When the Panic Broke Out: Covid-19 and Investment Funds' Portfolio Rebalancing Around the World
In: Bank of Italy Temi di Discussione (Working Paper) No. 1342
14 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Bank of Italy Temi di Discussione (Working Paper) No. 1342
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
In: Bank of Italy Temi di Discussione (Working Paper) No. 1426
SSRN
In: European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance Working Paper No. 782/2021
SSRN
In: Bank of Italy Temi di Discussione (Working Paper) No. 1371
SSRN
In: Bank of Italy Occasional Paper No. 788
SSRN
In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP16477
SSRN
In: NBER Working Paper No. w23541
SSRN
Working paper
In: Bank of Italy Occasional Paper No. 441
SSRN
Working paper
In: Bank of Italy Occasional Paper No. 194
SSRN
Working paper
In: ESRB: Working Paper Series 2021/122
SSRN
In: Bank of Italy Occasional Paper No. 626
SSRN
The crisis management framework for banks in the European Union (EU) requires the resolution authorities to identify the existence of a public interest to resolve an ailing bank, rather than to open normal insolvency proceedings (NIPs). The Public Interest Assessment (PIA) determines whether resolution objectives, including the safeguard of financial stability, can be better preserved using resolution tools than NIPs .This paper provides a contribution to the ongoing discussion on the implementation of the PIA, by presenting an analytical framework to quantify the potential impact on the real economy stemming from a bank's failure under NIPs through the interruption of the lending activity ("credit channel"). The framework is harmonized across the jurisdictions belonging to the Banking Union and aims to improve the quantitative leg of the PIA, to be coupled with qualitative elements. In a first step, we quantify the potential credit shortfall faced by firms and households due to the abrupt closure of a bank. In a second step, the impact of the credit shortfall on real outcomes is estimated via a FAVAR model and via a micro-econometric model. Reference values are provided to assess the relevance of the estimated outcomes. The illustrative results show that such a harmonized approach can be applied across the Banking Union and to banks of heterogeneous size. In case of mid-sized banks, this common analytical framework could reduce the uncertainty regarding the extent to which the failure of the institution could have a negative impact to the real economy if the lending activity is interrupted as possibly the case under NIPs.
BASE