Suchergebnisse

El artículo propone una aproximación epistemológica pluralista a la investigación de las relaciones entre comunicación y cambio social. A tal fin, se parte de la propuesta de fusión epistemológica realizada por Johan Galtung para los Estudios para la Paz, tomando en cuenta, además, las particularidades del fenómeno de la comunicación. Según Galtung, la combinación del cartesianismo, del verum-factum (Vico) y del taoísmo permitiría contrarrestar los riesgos del monismo epistemológico y superar sus limitaciones. En este mismo sentido, el artículo plantea ampliar cada una de estas epistemologías en un nivel más general y abarcador (ciencia, humanidades, ecologismo holista-dialéctico), y describir su recorrido histórico para identificar las posibilidades de complementariedad y su valor para el estudio de la comunicación y el cambio.

This two-part article explores Herman and Chomsky's propaganda model from diverse angles, with the aim of deepening its current dynamism and validity for explaining mass media production and content in advanced capitalist democracies. Part I of the contribution studies the contemporary relevance of the five components or "filters" that comprise the model, relates them to ongoing sociohistorical developments, and focuses on the different interactions affecting the media in the context of power relations. It then analyzes the situations in which the spectrum of media opinion is more open. Part II focuses on the validity of the model for explaining news content both in countries other than the United States and on the Internet, as well as for explaining media products other than news. This is followed by an examination of the possibility of expanding and modifying the model by incorporating other factors, which may be considered secondary filters.

"Thirty years after Chomsky and Herman elaborated the Propaganda Model this title aims to introduce a new generation of readers to it. It presents cutting-edge research demonstrating the model's general validity as well as new attempts – in the light of digital media and 21st century politics – to critically update, expand, and refine it.
International researchers thus analyse the continuities and new developments in media
Environments throughout various regions of the world. Part I addresses the theoretical and methodological dimensions of the PM beginning with an interview with Edward Herman on the model itself. Part II reflects on propaganda as a concept and practice within new mediated digital communications systems and interfaces. Applications of the Propaganda Model are featured in Part III notably new forms of media and content not previously analysed within it: the entertainment industries through the analysis of television, professional sports, Hollywood movies and videogames using quantitative and qualitative research methods. The last section presents case studies of corporate media and reporting practices as reflections of elite power. An extensive re-visioning of the PM this book concludes by identifying the fundamental dimensions of the model, the key modifications and expansions that are suggested—such as the inclusion of new filters—whilst assessing the model's overall value for conducting research in different geographical contexts and media systems and products."

"Thirty years after Chomsky and Herman elaborated the Propaganda Model this title aims to introduce a new generation of readers to it. It presents cutting-edge research demonstrating the model's general validity as well as new attempts – in the light of digital media and 21st century politics – to critically update, expand, and refine it. International researchers thus analyse the continuities and new developments in media Environments throughout various regions of the world. Part I addresses the theoretical and methodological dimensions of the PM beginning with an interview with Edward Herman on the model itself. Part II reflects on propaganda as a concept and practice within new mediated digital communications systems and interfaces. Applications of the Propaganda Model are featured in Part III notably new forms of media and content not previously analysed within it: the entertainment industries through the analysis of television, professional sports, Hollywood movies and videogames using quantitative and qualitative research methods. The last section presents case studies of corporate media and reporting practices as reflections of elite power. An extensive re-visioning of the PM this book concludes by identifying the fundamental dimensions of the model, the key modifications and expansions that are suggested—such as the inclusion of new filters—whilst assessing the model's overall value for conducting research in different geographical contexts and media systems and products."

By way of prologue Alberto Acosta Translated by Sheila Agenjo AlcaideAcknowledgementsIntroductionJoan Pedro-Carañana, Eliana Herrera-Huérfano and Juana Ochoa AlmanzaChapter 1. Dialogue of knowledges in the Pluriverse Eliana Herrera-Huérfano, Joan Pedro-Carañana and Juana Ochoa Almanza Chapter 2. Weaving life: The women of the Andes in their decolonial workElvira Espejo Ayca and Aura Isabel MoraChapter 3. Promoting Nonviolent Communication for a Harmonious Communication Ecosystem Vedabhyas KunduChapter 4. Voices with Purpose: Lessons Learned from the South-South Collaboration between Latin America and Africa for the Strengthening of Communication Capacities in Social Organizations Jair Vega-Casanova, Rafael Obregón Gálvez, Sara-Nathalie and Gabriel Baglo Chapter 5. Conserving the Mangroves? Social and Environmental Conflicts in the Gulf of Guayaquil: The Case of Puerto El Morro, Posorja and Isla PunáKaren Andrade Mendoza and Galo Plaza VanegasTranslated by: Catalina Campuzano RodríguezChapter 6. Reverse Media Policy: Challenging Empires, Resisting Power.Des FreedmanChapter 7.Popular Music, Gender and Communicative Justice on International Women's DayJosep Pedro and Begoña Gutiérrez-Martínez Chapter 8. Exploring Resistance to Development in the Okinawa PluriverseDaniel Broudy and Ariko Ikehara Chapter 9.Ontologies and Ecologies of the Otherwise: Notes on Post-development Practices in MalawiCarlos A. SegoviaChapter 10. Further roads for communicative justice in pluriversal dialoguesEliana Herrera-Huérfano, Joan Pedro-Carañana and Juana Ochoa Almanza.Postscript: Justice, Sustainability, and Communications: A Pluriversal Approach Ashish Kotari

"This volume examines communicative justice from the perspective of the pluriverse and explores how it is employed to work towards key pluriverse goals of environmental, cognitive, socio-cultural, socio-political, and political economy justice. The book identifies and explains the unequal power relations in place that limit the possibilities of communication justice, the challenges and difficulties faced by activists and communities, the ways in which communities and movements have confronted power structures through discourse and material action, and their successes and limitations in creating new structures that promote the right to, and facilitate a future for, communicative justice. The volume features contributions based on experiences of resistance and transformation in the Global South - Bolivia, Ecuador, India, Malawi, and collaborations between the continents of Latin America and Africa - as well as notable studies from the Global North - Japan, Spain, and the United Kingdom - that defy hegemonic models. This book is essential for students and scholars interested in media and communication activism, media practice for development and social change, and communication for development and social change, as well as those actively engaged with activism and social justice"--

Contents: Brian Michael Goss/Joan Pedro-Carañana/Mary Rachel Gould: Washed Up on the Shores of Neoliberal Globalization – Joan Pedro-Carañana/Natalie Fenton: A Conversation With Natalie Fenton: «Resocializing the Political and Re-politicizing the Economy» – Rae Lynn Schwartz-DuPre/Radha S. Hegde: A Conversation With Radha S. Hegde: Globalization: «It's Everywhere; It's Nowhere» – Brian Michael Goss: «Petting the Burning Dog» of Orientalism: Implications of Occupation (2009) and Generation Kill (2008) for Cosmopolitan Assumptions About Globalization – Christopher Chávez/Mary Rachel Gould: Courting the LGBTQ Consumer: A Global Perspective – Josep Pedro-Carañana: The Globalization of Blues: Rural, Urban, Transatlantic. – Michael Arnold: «Ai, é tão bom ser pequenino!»: OqueStrada's Fado-Chanson-Ska and Local Sustainable Capitalism – Joan Pedro-Carañana: The Globalization of Universities: European Higher Education Area Viewed From the Perspectives of the Enlightenment and Industrialism – Marion Wrenn: Strategic Sociability: US-led Journalist Reorientation Programs and Cold War Media Practices – Staša Tkalec: Defending Human Rights in the Twenty-First Century: Where Have All the Intellectuals Gone? – Delia Dumitrica: Facebook's Global Imaginary: The Symbolic Production of the World Through Social Media – Cameron McCarthy: The Global City and the Uses of the New Multiculture.

El artículo se ocupa de cómo los temas más relevantes para la opinión pública colombiana se hicieron presentes en las discusiones y debates acaecidos en Twitter durante la campaña presidencial 2018. En un primer nivel, se analizó el grado de correspondencia entre los temas prioritarios para los ciudadanos según las principales encuestas y la presencia y tratamiento axiológico de estos temas en Twitter a partir de datos obtenidos mediante análisis de contenido. En un segundo nivel, se conjugaron datos cuantitativos y cualitativos que permitieron identificar la estructura de la racionalidad de la acción política que cada ideología promueve. Como resultado, no existió correspondencia alta entre los temas de los demoscópicos y las expresadas en Twitter. Además, las relaciones de poder por la hegemonía evidenciaron una predominancia de emisores de centro enfocados mayoritariamente en educación, mientras que la derecha y la izquierda con menos emisores lograron hegemonizar dos temas cada uno.

The article focuses on how the most relevant issues for Colombian public opinion were present in the debates that took place on Twitter during the 2018 presidential campaign. In the first level, the degree of correspondence between priority issues for citizens as expressed in the main surveys and the presence and axiological treatment of these topics on Twitter based on a method of content analysis was analyzed. At a second level, quantitative and qualitative data were combined to identify the structure of the rationality of political action that each ideology promotes. The results showed that there was no high correspondence between the topics of the demoscopic studies and those expressed on Twitter. In addition, the power relations for hegemony showed a predominance of centrist senders focused mainly on education, while the right and the left had fewer senders but managed to hegemonize two topics each. ; El artículo se ocupa de cómo los temas más relevantes para la opinión pública colombiana se hicieron presentes en las discusiones y debates acaecidos en Twitter durante la campaña presidencial 2018. En un primer nivel, se analizó el grado de correspondencia entre los temas prioritarios para los ciudadanos según las principales encuestas y la presencia y tratamiento axiológico de estos temas en Twitter a partir de datos obtenidos mediante análisis de contenido. En un segundo nivel, se conjugaron datos cuantitativos y cualitativos que permitieron identificar la estructura de la racionalidad de la acción política que cada ideología promueve. Como resultado, no existió correspondencia alta entre los temas de los demoscópicos y las expresadas en Twitter. Además, las relaciones de poder por la hegemonía evidenciaron una predominancia de emisores de centro enfocados mayoritariamente en educación, mientras que la derecha y la izquierda con menos emisores lograron hegemonizar dos temas cada uno.

El artículo analiza los vínculos entre el cambio social y la comunicación pública en el pensamiento de John Arbuthnot, Thomas Jefferson y Karl Marx, autores que se encuentran en el origen de las tres ideologías políticas características de la modernidad: conservadora, reformista y revolucionaria, respectivamente. Se pone de relieve su posición frente al cambio, su proyecto de sociedad y los actores sociales protagonistas, todo ello en relación con el papel que otorgan a la comunicación en dichos procesos. [ABSTRACT] This article analyses the links between social change and public communication in the thought of John Arbuthnot, Thomas Jefferson and Karl Marx, authors who are at the origin of the three political ideologies characteristic of modernity: conservative, reformist and revolutionary, respectively. It highlights their stance on change, their social project and the leading social actors they identify, all in relation to the role granted to communication in these processes.

"The first book dedicated specifically to research methods in the political economy of media and communication, it provides a methodological toolkit to investigate the functioning of media, technology, and cultural industries in their historical, institutional, structural, and systemic contexts. Featuring contributions from across the globe and a variety of methodological perspectives, this volume presents the state of the art in political economy of media and communication methods, articulating those methods with adjacent approaches, to study concentration of ownership and power, pluralism and diversity, regulation and public policies, governance, genderization, and sustainability. This collection charts the methodological innovations critical political economists are adopting to analyse a rapidly transforming digital media landscape, exploring ideology, narratives, socio-analysis and praxis in communication with ethnographic and participatory approaches, as well as designs for quantitative and qualitative methods of textual, discourse and content analysis, network analyses which consider power relations affecting communication, including intersectional oppressions and the new developments taking place in Artificial Intelligence. An essential text for advanced undergraduates, postgraduate students, and researchers in the areas of media, cultural and communication studies, particularly those studying topics such as the political economy of media and/or communication, media and communication theory, and research methods"--

International audience ; Since its initial formulation in 1988, the Herman-Chomsky Propaganda Model (PM) has become one of the most widely tested models of media performance in the social sciences. This is largely due to the combined efforts of a loose group of international scholars as well as an increasing number of students who have produced studies in the US, UK, Canadian, Australian, Japanese, Chinese, German, and Dutch contexts, amongst others. Yet, the PM has also been marginalised in media and communication scholarship, largely due to the fact that the PM"s radical scholarly outlook challenges the liberal and conservative underpinnings of mainstream schools of thought in capitalist democracies. This paper brings together, for the first time, leading scholars to discuss important questions pertaining to the PM"s origins, public relevance, connections to other approaches within Communication Studies and Cultural Studies, applicability in the social media age, as well as impact and influence. The paper aligns with the 30 th anniversary of the PM and the publication of the collected volume, The Propaganda Model Today, and highlights the PM"s continued relevance at a time of unprecedented corporate consolidation of the media, extreme levels of inequality and class conflict as well as emergence of new forms of authoritarianism.

Since its initial formulation in 1988, the Herman-Chomsky Propaganda Model (PM) has become one of the most widely tested models of media performance in the social sciences. This is largely due to the combined efforts of a loose group of international scholars as well as an increasing number of students who have produced studies in the US, UK, Canadian, Australian, Japanese, Chinese, German, and Dutch contexts, amongst others. Yet, the PM has also been marginalised in media and communication scholarship, largely due to the fact that the PM"s radical scholarly outlook challenges the liberal and conservative underpinnings of mainstream schools of thought in capitalist democracies. This paper brings together, for the first time, leading scholars to discuss important questions pertaining to the PM"s origins, public relevance, connections to other approaches within Communication Studies and Cultural Studies, applicability in the social media age, as well as impact and influence. The paper aligns with the 30th anniversary of the PM and the publication of the collected volume, The Propaganda Model Today, and highlights the PM"s continued relevance at a time of unprecedented corporate consolidation of the media, extreme levels of inequality and class conflict as well as emergence of new forms of authoritarianism.