Suchergebnisse

Imaginative writers capture the vicissitudes, vagaries, failures and successes of the society in which they are produced faster than historians do. A great deal of fictional works have been produced that analyse the causes, manifestations and effects of the Zimbabwean crisis on their politics. One side effect of the crisis that some artists have grappled with is the 'Look East Policy' promulgated by Robert Mugabe in 2005. This was a policy shift necessitated by the break down in relations between Zimbabwe and most of the Western countries because of deficits in governance, human rights democracy and the inauguration of the politics of coercion. Due to the fact that the policy was foisted on Zimbabwe by circumstances that leadership did not foresee, it was replete with abuses of labour laws, extraction of mineral resources, and the flooding of cheap goods to the detriment of local industries and its people. In this research paper, we argue that though there could have been positive spinoffs to the policy, writers who have so far analysed this policy see it as skewed in the sense that China seems to be benefiting more than Zimbabwe is. We argue that friendship with China is a form of latter day colonialism and was motivated less by national interests than by the fact that Zimbabwe found herself in a cul de sac. To the extent that Zimbabwe was forced to look in one direction for political and economic succour, she was forced to look least among the community of nations that used to respect her. This is why there is talk in the country about engaging the West again. The research limits itself to the analysis of fictional works, which are still few, that narrativise the reality of Chinese investment in Zimbabwe. We use No Violet Bulawayo's We Need new Names, Gappah's An Elegy for Easterly, Eppel's White Man Crawling and his poem 'Ghostly Galleon'. We conclude that modern-day foreign policy is never to look south, east, west or north, but realise that there are no permanent friends anywhere, only interests. We argue ...