Suchergebnisse

SINCE 1985, THE INFLUENTIAL INTERIM COMMITTEE OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND (IMF) HAS MADE FREQUENT NOTE OF THE OPINIONS AND PROPOSALS WHICH ENDEAVORS TO REPRESENT THE INTERESTS OF THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES IN ISSUES OF MONETARY MANAGEMENT AND REFORM-THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL GROUP OF TWENTYFOUR. THIS PAPER PRESENTS SOME OF THE FACTORS WHICH HAVE SHAPED THE STANCE AND PROFILE OF THE GROUP. NEXT, IT BRIEFLY TRACES THE DEVELOPMENTS AT THREE LEVELS WHICH HAVE SHAPED THE EVOLUTION AND THE OPERATION OF THE GROUP. THEN IT DISCUSSES SOME OF THE REFORM PROPOSALS PRESENTED BY THE GROUP.

Over the past two decades the functions of international economic institutions have greatly expanded to include programs & policies that affect a wider range of people, groups, & organizations than before. Where previously people could hold their national governments to account for such policies, they must now look to international institutions where the decisions are being made. But to whom are these institutions accountable & are they accountable to those whom they directly affect? This paper sets out to answer that question with respect to the IMF, the World Bank, & the WTO. After analyzing the new intrusiveness of the WTO, the IMF, & the World Bank, we explore how the concept of accountability might best be applied to international economic institutions. The paper then outlines the specific ways in which the IMF, World Bank, & WTO have recently bolstered their accountability through enhanced transparency & monitoring. In conclusion, however, the paper argues that in spite of improvements in accountability, the international economic institutions have not gone far enough in reforming their governance structures. There is a remaining imbalance between what they do & their legitimacy as perceived by those they affect. 1 picture, 20 References. Adapted from the source document.

THE AUTHORS EXPLORE THE TWO-WAY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GLOBALIZATION AND INEQUALITY. THEY DISCUSS HOW AND WHY LIBERALS IGNORE OR DOWNPLAY INEQUALITY AND ARGUE THAT GLOBALIZATION CAN ONLY BE UNDERSTOOD BY INVESTIGATING SUCH FACTORS AS STATE STRENGTH, THE POWER RELATIONS UNDERPINNING INSTITUTIONS, THE SOURCES OF VALUES AND NORMS, THE RULES OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY, AND THE POWER POLITICS OF THE SUPPOSED TRANSNATIONAL CIVIL SOCIETY.

ABSTRACTData for 425 sampling locations in England and Wales, covering the 1987 bathing season, were analysed against a range of six water‐quality standards used by European and North American agencies. The following order of relative stringency was established: EEC guide level > US Environmental Protection Agency† > Toronto†> Canadian Federal† > Modified EEC standard > EEC imperative level†.All European Community (EC) countries, at present abiding by the'imperative'bacteriological standards of the bathing waters Directive, would experience a significant increase in non‐compliance for the faecal coliform parameter if standards were altered from the current EEC imperative criteria to any of the existing alternative beach management standards.

BMWFW (Austria) ; FWF (Austria) ; FNRS (Belgium) ; FWO (Belgium) ; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) ; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) ; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) ; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) ; MES (Bulgaria) ; CERN ; CAS (China) ; MoST (China) ; NSFC (China) ; COLCIENCIAS (Colombia) ; MSES (Croatia) ; CSF (Croatia) ; RPF (Cyprus) ; SENESCYT (Ecuador) ; MoER (Estonia) ; ERC IUT (Estonia) ; ERDF (Estonia) ; Academy of Finland (Finland) ; MEC (Finland) ; HIP (Finland) ; CEA (France) ; CNRS/IN2P3 (France) ; BMBF (Germany) ; DFG (Germany) ; HGF (Germany) ; GSRT (Greece) ; OTKA (Hungary) ; NIH (Hungary) ; DAE (India) ; DST (India) ; IPM (Iran) ; SFI (Ireland) ; INFN (Italy) ; MSIP (Republic of Korea) ; NRF (Republic of Korea) ; LAS (Lithuania) ; MOE (Malaysia) ; UM (Malaysia) ; BUAP (Mexico) ; CINVESTAV (Hungary) ; CONACYT (Hungary) ; LNS (Hungary) ; SEP (Hungary) ; UASLP-FAI (Mexico) ; MBIE (New Zealand) ; PAEC (Pakistan) ; MSHE (Poland) ; NSC (Poland) ; FCT (Portugal) ; JINR (Dubna) ; MON (Russia) ; RosAtom (Russia) ; RAS (Russia) ; RFBR (Russia) ; MESTD (Serbia) ; SEIDI (Spain) ; CPAN (Spain) ; Swiss Funding Agencies (Switzerland) ; MST (Taipei) ; ThEPCenter (Thailand) ; IPST (Thailand) ; STAR (Thailand) ; NSTDA (Thailand) ; TUBITAK (Turkey) ; TAEK (Turkey) ; NASU (Ukraine) ; SFFR (Ukraine) ; STFC (United Kingdom) ; DOE (U.S.A.) ; NSF (U.S.A.) ; Marie-Curie program ; European Research Council ; EPLANET (European Union) ; Leventis Foundation ; A.P. Sloan Foundation ; Alexander von Humboldt Foundation ; Belgian Federal Science Policy Office ; Fonds pour la Formation a la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture (FRIA-Belgium) ; Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie (IWT-Belgium) ; Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS) of the Czech Republic ; Council of Science and Industrial Research, India ; HOMING PLUS program of the Foundation for Polish Science ; European Union ; Regional Development Fund ; Mobility Plus program of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education ; National Science Center (Poland) ; Thalis program - EU-ESF ; Aristeia program - EU-ESF ; National Priorities Research Program by Qatar National Research Fund ; Programa Clarin-COFUND del Principado de Asturias ; Rachadapisek Sompot Fund for Postdoctoral Fellowship (Thailand) ; Chulalongkorn University (Thailand) ; Chulalongkorn Academic into Its 2nd Century Project Advancement Project (Thailand) ; Welch Foundation ; Thalis program - Greek NSRF ; Aristeia program - Greek NSRF ; Science and Technology Facilities Council ; National Science Center (Poland): 2014/14/M/ST2/00428 ; National Science Center (Poland): Opus 2013/11/B/ST2/04202 ; National Science Center (Poland): 2014/13/B/ST2/02543 ; National Science Center (Poland): 2014/15/B/ST2/03998 ; National Science Center (Poland): Sonatabis 2012/07/E/ST2/01406 ; Welch Foundation: C-1845 ; Science and Technology Facilities Council: ST/K001256/1 ; Science and Technology Facilities Council: ST/N000250/1 ; Science and Technology Facilities Council: GRIDPP ; Science and Technology Facilities Council: CMS ; A search for heavy resonances that decay to tau lepton pairs is performed using proton-proton collisions at root s = 13 TeV. The data were collected with the CMS detector at the CERN LHC and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 2.2 fb(-1). The observations are in agreement with standard model predictions. An upper limit at 95% confidence level on the product of the production cross section and branching fraction into tau lepton pairs is calculated as a function of the resonance mass. For the sequential standard model, the presence of Z' bosons decaying into tau lepton pairs is excluded for Z/ masses below 2.1 TeV, extending previous limits for this final state. For the topcolor-assisted technicolor model, which predicts Z' bosons that preferentially couple to third-generation fermions, Z' masses below 1.7 TeV are excluded, representing the most stringent limit to date.