Suchergebnisse
Filter
11 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Material Change Standards in Securities Law
In: (2024) 69:1 Canadian Business Law Journal 1-32
SSRN
Incentives, Experts, and Regulatory Renewal
In: (2021) 47:1 Queen's Law Journal 38–77
SSRN
Corporate Veil-Piercing and Structures of Canadian Business Law
In: (2022) 55:1 UBC Law Review 203–50
SSRN
Proxy Advisors as Issue Spotters
In: (2021) 15:2 Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law 371–419
SSRN
Two Paths to Senate Reform
In: Revue québécoise de droit constitutionnel, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 125-44
SSRN
Breaking the Bargain: A Comment on the Constitutional Validity of Bill C-7, the Proposed Senate Reform Act
In: University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review, Band 70, Heft 2
SSRN
Rational Choices, But for Whom? Transnational Financial Regulation after the Crisis
In: Transnational Legal Theory, Band 2, Heft 3, S. 455-462
SSRN
Reasonable Expectations and Fiduciary Obligations
In: Re-Imagining Capitalism, S. 226-245
Protecting Reasonable Expectations: Mapping the Trajectory of the Law
The doctrine of reasonable expectations has evolved into a powerful tool for judicial and regulatory activism and, as a result, a bellwether for the trajectory of the law. The concept has broadened — both in scope and in the range of potential claimants. Yet it has been used to achieve goals that are remarkably consistent across different areas of law: first, to require powerful actors to treat stakeholders fairly, which entails treating them with honesty and avoiding actions that would impose unnecessary or disproportionate costs on them; second, to uphold the integrity of legal or regulatory regimes by remedying actions that frustrate their purpose by allowing an actor to avoid the obligations associated with these regimes. The doctrine is particularly relevant to contemporary society, where legislative processes have become constrained by, among other things, the short-term incentives that inform and motivate political processes. As the tension between public expectations and legislative responsiveness becomes more severe, a growing role has emerged for our courts and independent regulatory bodies to use reasonable expectations to forge new legal pathways. This article outlines what appears to be an accelerating trend — first by reflecting on the nature of "reasonable expectations" and then exploring how the doctrine has been and is likely to be applied.
BASE
Pension Fiduciaries and Public Responsibilities: Emerging Themes in the Law
In: Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, Band 6, Heft 2
SSRN
Working paper