Cold comfort for China in a sullen Tibet
In: U.S. news & world report, Band 95, S. 43-46
ISSN: 0041-5537
33 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: U.S. news & world report, Band 95, S. 43-46
ISSN: 0041-5537
In: U.S. news & world report, Band 94, S. 35-36
ISSN: 0041-5537
In: U.S. news & world report, Band 93, S. 27-28
ISSN: 0041-5537
In: U.S. news & world report, Band 93, S. 22-25
ISSN: 0041-5537
In: U.S. news & world report, Band 93, S. 16-17
ISSN: 0041-5537
Coconino Citizens Association meeting minutes, 1977, about the "Save the Peaks" controversy in Flagstaff, Arizona and other Northern Arizona issues. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
BASE
Minutes from Coconino Citizens Association meetings, 1976, regarding issues in Northern Arizona, and the "Save the Peaks" controversy. The controversy concerns the development of Hart Prairie in the San Francisco Peaks region. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
BASE
Minutes and notes from meetings, 1974, about the "Save the Peaks" controversy in Flagstaff, Ariz., concerning development of Hart Prairie in the San Francisco Peaks region. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
BASE
Notes, papers, and correspondence related to the "Save the Peaks" controversy in Flagstaff, Arizona. Controversy concerned the development of Hart Prairie in the San Francisco Peaks region. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
BASE
Collection of articles, fliers and advertisements concerning the Save the Peaks controversy over the Hart Prairie development and Snow Bowl expansion. Includes the program for the Save the Peaks benefit concert featuring Jackson Browne and the Nitty Gritty Dirt Band. The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
BASE
A collection of Arizona Daily Sun newspaper articles and letters to the editor regarding the "Save the Peaks" controversy in Flagstaff, Arizona. The controversy concerned the development of Hart Prairie in the San Francisco Peaks area. The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
BASE
A statement submitted by Walter and Nancy Taylor, in opposition to the latest zoning request by Summit Properties in regards to their land in Hart Prarie, Coconino County, Arizona, 1974. Also includes a statement on behalf of the Coconino Citizens Association in opposition to the General Plan for Coconino County, 1975. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
BASE
A statement submitted by Walter and Nancy Taylor, in opposition to the latest zoning request by Summit Properties in regards to their land in Hart Prarie, Coconino County, Arizona, 1974. Also includes a statement on behalf of the Coconino Citizens Association in opposition to the General Plan for Coconino County, 1975. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
BASE
State of Arizona legislature on the exchange of state land, 1975; and San Francisco Peaks opportunities for use and management, 1971.
BASE
A questionnaire from the Concerned Citizens for the Preservation of Hart Prairie and a questionnaire from the Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission, regarding the "Save the Peaks" controversy. The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
BASE