Suchergebnisse

Objective: The goal of this research was to analyze if disparities in route of hysterectomy for endometrial cancer exist in Florida. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, Florida inpatient and ambulatory surgery databases (2014–2016) were examined to find cases of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy in the state. Logistic regression models were used to compare patient- and hospital-level factors associated with having minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open surgery, and complications in patients having open hysterectomy versus MIS. Results: Overall, 6513 patients met the inclusion criteria. MIS was performed in 81.4% of cases. The odds of using a minimally invasive approach to hysterectomy (vaginal, robotic, or laparoscopic) were significantly lower for black women (odds ratio [OR]: 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34–0.50) as well as for other non-white patients (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.49–0.84). Patients with Medicaid (OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.30–0.59) or Medicare managed care (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59–0.91), or who received care at a teaching hospital (OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68–0.98) or government hospital (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.38–0.65) were also less likely to receive MIS. Patients receiving care at a high-volume (OR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.30–2.20) or medium-volume (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 2.37–4.08) hospital, or patients who were located in the Central (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.17–2.48) or Peninsula (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.17–2.56) regions, compared to the Florida Panhandle, had greater odds of receiving MIS. Conclusions: Although Florida has a high adoption of MIS for treating endometrial cancer, disparities persist. Efforts of state-level entities should focus on improving access to minimally invasive hysterectomy for racial minorities with endometrial cancer.