5 vor Geschäftsvorfälle erfassen und zu Abschlüssen führen: Endspurt zur Bilanzbuchhalterprüfung
In: NWB Bilanzbuchhalter
202 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: NWB Bilanzbuchhalter
In: Beiträge zur Basler Geschichte
World Affairs Online
In: Forschungspapiere "Probleme der Öffentlichen Verwaltung in Mittel- und Osteuropa" 8
In: Schweizer Schriften zum Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht 155
Introduction1. Bearing Arms2. The Death Penalty3. Our Unsuspected Sin4. Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?5. Liberty Must have Limits6. The Betrayal of Women7. Ordination or submission-orBoth?8. Addicted to Affirmation9. Homelessness and Heartlessness10. Ecology or Ecomania?
In: Betriebswirtschaftliche Abhandlungen
In: N.F. 79
In: Bochumer Beiträge zur Unternehmungsführung und Unternehmensforschung 26
In: Global change, peace & security, S. 1-7
ISSN: 1478-1166
In: Australian journal of international affairs: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 77, Heft 6, S. 664-669
ISSN: 1465-332X
In: International politics reviews, Band 10, Heft 1-2, S. 68-75
ISSN: 2050-2990
In: Globalizations, Band 18, Heft 6, S. 947-965
ISSN: 1474-774X
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 64, Heft 3, S. 641-648
ISSN: 1468-2478
AbstractThis Theory Note focuses on the resurgent interest in relationalism in constructivist IR theory. I begin by contextualizing current efforts to move constructivism toward this theoretical register. In particular, I focus on the framing influence of Mustafa Emirbayer's "Manifesto for a Relational Sociology," showing how key theoretical concerns articulated there have resonated with the constructivist critique of rationalist and structuralist explanatory approaches in IR. These cross-purposes, however, also signal that the lacunae identified by Emirbayer should be of interest to IR constructivists seeking to promote a relationalist research project. I argue that in particular Emirbayer's identification of a gap on normative implications has not received adequate attention in IR debates. In the second part, I discuss Honneth's recognition theoretic approach as promising for supplementing a normative register that satisfies the "process-ontological" proclivities of relationalism as understood by IR constructivists. In the final part, I outline by way of an example some of the meta-theoretical and methodological implications of this version of recognition theory, contrast it with contending arguments in current debates, and commend its potential.