Suchergebnisse

Information systems management is part of the implementation of educational management that must be prioritized for the advancement and development of education, so that output is in accordance with the goals made. The fact based on data from many institutions, both the government or PNF organizers, especially course and training organizers in the city of Semarang does not yet have the awareness to properly manage information systems. The aim of this study is to analyze and describe the effectiveness of the Supply Chain Management information syntem model in non-formal education businesses. This research design uses real experimental research methods (true experimental design) with pretest-posttest control group design design. This research population is participants and organizers of Course and Training Institute, Job Training Institute, Community Learning Activity Center, Course Institute, and Tutoring in Semarang city. The sampling technique used is simple random sampling numbering 260. Data collection using test instruments in the form of tiered scale coesioners. Analysis of this study data using the average difference test of two paired sample groups (Paired Sample T-Test). Based on the results of research it is known that the implementation of supply chain management information system in noformal education business is effective as significant as a nonformal educational information system. Thus, supply chain management-based educational information systems that are often applied to business education at the higher education level are also relevant to be applied to nonformal education businesses.

The goal of education is to foster all students' intellectual, social, and personal potential to their highest level by providing them with an equitable and equal education irrespective of their characteristics (e.g., ethnicity, social class, language use, religion, and other human differences). Different students and communities should not be excluded in terms of curriculum. At the micro-level classroom, student engagement is central. Teachers should go beyond the prescribed curriculum by working with their students and by including their voices. However, how can students be successful academically and socially if the school curriculum is anchored in the mainstream curriculum, primarily promoting the dominant groups? For example, given that the books, curriculum, and standardised testing are centralised in Indonesia, the content is, of course, generalised for all students. Teachers and schools throughout the country should use the same materials for all students. However, for the disadvantaged children coming from poor, rural, and remote areas, such policies lead them to trouble. They learn the books and materials that are similar to those that the affluent schools and students use in cities, but their values and perspectives are excluded. Also, how can students who are racially, culturally, and linguistically marginalised and low-income families succeed if the curriculum is organised exclusively to maintain the current social structure? The purpose of this paper is to explore the need to move from an exclusive to inclusive curriculum in Indonesia so that all students can succeed academically and socially. The orienting questions for this study are: (1) What do we mean by an exclusive and inclusive curriculum? (2) What are the components of an inclusive curriculum? (3) What should be reformed to create an inclusive curriculum? (4) What kind of leadership is required to guide the reform from an exclusive to an inclusive curriculum? (DIPF/Orig.)