Suchergebnisse

ZusammenfassungIm Säuglings- und Kleinkindalter gehören IgE-vermittelte Nahrungsmittelallergien zu den häufigsten allergischen Erkrankungen. Insbesondere die orale Nahrungsmittelprovokation stellt hier einen Grundpfeiler einer fundierten Diagnostik dar. Der Goldstandard ist die doppelblinde, Placebo-kontrollierte Nahrungsmittelprovokation (DBPCFC; double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge). Sie hilft, v. a. bei unklarer Anamnese, die klinische Relevanz einer Sensibilisierung gegen Nahrungsmittel zu überprüfen oder neu zu evaluieren. Im Säuglings- und Kleinkindalter ist eine genaue Diagnostik besonders relevant, um unnötig einschränkende Eliminationsdiäten zu vermeiden oder den Patienten bzw. deren Eltern hinsichtlich einer individuell angepassten spezifischen Ernährungstherapie zu beraten. Dieser Artikel beschreibt praktische Vorgehensweisen für die Durchführung oraler Nahrungsmittelprovokationen im Kindesalter mit Fokus auf die am häufigsten vorkommenden IgE-vermittelten Nahrungsmittelallergien (Kuhmilch, Hühnerei, Erdnuss).

To access publisher's full text version of this article, please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field or click on the hyperlink at the top of the page marked Files ; The conduct of oral food challenges as the preferred diagnostic standard for food allergy (FA) was harmonized over the last years. However, documentation and interpretation of challenge results, particularly in research settings, are not sufficiently standardized to allow valid comparisons between studies. Our aim was to develop a diagnostic toolbox to capture and report clinical observations in double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC). ; A group of experienced allergists, paediatricians, dieticians, epidemiologists and data managers developed generic case report forms and standard operating procedures for DBPCFCs and piloted them in three clinical centres. The follow-up of the EuroPrevall/iFAAM birth cohort and other iFAAM work packages applied these methods. ; A set of newly developed questionnaire or interview items capture the history of FA. Together with sensitization status, this forms the basis for the decision to perform a DBPCFC, following a standardized decision algorithm. A generic form including details about severity and timing captures signs and symptoms observed during or after the procedures. In contrast to the commonly used dichotomous outcome FA vs no FA, the allergy status is interpreted in multiple categories to reflect the complexity of clinical decision-making. ; The proposed toolbox sets a standard for improved documentation and harmonized interpretation of DBPCFCs. By a detailed documentation and common terminology for communicating outcomes, these tools hope to reduce the influence of subjective judgment of supervising physicians. All forms are publicly available for further evolution and free use in clinical and research settings. ; European Union within the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (iFAAM) UK Food Standards Agency Nutricia Ltd ...