Competencies for Work Domains in Business Computer Science
In: European journal of work and organizational psychology: the official journal of The European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Band 7, Heft 4, S. 517-531
ISSN: 1464-0643
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: European journal of work and organizational psychology: the official journal of The European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Band 7, Heft 4, S. 517-531
ISSN: 1464-0643
In: Employee relations, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 63-79
ISSN: 1758-7069
The Netherlands, although a small country with few natural resources, is a major industrial power in the West, and operates some of the world's largest multinationals. To understand more about human resource management (HRM) practices in this country we used a structured interview format containing questions about selection techniques, equal employment opportunity, performance appraisal, motivational techniques, and participative decision making, and we interviewed 30 HRM professionals. Results show that creative research‐based HRM practices are helping organizations to adapt to global economic challenges, but it has not been easy to balance the needs of employers with those of employees in a country with a history of workers' rights.
In: The leadership quarterly: an international journal of political, social and behavioral science, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 591-603
In: The leadership quarterly: an international journal of political, social and behavioral science, Band 23, Heft 5, S. 835-848
In: Group & organization management: an international journal, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 297-309
ISSN: 1552-3993
Dutch managers and computer programmers appraised the performance of a subordinate or peer, respectively, using Behavioral Observation scales (BOS), Behavioral Expectation scales (BES), and Trait scales, and then evaluated the three appraisal instruments on eight criteria: ability to give feedback, ability to differentiate, objectivity, position differences, ability to provide training, setting corporate-wide standards, ability to set goals, and overall ease of use. Users preferred the BOS to the BES on seven criteria, and to the Trait Scale on all but two criteria. They preferred the Trait Scale to the BES on two criteria, namely, ease of use and position differences, and considered the BES and Trait scale equivalent on the remaining criteria. These findings parallel those found in a similar study conducted in the United States.
In: The leadership quarterly: an international journal of political, social and behavioral science, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 17-38