State cigarette taxes, smoking cessation, and implications for the educational gradient in mortality
In: Social science & medicine, Band 362, S. 117398
ISSN: 1873-5347
5 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Social science & medicine, Band 362, S. 117398
ISSN: 1873-5347
In: Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities: an official journal of the Cobb-NMA Health Institute, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 357-365
ISSN: 2196-8837
In: Housing policy debate, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 129-163
ISSN: 2152-050X
BACKGROUND: The current U.S. context is marked by extreme right-left partisanship, which means that state policies tend to bundle together and are not experienced in isolation. While prior work has leveraged abrupt shifts in single policies to examine the effects of state policy on birth outcomes, we examined a holistic measure that captures political polarization. METHODS: Data were drawn from national birth certificates for 2003–2017 (N = 56,770,470). Outcomes included preterm birth, low birthweight, small-for-gestational-age, and other perinatal health measures. The primary exposure was a composite index of right-left state policy orientation, generated from historical data on 135 state policies. Multivariable regressions were used to estimate the association between state policy orientation and each outcome, adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Compared to infants born in states with right-leaning policy orientations, those born in left-leaning states had lower odds of adverse birth outcomes (e.g., low birthweight: OR 0.95 (0.93, 0.97), preterm birth: OR 0.94 (0.92, 0.95)). Subgroup analyses revealed stronger associations for U.S.-born and White mothers. With the inclusion of state fixed effects, left-leaning policy orientation was no longer associated with lower odds of adverse birth outcomes. Models were otherwise robust to alternative specifications. CONCLUSION: While left-leaning state policy orientation has protective associations with a range of birth outcomes, the associations may be explained by stable characteristics of states, at least during the study period. Future studies should examine state policy orientation in association with other health outcomes and study periods.
BASE
In: PNAS nexus, Band 1, Heft 3
ISSN: 2752-6542
Abstract
Excess mortality has exceeded reported deaths from Covid-19 during the pandemic. This gap may be attributable to deaths that occurred among individuals with undiagnosed Covid-19 infections or indirect consequences of the pandemic response such as interruptions in medical care; distinguishing these possibilities has implications for public health responses. In the present study, we examined patterns of excess mortality over time and by setting (in-hospital or out-of-hospital) and cause of death using death certificate data from California. The estimated number of excess natural-cause deaths from 2020 March 1 to 2021 February 28 (69,182) exceeded the number of Covid-19 diagnosed deaths (53,667) by 29%. Nearly half, 47.4% (32,775), of excess natural-cause deaths occurred out of the hospital, where only 28.6% (9,366) of excess mortality was attributed to Covid-19. Over time, increases or decreases in excess natural non-Covid-19 mortality closely mirrored increases or decreases in Covid-19 mortality. The time series were positively correlated in out-of-hospital settings, particularly at time lags when excess natural-cause deaths preceded reported Covid-19 deaths; for example, when comparing Covid-19 deaths to excess natural-cause deaths in the week prior, the correlation was 0.73. The strong temporal association of reported Covid-19 deaths with excess out-of-hospital deaths from other reported natural-cause causes suggests Covid-19 deaths were undercounted during the first year of the pandemic.