Suchergebnisse

Frontmatter -- Inhalt -- Danksagung -- 1. Einleitung -- 2. Städtische soziale Bewegungen zwischen Neoliberalisierung und Postdemokratie -- 2.1 Stadt, Urbanität, soziale Bewegungen -- 2.2 Recht auf und durch die Stadt -- 2.3 Neoliberale Urbanisierung und ökonomische Krise(n) -- 2.4 Die postpolitische Stadt in der Krise repräsentativer Demokratie -- 2.5 Städtische soziale Bewegungen als Demokratisierungsbewegungen -- 3. Hegemonietheorie. Postfundamentalistische Forschungsperspektive -- 3.1 Laclau und Mouffe. Hegemonietheorie revisited -- 3.2 Postfundamentalistische Operationalisierung -- 4. Methodisches Vorgehen -- 4.1 Auswahl empirischer Fälle -- 4.2 Ethik und Praxis der Forschung -- 4.3 Erhebung und Analyse des empirischen Materials -- 5. Städtischer Protest. Diskurse und Spannungsfelder -- 5.1 Nicht nur Mietenproteste – Von der Mietenstopp-Demonstration zum Berliner Ratschlag -- 5.2 Stadtplanung aufhalten und selber machen -- 5.3 Konflikte in der Kreativen Stadt – Proteste von Kunstund Kulturschaffenden -- 5.4 You can't evict a movement – Proteste von Refugees -- 5.5 Nach Occupy Wall Street – Horizontale Freiräume, Aktionen und Netzwerke in New York -- 5.6 Bedrohlicher Shelter-Industrial Complex – Von Rent Freeze, Homelessness und Community Land Trusts -- 6. Stadtpolitische Proteststrukturen -- 6.1 Postautonome Forderungsstrukturen -- 6.2 Postidentitäre Subjektivierungsstrukturen -- 6.3 Postpolitische Kontraritätsstrukturen -- 7. Konvergenzen und Demokratisierung. Eine neue Phase städtischen Protests -- 7.1 Konvergenzen. Stadtpolitischer Raum und Gegenhegemonie -- 7.2 Demokratisierungen. (Stadt-)Politik von Unten -- 7.3 Resümee. Demokratisierung-durch-die-Stadt-Bewegungen -- 8. Schlussbetrachtungen und Ausblick -- Abkürzungsverzeichnis -- Abbildungsverzeichnis -- Bibliographie

Städtische Proteste haben Hochkonjunktur. Mieter_innen, Kunst- und Kulturschaffende, Studierende, Wohnungslose und Geflüchtete melden sich zu Wort und fordern jenseits ihrer partikularen Bedürfnisse direkte Teilhabe an politischen Entscheidungen ein. Am Beispiel der Metropolen Berlin und New York zeigt David Scheller, wie sich städtische soziale Bewegungen zwischen 2011 und 2015 konstituieren und damit dringliche Themenfelder politisieren und verbinden. Ausgehend von einer hegemonietheoretischen Diskursanalyse der vielstimmigen Protestartikulationen schlägt er eine Interpretation von Möglichkeitsräumen zur Demokratisierung in der Postdemokratie vor, die für diese neue Phase städtischen Protests ausschlaggebend sind.

This article critically examines the governing of 'sustainable urban development' through self-build cohousing groups in Gothenburg and Hamburg. The two case cities have been selected because both are currently involved in major urban restructuring, and have launched programmes to support self-build groups and cohousing as part of their emphasis on promoting urban sustainable development through this process. Departing from a theoretical discussion on advanced liberal urban governance, focusing in particular on the contemporary discourse on sustainable urban development, we examine the interaction between political institutions, civil society and private actors in the construction of cohousing as a perceived novel and alternative form of housing that may contribute to fulfilling certain sustainability goals. Questions centre on the socio-political contextualization of cohousing; concepts of sustainability; strategies of, and relations between, different actors in promoting cohousing; gentrification and segregation; and inclusion and exclusion. In conclusion we argue that, while self-build groups can provide pockets of cohousing as an alternative to dominant forms of housing, the economic and political logics of advanced liberal urban development make even such a modest target difficult, particularly when it comes to making such housing affordable.

AbstractThis article critically examines the governing of 'sustainable urban development' through self‐build cohousing groups in Gothenburg and Hamburg. The two case cities have been selected because both are currently involved in major urban restructuring, and have launched programmes to support self‐build groups and cohousing as part of their emphasis on promoting urban sustainable development through this process. Departing from a theoretical discussion on advanced liberal urban governance, focusing in particular on the contemporary discourse on sustainable urban development, we examine the interaction between political institutions, civil society and private actors in the construction of cohousing as a perceived novel and alternative form of housing that may contribute to fulfilling certain sustainability goals. Questions centre on the socio‐political contextualization of cohousing; concepts of sustainability; strategies of, and relations between, different actors in promoting cohousing; gentrification and segregation; and inclusion and exclusion. In conclusion we argue that, while self‐build groups can provide pockets of cohousing as an alternative to dominant forms of housing, the economic and political logics of advanced liberal urban development make even such a modest target difficult, particularly when it comes to making such housing affordable.

DISCLAIMER: The present Project Deliverable has been submitted to the European Commission for review. The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Co-designing Citizen Social Science for Collective Action (CoAct) is a Horizon 2020 project which aims to provide and further develop methodologies supporting an understanding of research that can equally be led by academic researchers or citizen groups. As part of that process, CoAct aims to support the United Nations fifth Sustainable Development Goal on gender equality by supporting civic organizations making use of CSS methods for gender-based projects. In this document, we set out a resolution report of the Open Call "Gender Equality", which application process opened on the 1st of July 2021 and ended on the 30th September 2021. We present first the course of the planning process of the Open Calls as discussed within the CoAct consortium; second the Open Calls processes itself; third an overview of the applications and selected grantees; fourth, we present our communication strategy; and fifth open up for some critical self-reflections of the Open Call process and how to adjust the procedure towards transdisciplinary, transregional and transcultural Open Calls for the future. Therefore, this document might be of interest for individuals and organisations interested in carrying out their own open call, particularly in the areas of CSS and gender equality. Finally, we summarize the work done thus far and point out further activities which are planned for the remaining project time with the grantees. Eventually, grantees were selected for each of the Open Calls on "Gender Equality". Three projects ranging from the fields of women of Color empowerment, trans-gender and non-binary ...

DISCLAIMER: The present Project Deliverable has been submitted to the European Commission for review. The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. The CoAct (Co-designing Citizen Social Science for Collective Action) project proposes to face social global issues by placing citizens in a vulnerable situation at the centre of the research. This approach represents a new understanding of Citizen Social Science (CSS), as participatory research co-designed with citizen groups sharing a social concern. Along these lines, there exists an important need to provide spaces for academic researchers not only to increase their knowledge and their skills but also to learn about new methods to develop a citizen science that enhances social dimension. Covid situation has obliged to run the school in an online format. The online format has motivated the choice to organise a rather long school (two weeks duration, 9 school days) and to have a daily concentrated routine scheduled during the afternoon. Considering positive aspects related to the COVID situation, the online format has allowed to have a wider diversity of participants and a larger number of participants (39) that were initially anticipated. Participants were coming from 20 different countries. Despite their own difficulties with internet access, we also had participants from Africa and South America. Broadly, 25% of the applicants are MSc students while 50% are pursuing their PhD (66% of early career researchers). Research areas of participants include public health, sociology, biomedicine, political sciences, architecture, law… In addition, following the experimental spirit of any research project, it has also been the intention of the school to provide the broadest perspective ...

This presentation describes the work done in the frame of the CoAct (Co-designing Citizen Social Science for Collective Action) project from January 2020 until June 2021. The presentation was done by CoAct Partners during Project Review number one, in an online meeting attended by the Project Officer and the Project Reviewer (June, 15th 2021). DISCLAIMER: The information and views set out in this presentation are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein.

DISCLAIMER: The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. CoAct proposes a new approach to face social global concerns with Research and Innovation Actions (R&I Actions) related to mental health care, youth employment, environmental justice and gender equality by engaging citizens as co-researchers. Our approach represents a new understanding of Citizen Social Science (CSS), understood here as participatory research co-designed and directly driven by citizen groups sharing a social concern. The overall objective of CoAct is to develop and demonstrate the scientific relevance and social impact of CSS, which is to date an underexplored area of Citizen Science (CS). This document constitutes Deliverable 2.1 'Report on State of the Art of Citizen Social Science' of Work Package 2 (WP2), which is dedicated to the CSS foundations. It provides a starting point towards a common framework and a common arena to better elaborate the various characteristics of CSS. CoAct wants to contribute to the debate by catalysing the discussion and enlarging the CSS community. This effort is unprecedented in the CS and the Social Science worlds and it is expected to later result into new open materials (for citizens, policy makers, NGOs and academics) and new transdisciplinary methodologies to widen the impact of CS. This report discusses CSS as a component of CS, with its main characteristics that citizens act as co-researchers conducting research on social issues with the aim of achieving transformative and sustainable impact with the research. CSS is however emerging from at three streams: from the broader spectrum of a CS community; from a participatory research background in the social sciences and humanities and moreover directly from Citizen ...

DISCLAIMER: The present Project Deliverable has been submitted to the European Commission for review. The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. CoAct proposes a new approach to face social global concerns with Research and Innovation Actions (R&I Actions) related to mental health care, youth employment, environmental justice and gender equality by engaging citizens as co-researchers. Our approach represents a new understanding of Citizen Social Science (CSS), understood here as participatory research co-designed and directly driven by citizen groups sharing a social concern. The overall objective of CoAct is to develop and demonstrate the scientific relevance and social impact of CSS, which is to date an underexplored area of Citizen Science (CS). This document constitutes Deliverable 2.1 'Report on State of the Art of Citizen Social Science' of Work Package 2 (WP2), which is dedicated to the CSS foundations. It provides a starting point towards a common framework and a common arena to better elaborate the various characteristics of CSS. CoAct wants to contribute to the debate by catalysing the discussion and enlarging the CSS community. This effort is unprecedented in the CS and the Social Science worlds and it is expected to later result into new open materials (for citizens, policy makers, NGOs and academics) and new transdisciplinary methodologies to widen the impact of CS. This report discusses CSS as a component of CS, with its main characteristics that citizens act as co-researchers conducting research on social issues with the aim of achieving transformative and sustainable impact with the research. CSS is however emerging from at three streams: from the broader spectrum of a CS community; from a participatory ...

This presentation describes the work done in the frame of the CoAct (Co-designing Citizen Social Science for Collective Action) project from January 2020 until June 2021. The presentation was done by CoAct Partners during Project Review number one, in an online meeting attended by the Project Officer and the Project Reviewer (June, 15th 2021). DISCLAIMER: The information and views set out in this presentation are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein.