Anticap: An Appreciation
In: Rethinking marxism: RM ; a journal of economics, culture, and society ; official journal of the Association for Economic and Social Analysis, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 366-369
ISSN: 1475-8059
34 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Rethinking marxism: RM ; a journal of economics, culture, and society ; official journal of the Association for Economic and Social Analysis, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 366-369
ISSN: 1475-8059
In: Rethinking marxism: RM ; a journal of economics, culture, and society ; official journal of the Association for Economic and Social Analysis, Band 26, Heft 3, S. 336-359
ISSN: 1475-8059
In: Rethinking marxism: RM ; a journal of economics, culture, and society, Band 26, Heft 3, S. 336-359
ISSN: 0893-5696
In: Rethinking marxism: RM ; a journal of economics, culture, and society ; official journal of the Association for Economic and Social Analysis, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 180-185
ISSN: 1475-8059
In: Rethinking marxism: RM ; a journal of economics, culture, and society ; official journal of the Association for Economic and Social Analysis, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 341-351
ISSN: 1475-8059
In: Rethinking marxism: RM ; a journal of economics, culture, and society, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 341-352
ISSN: 0893-5696
In: Rethinking marxism: RM ; a journal of economics, culture, and society, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 180-186
ISSN: 0893-5696
Reconsider Karl Marx's labor theory of value in light of the work of Louis Althusser. It is suggested that two particular Althusserian insights in this regard are key: any Marxian value theory must give primacy to the concept of Marxism's object, ie, to a definition of class as a redistribution of unpayments; & to locate this object properly, one must understand causality through relations rather than through elements. This argument is pursued in the context of a discussion of five Marxian theses of value as interpreted by Althusser: (1) aggregate equalities have the status of accounting identities; (2) value is determined in its forms; (3) surplus value is defined as unpaid labor performed during the production process; (4) by definition, surplus value is residual labor performed outside what is paid to labor power; & (5) surplus value is also determined by its forms. A sixth thesis for practitioners of Marxian value theory is also proposed. Marxian theory of value is capable of overcoming any problem if basic questions of redistribution & exploitation are posed in a useful manner. 2 References. D. M. Smith
In: The journal of economic history, Band 50, Heft 3, S. 777-779
ISSN: 1471-6372
In: Rethinking marxism: RM ; a journal of economics, culture, and society ; official journal of the Association for Economic and Social Analysis, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 134-142
ISSN: 1475-8059
In: Rethinking marxism: RM ; a journal of economics, culture, and society ; official journal of the Association for Economic and Social Analysis, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 136-151
ISSN: 1475-8059
In: Capital & class, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 84-103
ISSN: 2041-0980
The main camps in the 'value' debate are sketched and it is argued that it is wrong to reduce all 'surplus theory' to the Sraffian approach. There are a plurality of surplus approaches and the Marxian one is uniquely equipped to answer the fundamental Marxian questions. The great virtue of the Marxian approach resides in its double structure of prices and value which places economic activity in the context of a broader redistributive class process. Nevertheless, it is recognised that the Steedman-type points in cases of joint production still have a critical force. Consequently, it is demonstrated how they might be overcome with a different method for tackling the transformation
In: Bremer Beiträge zur Geographie und Raumplanung 12
In: Arbeiten zur Chinaforschung
In: Bremer Beiträge zur Geographie und Raumplanung 12
In: The prison journal: the official publication of the Pennsylvania Prison Society, Band 34, Heft 1, S. 49-51
ISSN: 1552-7522
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 99, Heft 1, S. 218-219
ISSN: 1548-1433
Eldoret: An African Poetics of Technology. Richard M. Swiderski. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1995. 228 pp.