Suchergebnisse

Intro -- Why Muslims Lagged Behind and Others Progressed -- About the Author -- Dedication -- Copyright Information © -- Acknowledgement -- Preface -- Introduction -- Chapter One -- Prince Shakib Arslan Responds -- Uniformity of Weakness in Islamic Peoples -- Reasons for the Rise of Muslims of the Past -- Factors That Allowed Earlier Muslims to Progress Are No More -- A Comparison of the Conditions of Muslims and Europeans Today -- The Muslim Excuse and Its Rejection -- The Results of Egypt's Support for the Fighters of Tripoli and Cyrenaica -- Betrayal by Some Muslims of Their Faith and Nation and Their Lame Excuse -- King Ibn Saud on the Treachery and Betrayal of Muslims -- Striving to Spread the Faith: A Comparison between Muslims and Christians -- Chapter Two -- Main Reasons for the Backwardness of Muslims -- Ignorance and Deficient Knowledge -- Moral Corruption Especially Among Leaders and Religious Scholars -- Cowardice and Fear -- Despair and Hopelessness -- Befuddlement of the Ignorant and Cowardly and the Reply -- The Loss of Islam between Conservatives and Progressives -- Europeans Preserve Their Nationalism -- Progress of the Japanese an Example for Arabs and All Muslims -- Why Do We Not Call Japan and Europe Regressive Despite Their Religiosity? -- Misfortunes Inflicted by the Conservatives on Islam and Muslims -- Verses of Work Refuting the Interpretation of Fate as Predestination and Laziness -- Conservative Muslims Are Enticement for the Enemies of Islam and Evidence against It -- Chapter Three -- Islamic Civilisation -- A Reply to the Contemptuous Enviers of Islamic Civilisation -- Greece and Rome Before and After Christianity -- Backwardness of Europe in the Past and Its Rise in the Present -- Chapter Four -- Exhortation of the Quran to Knowledge -- A Word to Those Who Demand a National Rather Than a Religious Revival.

Background: A strong and self confident primary care workforce can deliver the highest quality care and outcomes equitably and cost effectively. To meet the increasing demands being made of it, primary care needs its own thriving research culture and knowledge base. Methods: Review of recent developments supporting primary care clinical research. Results: Primary care research has benefited from a small group of passionate leaders and significant investment in recent decades in some countries. Emerging from this has been innovation in research design and focus, although less is known of the effect on research output. Conclusion: Primary care research is now well placed to lead a broad re-vitalisation of academic medicine, answering questions of relevance to practitioners, patients, communities and Government. Key areas for future primary care research leaders to focus on include exposing undergraduates early to primary care research, integrating this early exposure with doctoral and postdoctoral research career support, further expanding cross disciplinary approaches, and developing useful measures of output for future primary care research investment.