Globalization and poverty*
In: Routledge Studies in International Business and the World Economy; Trade, Globalization and Poverty, S. 9-32
78 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Routledge Studies in International Business and the World Economy; Trade, Globalization and Poverty, S. 9-32
In: The Future of Globalization, S. 105-144
This book provides a historical perspective of the Uruguay Round agreement and focuses on the interaction between the developed and developing countries on matters relating to the global trading system and its disciplines since the founding of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
In: Princeton studies in international economics 90
In: Center discussion paper 755
In: Center discussion paper 554
In: Harry G. Johnson Memorial Lecture 3
In: Journal of human development and capabilities: a multi-disciplinary journal for people-centered development, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 418-423
ISSN: 1945-2837
In: Asian Development Review, Band 30 No. 1, Heft 2013
SSRN
In: Asian Development Review, Band 30, Heft 1
SSRN
In: Stanford journal of international law, Band 46, Heft 2, S. 199-219
ISSN: 0731-5082
In: Debates on the Measurement of Global Poverty, S. 143-153
In: The Pakistan development review: PDR, Band 44, Heft 4I, S. 479-503
This paper, begins with a discussion of the well-known issues
involved in defining and measuring total factor productivity (TFP) and
its contribution to growth (as well as the possible contribution of
growth to productivity), the economic theory underpinning productivity,
and policies that impact on and influence changes in productivity. It is
followed by, first, a selective discussion of the studies on
cross-country variation in productivity levels and growth, and then the
experience of South Asia and China in a comparative perspective across
the region and across the developing world. The share of South Asia in
global GDP and its growth has remained stagnant since the early
nineties. Disturbingly, except India, the rest of South Asia experienced
a decline in TFP growth between 1989-95 and 1995-2003. The paper
concludes that for achieving sustained productivity growth,
well-functioning social and economic institutions are important, since
through their incentive structure they influence, labour force
participation, savings and accumulation of human and physical capital,
risk-taking and innovation as well as efficiency of resource allocation.
Public policies, particularly macro-economic, foreign trade and
investment policies, matter a great deal.
In: The American journal of economics and sociology, Band 64, Heft 1, S. 399-405
ISSN: 1536-7150
Abstract A comment on the article by William D. Nordhaus in this volume.