Suchergebnisse

O artigo centra sua análise sobre a atuação complexa e, às vezes, ambígua do Ministério Público no atual Sistema de Justiça Brasileiro. O texto busca, em um primeiro momento, definir o novo perfil da Instituição na Constituição Federal de 1988 e revisar as principais teorias críticas acerca da atuação dos seus Membros. Após, por meio de um esforço interdisciplinar e com o auxílio do método etnográfico, fazendo uso das técnicas de observação participante e entrevistas não-diretivas, os autores realizam um mergulho nas práticas institucionais dentro e fora de um processo judicial em busca de atendimento em saúde para uma criança. Desse mergulho emergem as tramas decorrentes das referidas práticas e seus desdobramentos, que indicam um movimento complexo e multifacetado invisível aos olhos desatentos e aos consensos naturalizados. Como resultado, temos evidenciada uma instituição transformadora da realidade social e, simultaneamente, reprodutora das tradicionais estruturas de poder: ora é emancipatória; ora, tutelar. Assim, o artigo constitui-se em um convite à reflexão a fim de que se possa perceber onde, como e quando o Ministério Público demonstra seus potenciais e, ao mesmo tempo, suas fragilidades.Palavras-chave: Cidadania. Interdisciplinaridade. Ministério Público. Práticas jurídicas.ABSTRACTThe article focuses its analysis on the complex and, sometimes, ambiguous operation of the Department of Public Prosecution in the present Brazilian Justice System. The text seeks, at first, to set the new profile of the Institution in the Federal Constitution of 1988 and to review the major critical theories about the performance of its Members. Then, through an interdisciplinary effort and with the help of the ethnographic method, making use of the techniques of participant observation and non-directive interviews, the authors dive into institutional practices, both in and out of a lawsuit demanding health care for a child. From this dive emerge the plots resulting from the practices and their consequences, indicating a complex and multifaceted movement which is invisible to inattentive eyes and naturalized consensus. As a result, evidence of an institution transforming social reality and, simultaneously, reproducing the traditional structures of power: sometimes emancipatory, others tutelary. Thus, the article is in an invitation to reflection in order to perceive where, how and when the Department of Public Prosecution demonstrates its potential and, at the same time, its weaknesses.Keywords: Citizenship. Interdisciplinarity. Department of Public Prosecution. Legal practice.

The tests were performed with a biostimulant (GAAP) containing yeast extract and amino acids. The yield data of the off-season corn for meta-analysis were collected from 41 trials conducted in the states of Paraná, São Paulo, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, and Goiás during the 2013/2014 crop season. The tests consisted of eight treatments, with four replicates per treatment, and were conducted on 3.6 × 6.0 m plots. The treatments consisted of application of biostimulant at 2.0 L ha-1 at different times and the control (no biostimulant). The time of application corresponded to the growth stages, V8, VT, R1, (V8 + VT), (V8 + R1), (VT + R1), and (V8 + VT + R1). The influence of biostimulant application was quantified as the difference in yield, expressed as kilogram per hectare (kg ha-1), between treatments and the control (effect measurements). Meta-analysis was used to study the effects of the treatments and to calculate the probability of yield increase with product use. The meta-analysis was performed using the software R. The random effects model was used for meta-analysis because of the high heterogeneity among the studies. Next, the mixed effect model was applied to explain the high heterogeneity, considering the following subgroups: the number of applications, the timing of applications, the presence of water stress, and the region where the tests were conducted. The probability of yield increase was calculated at the levels of 2, 5, and 10 bags, each of 60 kg ha-1. The meta-analysis results for the variable "General" and the subgroups were significantly positive (p < 0.0001), with a meta-analytic estimate of 342.1 kg ha-1 and the confidence interval for 95% probability ranging between 301.2 kg ha-1 and 383.0 kg ha-1. The probability for yield greater than zero or equal to 2, 5, and 10 bags of 60 kg ha-1 in subgroup "three applications" was 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 38.9%, respectively. These same values were estimated at 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 39.0% for the variable "applications in V8 + VT + R1"; 79.1%, 69.3%, 50.1%, and 21.1% for the variable "trials under stress condition"; and 84.2%, 75.1%, 57.7%, and 26.9% for the variable "investments made in Southern Brazil," respectively. The meta-analysis of the data from 287 effect measurements generated in 41 trials demonstrated that foliar application of GAAP biostimulant increases corn yield by 342.1 kg ha-1 with 83.7% probability of positive response.