Suchergebnisse

Comparative studies of mobile crisis home treatment, 1958-2001 -- Studies of home visiting and early intervention, 1992-1993 -- Mobile crisis home treatment in a US managed care organization -- Mobile crisis teams in US -- Summary and discussion -- Mobile crisis home treatment and psychiatric beds -- Disadvantages of hospital treatment -- How is mobile crisis home treatment an alternative to hospital admission? -- How does mobile crisis home treatment compare to other alternatives to hospital? -- Mobile crisis home treatment, early intervention and modified outpatient services -- Mobile crisis home treatment and psychiatric emergency services -- Mobile crisis home treatment and crisis intervention -- Mobile crisis home treatment and outreach -- Mobile crisis home treatment services in three countries: seven site visits : USA, Canada, Britain -- Key elements and principles of mobile crisis home treatment -- Key elements and principles of mobile crisis home treatment -- How to set up and operate a mobile crisis home treatment service -- Starting up a mobile crisis home treatment service -- Should the mobile crisis home treatment team be a separate team, or integrated with a standard mental health team? -- Operating a mobile crisis home treatment service -- Daily program operations -- The process of mobile crisis home treatment from start to finish -- Mobile crisis home treatment of specific mental disorders. part I -- A mobile crisis home treatment service for schizophrenia -- Mobile crisis home treatment of specific mental disorders. part II.

AbstractMany disputes related to environmental issues are resolved through often antagonistic negotiations in a regulatory context or through litigation. These approaches are certainly the best choices for resolving certain disputes. However, just as no single remediation technology is the right fit for every site, so no single dispute resolution process is the best choice for every situation. Cost‐effective dispute resolution can have an impact on overall project costs. There is a range of dispute resolution alternatives (from collaborative decision making through mediation, arbitration, and litigation), each with its own benefits. The characteristics of disputes and relationships are key to selecting the "best" dispute resolution process for each situation. As the public becomes ever‐more cognizant of the Department of Defense's (DOD) environmental policies and actions, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options have the potential to yield better relationships and more positive perceptions.

The paper is based upon research over a rather long period into the public activities in railroad construction in the southern states. Table I-A presents a quantitative summary of public contributions in cash, bonds, and other securities; government-endorsed bonds; remission of Federal import duties; and estimated realized values of Federal land grants prior to 1861. It represents an attempt to give a preliminary summary of the public effort. The estimates on public land grants are tentative, and other items are subject to further refinements through additional studies. It does not represent the total of the public effort, since no account is taken in this summary of the investment values of the many important public and quasi-public contributions in services, the uses of public streets and other properties, tax exemptions, and banking privileges. An adequate appraisal of these must await further research. The summary does reflect, however, some of the outstanding features of the public railroad-building effort, which will supply a useful background for the consideration of the main problem of this paper.

It is necessary to indicate at the outset the general character of the historical material with which this paper deals. I have been able to discover in this period of Georgia's history almost no advocacy or discussion of the doctrine of laissez faire as such. On the other hand, one finds much discussion of private and public enterprise which, if removed from the context of events, would seem to involve most of the commonly accepted tenets of laissez faire. Lastly, there are the main currents of social action, which, upon investigation, are found to have comprised a varying mixture of private and public activities. It is difficult, if not impossible, to determine the logic of the social policy which directed these currents simply by observing the varying proportions of private and public action; it would be necessary first to go behind the action and study both the ends and the means. In the limited space allotted to this paper, it is possible to present only the barest outlines of the more important events and discussions in which the issue of public interference or of private versus public action arose. Interpretations and evaluations must be left, for the most part, to additional studies

Cover -- Half Title -- Title -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- List of Tables -- List of Figures -- Notes on Contributors -- Acknowledgements -- 1 Doing Social Science -- 2 Technology: Taylor's Play Between Worlds -- 3 Crime: Edgar et al.'s Prison Violence -- 4 Time: Gershuny's Changing Times -- 5 Place: Savage et al.'s Globalization and Belonging -- 6 Subculture: Hodkinson's Goth -- 7 TV Soaps: Tufte's Living with the Rubbish Queen -- 8 Post-Colonial History: Butalia's The Other Sideof Silence -- 9 News Interviews: Clayman and Heritage'sThe News Interview -- 10 Family: Bengtson et al.'s How Families Still Matter -- Index.

Cover -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- 1 The Destandardisation of Household Formation -- 2 Domesticity, Household Formation and Youth Research -- 3 Risk, Individualisation and the Single Life -- 4 Living in and Leaving the Parental Home -- 5 Student Housing and Households -- 6 Shared Housing, Grown-up Style -- 7 Solo Living: Who Wants to Live Alone? -- 8 Friends and Family -- 9 Negotiating Current and Future Partnerships -- 10 Redefining Home? -- 11 Conclusion: Twenty-somethings and Household Change -- Appendix 1 The Young Adults and Shared Household Living Project -- Appendix 2 Household Profiles -- Bibliography -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- R -- S -- U -- Y.

Intro -- Contents -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Acknowledgements -- Notes on Contributors -- 1. Introduction -- I The Political Economy of Time -- 2. Time, Complexity and the Global -- Introduction -- Times -- The global paradigm -- Global hybrids -- Conclusion -- Acknowledgements -- 3. Service Regimes and the Political Economy of Time -- Introduction -- Historical change in time use -- The political economy at time -- High and low value services, production and consumption -- Alternative service economies -- Conclusion -- 4. Politicizing Time: Temporal Issues for Second-Wave Feminists -- Introduction: if only we had time -- Women have no time -- Making time to act -- Challenging time -- Time enough -- Notes -- 5. Time and Speed in the Social Universe of Capital -- Introduction -- The speed of life -- The social universe of capital: M-C-M& -- #8242 -- meets E = mc[sup(2)] -- A theory of social time -- II Work Time -- 6. How Many Hours? Work-Time Regimes and Preferences in European Countries -- Introduction -- Working-time trends and pressures in contemporary societies -- Who works the longest hours? -- How many hours would men and women prefer to work? -- Conclusion -- Notes -- 7. Gendered and Classed Working Time in Britain: Dual-Employee Couples in Higher/Lower-Level Occupations -- Introduction -- Data -- Gendered and classed working time -- Dual breadwinners -- Male breadwinners -- Dual breadwinners -- Female breadwinners -- Dual carers -- Conclusion -- 8. Employment Patterns for the Future: Balancing Work and Family Life in Two Local Authorities -- Introduction -- The case study organizations and the survey -- Polarization in coping with care responsibilities -- Diverging preferences -- Conclusion -- Acknowledgements -- 9. Making Time for Management: the Careers and Lives of Manager-Academics in UK Universities -- Introduction.