Thatcher's progress: from social democracy to market liberalism through an English new town
In: Modern British histories
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Modern British histories
In: Modern British histories
During the quarter of a century after the Second World War, the United Kingdom designated thirty-two new towns across England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Why, even before selling council houses or denationalising public industries, did Margaret Thatcher's government begin to privatise these new towns? By examining the most ambitious of these projects, Milton Keynes, Guy Ortolano recasts our understanding of British social democracy, arguing that the new towns comprised the spatial dimension of the welfare state. Following the Prime Minister's progress on a tour through Milton Keynes on 25 September 1979, Ortolano alights at successive stops to examine the broader histories of urban planning, modernist architecture, community development, international consulting, and municipal housing. Thatcher's journey reveals a dynamic social democracy during its decade of crisis, while also showing how public sector actors begrudgingly accommodated the alternative priorities of market liberalism.
C.P. Snow and the technocratic liberalism -- F.R. Leavis and the radical liberalism -- A tale of two colleges -- The making of English social history -- The rise of national 'decline' -- Post-colonial developments -- The eclipse of the meritocratic moment
In: Urban history, Band 48, Heft 1, S. 194-196
ISSN: 1469-8706
In: Journal of contemporary history, Band 55, Heft 4, S. 936-938
ISSN: 1461-7250
In: Modern intellectual history: MIH, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 657-684
ISSN: 1479-2451
Walt Rostow wanted his landmark contribution to modernization theory,The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-communist Manifesto(1960), to offer an alternative to Marxist analysis, and in service of that effort he sought to replace class with nation as the agent of history. Britain figured prominently in the resulting account, functioning as everything from a trailblazing pioneer to an idiosyncratic anomaly to a cautionary tale for weak-kneed Americans, but it never explicitly offered the model for other nations to follow that historians today associate with the text. In explaining how that misreading came to dominate discussions ofStages, this essay rethinks a US historiography that collapses modernization theory with American exceptionalism, and a UK historiography premised on the claim that Britain made the modern world. Attending to the function of Britain inStagesreinserts British history into postwar conceptions of world history—not as a paradigmatic case, but nevertheless as a significant one.