Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Critical studies in education and culture series
In: Cultural studies - critical methodologies, Band 20, Heft 5, S. 402-413
ISSN: 1552-356X
This paper juxtaposes the ethnographic work of Alice Goffman, as presented in her book, On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City, with my own work involved in developing the article, "Whales Tales, Dog Piles, and Beer Goggles: An Ethnographic Case Study of Fraternity Life." In particular, I examine anonymization issues arising from both works. The intent is to advance a deeper discussion of ethnographic anonymization toward responding to critics and strengthening the ethnographic endeavor in the field of educational research.
This paper examines the development of the U.S. research university, highlighting both its great success as well as some fundamental problems. Arguing that the U.S. research university is often looked to globally as a model for other nations, the author offers some cautionary concerns. More specifically, the author identifies four critical stages in the development of the U.S. research university: the Germanic influence of the 1800s, the rise of government sponsorship of research during World Wars I and II, the emergence of the multiversity, and the rise of the entrepreneurial university under neoliberalism. The author argues that critical flaws related to each of these stages are evident in the contemporary rendition of the U.S. research university and that such flaws must be considered in either drawing from the U.S. model or in seeking to recast it.
BASE
This paper examines the ways in which the Bush administration and its allies have targeted the American university as part of a broad assault on democracy. The author maintains that the administration has used the tragic events of September 11 to strike fear in the American people for the purposes of formulating a more aggressive militarization both home and abroad. This "New Militarism" justifies two particular positions with regard to the relationship between the Bush administration and the nation's universities. First, and because of the potential for criticism to arise from within the walls of the university, the Bush administration and its allies have sought to limit such critiques through a variety of actions and policies. Second, the Bush administration and its supporters have been intent on strengthening the already strong ties between the American university and the U.S. military industrial complex, including the Department of Defense. These two broad assaults have resulted in further deterioration to the American university's democratic potential and its ability to advance a more just world.
BASE
In: Studies in symbolic interaction, Band 26, S. 235-259
ISSN: 0163-2396
With the increasing integration of global economies and societies, the nation-state is no longer the sole force shaping and defining citizenship. New ideas of "global citizenship" are emerging, and universities, which are increasingly involved in international engagements, provide a unique opportunity to explore how fundamental understandings of modern citizenship are changing. Drawing on case studies of universities in China, the United States, Hungary, and Argentina, Global Citizenship and the University moves beyond a narrow political definition of citizenship to address the cultural and ec
In: Education and society, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 5-26
ISSN: 0726-2655
In: Education and society, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 5-23
ISSN: 0726-2655
In: Education and society, Band 32, Heft 1, S. 5-28
ISSN: 0726-2655
In: Second International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research, S. 203-217
In: Education and society, Band 27, Heft 1, S. 5-33
ISSN: 0726-2655