U.S. position on law of the sea reviewed
In: The Department of State bulletin: the official weekly record of United States Foreign Policy, Band 70, Heft 1816, S. 397-402
ISSN: 0041-7610
Offizieller Standpunkt von Staaten/Staatengruppen
100 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Department of State bulletin: the official weekly record of United States Foreign Policy, Band 70, Heft 1816, S. 397-402
ISSN: 0041-7610
Offizieller Standpunkt von Staaten/Staatengruppen
World Affairs Online
The Struggle for Law in the Oceans argues that by following a misleading isolationist narrative and not acceding to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the United States has harmed and continues to harm its interests. The book makes a compelling case for acceding to UNCLOS at the earliest opportunity.
In: Oxford scholarship online
'The Struggle for Law in the Oceans' argues that by following a misleading isolationist narrative and not acceding to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the United States has harmed and continues to harm its interests. The book makes a compelling case for acceding to UNCLOS at the earliest opportunity.
In: Princeton Legacy Library
John Norton Moore, the most prominent legal scholar to defend a position basically in agreement with the present Administration, presents a coherent, well-argued interpretation of the specific legal issues raised by U.S. involvement in Vietnam and their implications for international and constitutional law.Originally published in 1972.The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These paperback editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905
In: Sokol Colloquium v. 5
In: Sokol Colloquium
Preliminary Material -- The Role of Courts in Foreign Affairs /Royce C. Lamberth -- Policy Options for the Obama Administration: Enforcement Provisions of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act as a Tool Against State Sponsors of Terrorism /Steven R. Perles and Edward B. MacAllister -- Adjudicating Acts of State /Chimène I. Keitner -- Sovereign Immunity and the International Court of Justice: The State System Triumphant /Paul B. Stephan -- Non-State Actors and the Alien Tort Claims Act /Ralph Steinhardt -- Equity, Damages and the Rule of Law /Baher Azmy -- The Act of State Doctrine in Recent "Looted" Art Litigation /Allan Gerson -- Foreign Affairs Takings: The Question of Foreign Plaintiff Standing /Douglas J. Pepe -- The Work of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States /Timothy J. Feighery -- Lawsuits by Foreigners in the U.S. Courts and in the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission /Allan I. Mendelsohn -- International Claims and the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission /David E. Bradley -- The Future of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission Rests with the Modernization of Its Jurisprudence: The Regrettable Results Arising from an Intersection between the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission and the U.S. Insurance Industry, a Case Study /Steven R. Perles and Edward B. MacAllister -- The 2005 Hague Choice of Court Agreements Convention: A Useful Tool for the Transnational Litigator /David P. Stewart.
In: International law studies 68
In: The Arab-Israeli conflict 4,2
In: The Arab-Israeli conflict 4,1
World Affairs Online