Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Title Page -- Copyright -- Contents -- Acronyms -- Introduction -- 1. Democracy as a State of Mind -- 2. Militarizing Democracy -- 3. The San Francisco Peace Treaty -- 4. Bloody Sunagawa -- 5. A Breaking Point -- 6. Producing Democracy -- Conclusion -- Abbreviations -- Notes -- Acknowledgments -- Index

During the occupation American policymakers identified elections and education as the wellsprings of a democratic consciousness in Japan. But as the extent of Japan's economic recovery became clear, they placed prosperity at the core of a revised vision for their new ally's future, as Jennifer Miller shows in this fresh appraisal of the Cold War

This article explores the influence of East Asia's economic growth on the evolution of American neoconservative thought in the 1970s and 1980s. It traces how prominent neoconservative thinkers—Nathan Glazer, Peter L. Berger, Herman Kahn, Michael Novak, and Lawrence E. Harrison—developed the claim that the region's prosperity stemmed from its alleged Confucian tradition. Drawing in part from East Asian leaders and scholars, they argued that the region's growth demonstrated that tradition had facilitated, rather than hampered, the development of a distinct East Asian capitalist modernity. The article argues that this Confucian thesis helped American neoconservatives articulate their conviction that "natural" social hierarchies, religious commitment, and traditional families were necessary for healthy and free capitalist societies. It then charts how neoconservatives mobilized this interpretation of Confucian East Asia against postcolonial critiques of capitalism, especially dependency theory. East Asia, they claimed, demonstrated that poverty and wealth were determined not by patterns of welfare, structural exploitation, or foreign assistance, but values and culture. The concept of Confucian capitalism, the article shows, was central to neoconservatives' broad ideological agenda of protecting political, economic, and racial inequality under the guise of values, culture, and tradition.

This article explores the central role of Japan's rise to global economic prominence in the evolution of Donald J. Trump's worldview. It traces how the transformation of the relationship between the United States and Japan during the 1980s informed Trump's ideas about trade and protectionism, globalization, the international economy, and executive power. Trump, it argues, was a product of U.S.-Japanese relationship; while he began his public career as a prominent critic of Japan, claiming that the country exploited American trade and defense policy, his career in real estate heavily relied on Japanese finance. This contradictory approach continues to shape his understanding of Japan. As president, Trump repeatedly condemns Japan as predatory and protectionist, but also seeks expanded Japanese investment in the United States to revitalize the U.S. economy. Equally important, Trump has expanded criticisms originating with Japan to countries like China and Mexico, international agreements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the North American Free Trade Agreement, and the World Trade Organization. By tracing Trump's rhetorical, financial, and diplomatic encounters with Japan over the past thirty years, this article uncovers the sources of Trump's contradictory attitudes towards trade, globalization, and cross-border investment and his understandings of strong leadership and executive power.

The Cold War brought forth an unprecedented level of global interactions, creating relationships that not only brought states together but altered the trajectories of societies. To explore the impact of the Cold War on postwar Japan, this article examines the negotiations between the United States and Japan over Japanese membership in the Mutual Security Program, the United States' postwar military assistance program. It considers debates over Japanese rearmament and their effect on Japan's economy and democracy, both within Japan and between Japan and the United States, the negotiations that resulted in Japan's membership in the program, and Japanese reactions to this membership. It argues that Japanese rearmament both brought the United States and Japan together, and created tensions between them, highlighting the complicated Cold War dynamics between domestic and international politics. Further, it asserts that the Cold War altered the nature of the state by fostering a multilayered relationship between government policy-making, international negotiations, institutional developments, and socio-political mobilizations, creating a new political relationship that it calls the Cold War State.

Introduction -- North and South -- Taejon -- Inchon -- Pows -- Yalu river -- Chosin -- Hungnam -- Heartbreak -- Jets -- United Nations -- Night patrol -- Swift care -- Armistice -- Big switch -- Epilogue: Father and Son