A Not-So World Wide Web: The Internet, China, and the Challenges to Nondemocratic Rule
In: Political communication: an international journal, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 255-272
ISSN: 1091-7675
7 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Political communication: an international journal, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 255-272
ISSN: 1091-7675
In: Political communication, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 255-272
ISSN: 1058-4609
In: Political communication, Band 15, S. 255-272
ISSN: 1058-4609
Examines the attraction of the Internet to the government as a key to development and influence, strategies of containment taken by the Communist Party to make it politically reliable, and the impact of these measures on full use of the Internet.
In: Nations and nationalism: journal of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 251-272
ISSN: 1354-5078
In: Asian perspective, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 105-140
ISSN: 0258-9184
World Affairs Online
In: Asian perspective, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 105-140
ISSN: 2288-2871
In: Nations and nationalism: journal of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 251-271
ISSN: 1469-8129
Abstract. In recent years, numerous states have become racked with internal secessionist strife. Why have calls for independence by regional subgroupings been heeded even after long periods of inter‐ethnic peace or in regions without any previous history of secessionist activity? I contend that this question can be answered by examining the phenomenon of loss‐gain framing, in which people are motivated to adopt risky stratagems, like secession, due to fears of unacceptable losses.This article examines the enigma of why most white American Southerners in 1861 willingly fought for the establishment of the Confederacy, a nation based upon slavery, despite the fact that most Southerners did not own slaves and had continuously rejected secessionist appeals for years. Confederate President Jefferson Davis overcame this reluctance by emphasising what all Southerners – slaveholder and non‐slaveholder alike – would lose by remaining in the United States rather than accentuating what would be gained by secession.