration in open area above 6 PM is the authority in accordance with the existed laws and regulations, and legal consequence if the demonstration is held beyond the time limitation provision. The research design used is normative juridical research with statutory approach and concept approach. The types of legal material used consist of primary law, secondary law, and non-law. The technique used to collect the legal materials is literature study technique. Meanwhile, the analysis technique used prescriptive method.The results of the study show the police authority in permitting '1000 candles' act of solidarity does not have legal certainty, whereas the police law of act should be based on authority is set forth in the license as a form of legal certainty over the implementation of the demonstration. The legal consequences for the implementation of demonstrations that exceed the time provisions and had no license as a form of legal certainty are violating the principle of legal certainty in the General Principle of Good Government and Article 510 Criminal Code, but in its implementation, there is no force because the police consider the five principles on the use of police action in Article 3 Regulation of National Police Chief No. 1 Year 2009, where the demonstration is only a passive act that goes peacefully.Keywords: demonstration, time limitation, free authority, permission.
AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dampak sosialisasi kegiatan pemilu oleh KPU Kota Surabaya terhadap partisipasi politik mayarakat dalam Pemilu Gubernur Tahun 2013. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh warga masyarakat Kecamatan Gayungan yang terdaftar sebagai pemilih tetap pada pemilu gubernur tahun 2013. Sampel penelitian adalah 100 orang yang dipilih dengan metode area probability dan cluster sample. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa angket, observasi, dan wawancara. Hasil analisis deskripsi menunjukkan bahwa untuk kegiatan sosialisasi KPU Kota Surabaya pada pemilu gubernur tahun 2013, pelaksanaannya berjalan dengan baik. Partisipasi politik masyarakat Gayungan pada Pilgub 2013 dikategorikan baik. Koefisiensi korelasi antar dua variabel dihitung menggunakan rumus product momment, dengan hasil 0,239 yang berada pada kategori rendah. Jika dipresentasekan diperoleh nilai sebesar 23,9% artinya sosialisasi yang dilakukan KPU Kota Surabaya mempengaruhi partisipasi politik masyarakat Gayungan pada Pemilu Gubernur tahun 2013 sebesar 23,9%, sedangkan 76,1% dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain yang tidak diteliti. Nilai t hitung (1,99) > t tabel (1,98), dengan demikian hipotesis yang berbunyi: "sosialisasi kegiatan Pemilu oleh KPU Kota Surabaya berpengaruh terhadap partisipasi politik masyarakat dalam Pemilu Gubernur Tahun 2013" diterima.Kata kunci : strategi sosialisasi, partisipasi politik.AbstractThis study aims to determine the impact of socialization of the elections by the Election Commission of Surabaya against society 's political participation in the election of Governors in 2013 . Study was a descriptive study with a quantitative approach . The study population were all citizens of the District Gayungan registered as voters remain in the governor election in 2013 . In this study, using a sample area and sample groups , the study sample was 100 people registered as voters . Research instruments such as questionnaires , observation , and interviews . The results of the analysis indicate that the description for the socialization of Surabaya City Election Commission on governor elections in 2013 , its implementation is going well. Political participation in society Gayungan Pilgub 2013 well categorized . Coefficient of correlation between two variables was calculated using the formula product momment , with results that are .239 in the low category . If dipresentasekan obtained a value of 23.9 % means that socialization Commission Surabaya affect political participation in society Gayungan governor election in 2013 of 23.9 % . T value ( 1.99 ) > t table ( 1.98 ) , so the hypothesis that reads : " socialization of Elections by the Election Commission of Surabaya has no effect on the political participation of the people in the governor election in 2013 " .Keywords : strategy socialization , political participation .
