Suchergebnisse

The purpose of the article is to reveal the essence of research and educational strategies as factors of cultural innovation by analysing the practical experience of research and educational institutions of the United Kingdom. The methodology of the study is to use a systematic approach to determine the systemic vision of cultural innovation by different institutions of the United Kingdom. The main research methods are: comparative method – for a comparative analysis of institutional development approaches, concepts of research projects and educational programmes; structural and typological method – to identify the features of the institutional system and identify its typological features; method of semiotic analysis – to interpret the content of cultural projects and art educational programmes as sign systems in the cultural space; method of theoretical generalisation – to summarise the research results. The scientific novelty lies in the generalisation of the experience of government institutions (Ministry of Culture, Media and Sport, Arts Council England), research institutions (Research and Innovation, Arts and Humanities Research Council) and educational institutions (King's College London, Kingston University School of Art, College of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Lincoln) of the United Kingdom aimed at developing research programmes, projects, determining their priorities and funding conditions as substantive components of promising research. Conclusions. The strategic priorities that ensure the development of cultural innovations are research and development of the latest technologies, including artificial intelligence, immersive technologies in art, virtual, augmented and mixed reality, digital culture, and integration of their results in the cultural industries. Educational strategies are characterised by interdisciplinarity, focus on digital humanities, visual arts, media, and creative industries. This makes it possible to overcome traditional disciplinary boundaries, create new specialisations, and use the potential of art to solve complex real-world problems and achieve real socially significant change.

This paper examines the phenomenon of "sixties" in Ukrainian culture of the second half of the twentieth century. It is shown that the study indicated the phenomenon is relevant based on interdisciplinarity by bringing conceptual provisions anthropological paradigm as a methodological tool of cultural knowledge. Based on the conceptual provisions that the key figure of history is the man, whose role permeates all historical and cultural fabric of social, civic and historical processes, the article proved that the disclosure of their content becomes productive from the standpoint of life conflicts and perceptions of specific individuals of certain historical era . Therefore, it is ananthropological dimension of research historical and cultural processes involved was to cover the period of the spiritual life of contemporary Ukrainian society, called "Khrushchev thaw".The second half of the twentieth century Ukrainian history and culture is difficult and ambiguous stage, characterized by its polar perception of events and processes. The liberalization of both public and political life, as well as brief purification of society from the effects of "personality cult" has provided opportunities for creative expression intelligentsia that has created a unique phenomenon of "sixties" – a powerful intellectual and creative movement, which was designed on the philosophy, literature, journalism, science, painting, music, cinema, art song and others. Against the background of the aforementioned processes in Ukraine, a new galaxy of creative and scientific intelligentsia, that started the revival of interrupted cultural traditions of modernist 20-ies of the 20th century and laid the foundation for the formation of national cultural trends in the development of Ukrainian culture 60-ies of the 20th century. This generation of young people – poets, writers, critics, translators, artists, scientists, students, workers of different beliefs and attitudes that began his career on the verge of 50-60's. Immediately attracted the attention of not only talent, but also courageous citizenship and national dignity.In culture and art in the study period according to modern art O. Coast, there were two opposing trends. First, the progressive trend, there was an attempt to overcome dogmatism, expanding creative possibilities artists. Significantly weakened the ideological grip of socialist method, arts symbolizes the protest against the leveling of personality, which was cultivated by the totalitarian regime. Many works of artists problem as "man-present", "artist and Government" settled in the intellectual and spiritual plane. Second, conservative, trend Culture 1960 was in keeping Stalinist methods of ideological pressure on intellectuals. Questions of culture and art Khrushchev personally supervised. His statements and actions were often contradictory. During his leadership, the country was made a lot of shameful failures.Against the background of the new socio-political situation in the territory of Ukrainian culture in the second half of the twentieth century began the processes associated with the formation of powerful active intellectually creative and democratic national movements. They were a manifestation of the transformation in the scientific, cultural, artistic and political life of Ukrainian society. Among them are the following: innovation philosophers in the sixties philosophical knowledge, appeals artists writers, musicians, and artists to the sources of national culture, the deployment of legal opposition to the totalitarian regime of the sixties dissidents.An outstanding phenomenon scholarship Ukraine 60-ies of the 20th century. Kiev became a philosophical school. Its formation is associated with the activities and work of outstanding scientist Paul Kopnin. Jesus and the Institute of Philosophy was implemented a broad, innovative research program forms and principles of scientific knowledge, rethinking of key categories of scientific knowledge "problem", "idea", "hypothesis", "theory", "scientific research" and so on. Philosophical achievement P. Kopnin and his school received recognition not only in the USSR, but also beyond.The defining feature of Ukrainian cultural space activities of Ukrainian patriots was the sixties. Among the most notable figures of the national cultural and political resistance movement is I .Dziuba, I .Drach, M. Vingranovsky, I. Svitlychny, E. Sverstyuk, V. Stus, V. Symonenko, L. Kostenko, V. Chornovil, V. Shevchuk and many others. They tried to stop the policy of total Russification, Ukrainian national consciousness to deepen, broaden the national-political and cultural rights of the Ukrainian people.The leading activity in the sixties is a cultural trend. Its representatives – artists A. Horska, I. Honchar, P. Zalyvakha, V. Zaretsky, L. Semykina, G. Sevruk and artists Kyiv, Kharkiv, Odesa, Lviv and other cities of Ukraine. They developed folklore and ethnographic motifs, symbols and historical poetics, created a series of portraits of contemporaries, increased interest in art 1920-1930's.The second half of the 60-ies of the 20th century actually stopped the development of a viable branch of Ukrainian culture, nurtured by "the Sixties". However, a few years talented young people, as part of a totalitarian culture, has formed its alternative – the culture of national revival and independence. ; В статье исследуется феномен "шестидесятничества" в украинской культуре второй половины ХХ века. Обоснована целесообразность изучения указанного явления в рамках антропологической парадигмы как методологического инструментария культурологического знания. Рассмотрены ведущие направления интеллектуальных и творческих поисков украинских философов-шестидесятников, художников, представителей национально-демократических движений, деятельность которых стала основой формирования ценностных основ и смысловых ориентиров украинской интеллигенции в период "хрущевской оттепели". ; У статті досліджено феномен "шістдесятництва" в українській культурі другої половини ХХ ст. Обгрунтовано необхідність вивчення зазначеного явища на основі залучення антропологічної парадигми як методологічного інструментарію культурологічного знання. Висвітлено напрями інтелектуальних та творчих пошуків українських філософів-шістдесятників, митців, представників національно-демократичних рухів, діяльність яких стала основою формування ціннісних засад та смислових орієнтирів української інтелігенції у період "хрущовської відлиги"