Local Social Norms and Military Sexual Stressors: Do Senior Officers' Norms Matter?
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relative importance of harassment-tolerant norms emanating from troops' senior officers, immediate supervisors, and units on troops' sexual stressor experiences and to see if associations differed by sex. METHOD: Cross-sectional survey of all 681 willing and confirmed active duty troops enrolled in the VA National Enrollment Database between 1998 and 2002. Findings extended an earlier analysis. RESULTS: After adjusting for other significant correlates, senior officers' perceived tolerance of sexual harassment was not associated with the severity of sexual harassment troops reported (p = 0.64) or with the numbers of sexual identity challenges they reported (p = 0.11). Harassment-tolerant norms emanating from troops' units and immediate supervisors were associated with reporting severer sexual harassment and more sexual identity challenges (all p's < 0.003). Findings generalized across sex. CONCLUSIONS: Senior officers' norms did not appear to affect troops' reports of military sexual stressors, but unit norms and immediate supervisors' norms did.