Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
12 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Routledge Library Editions: Work and Society Series
Britain experienced the impact of recession more immediately and sharply; over one million factory jobs were lost. Originally published in 1983 and now reissued iwth a new Preface by the author, this book points to the industries, corporations and places in which job losses occurred between 1976 and 1981.
In: Political geography: an interdisciplinary journal for all students of political studies with an interest in the geographical and spatial aspects, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 73-74
ISSN: 0962-6298
In: Regional studies: official journal of the Regional Studies Association, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 225-251
ISSN: 1360-0591
In: Regional studies, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 225-251
ISSN: 0034-3404
In: Regional science policy and practice: RSPP, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 49-68
ISSN: 1757-7802
AbstractIn contrast with prevailing international trends and the European Union orthodoxy, the English regional map, a prominent feature of strategic development policy during 2000–2010, has since been expunged. This paper examines 'functional' spatial coalitions and their choice as the intended surrogates for formal regions. Informed by a mixed‐method research methodology, the paper challenges the claim that this mosaic of voluntaristic public‐private coalitions represents plausible realizations of functional regions. Indeed, the research reveals a noteworthy correlation with geographical antecedents, emphasizing the importance of the legacy of past sub‐national forms of governance maintained by some enduring spatial coalitions. Flowing from this analysis, the implications for policy are discussed.
In: Urban research & practice: journal of the European Urban Research Association, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 157-174
ISSN: 1753-5077
In: SAIS review / the Johns Hopkins Foreign Policy Institute of the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS): a journal of international affairs, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 183-197
ISSN: 1946-4444
World Affairs Online
In: Urban studies, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 133-146
ISSN: 1360-063X
In: Journal of leisure research: JLR, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 1-14
ISSN: 2159-6417
In: International journal of sustainability in higher education, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 19-33
ISSN: 1758-6739
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe four phases for how universities have addressed a sustainability agenda and offer specific lessons for how and where experiences on one campus, the University of Colorado Boulder, have been met with success and other challenges. The authors offer general reflections for executing university‐wide sustainability initiatives with a central intent of illuminating central barriers against, and incentives for, a coordinated and integrated approach to campus sustainability.Design/methodology/approachThe approach for arriving at four phases and a description of the University of Colorado Boulder is based on experiences from learning, teaching, and administering within universities–collectively for almost a century among the authors–and lessons from "war room" discussions.FindingsSustainability initiatives on campus may evolve through a series of phases labeled: grassroots; executive acceptance of the business case for sustainability; the visionary campus leader; and fully self‐actualized and integrated campus community. The University of Colorado Boulder, while a leader in many respects of sustainability (research, student activities, facilities management) has experienced serious challenges for coordination.Originality/valueThe four phases are a relatively novel contribution for the specific literature on sustainability education. Second, the tangible examples from University of Colorado Boulder demonstrate how coordination is difficult in these situations; these examples allow readers to better relate to and understand such challenges. Finally, the authors reflect on central issues according to three categories: self‐reflection, recommendations, and advantages.