Search results

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this record ; Pharmaceutical pollutants have become a worldwide concern. These emerging contaminants (ECs) are ubiquitously found in different water streams with concentrations above ecotoxicity endpoints, deteriorating aquatic life and water quality. This study evaluated extensively the efficacy of porous graphene (PG) synthesised at relatively low temperature as a potential candidate for the removal of six widely utilised pharmaceuticals from their aqueous solutions, such as atenolol (ATL), carbamazepine (CBZ), ciprofloxacin (CIP), diclofenac (DCF), gemfibrozil (GEM) and ibuprofen (IBP). Detailed batch tests were conducted to investigate the effects of adsorption time, initial EC concentration, PG dosage, solution pH, and temperature. Treatment efficiencies of ECs removal by PG were compared with those removed by carbonaceous counterparts (graphene oxide and graphite). Mixed solutions of these ECs were treated in different water bodies to test PG as a tertiary treatment option. The mechanism of adsorption was explored via thermodynamic studies, adsorption kinetics, and isotherm modelling, and characterisation of PG sorbent before and after ECs adsorption using TEM, SEM-EDS, XRD, FT-IR, Raman spectroscopy and other analyses. The results revealed fast kinetics and adsorption capacities exceeding 100 mg-EC/g-PG for some of ECs, and high removal efficiencies for trace concentrations of ECs (>99%) at a low dose of PG (100 mg/L). Removal efficiencies of mixed ECs in water and wastewater samples suffered from negative interferences, which can be mitigated by increasing the PG dosage. Adsorption processes were heterogeneous and controlled by physisorption. Further results showed the exothermic nature of the enthalpy-driven adsorption process and the recyclability potential of PG. It can be considered that PG could be used as a promising candidate for efficient treatment of water contaminated with ECs related to the pharmaceutical group. ; Department of Science and Technology, Government of India ; Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

Future scenarios provide challenging, plausible and relevant stories about how the future could unfold. Urban Futures (UF) research has identified a substantial set (>450) of seemingly disparate scenarios published over the period 1997–2011 and within this research, a sub-set of >160 scenarios has been identified (and categorized) based on their narratives according to the structure first proposed by the Global Scenario Group (GSG) in 1997; three world types (Business as Usual, Barbarization, and Great Transitions) and six scenarios, two for each world type (Policy Reform—PR, Market Forces—MF, Breakdown—B, Fortress World—FW, Eco-Communalism—EC and New Sustainability Paradigm—NSP). It is suggested that four of these scenario archetypes (MF, PR, NSP and FW) are sufficiently distinct to facilitate active stakeholder engagement in futures thinking. Moreover they are accompanied by a well-established, internally consistent set of narratives that provide a deeper understanding of the key fundamental drivers (e.g., STEEP—Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental and Political) that could bring about realistic world changes through a push or a pull effect. This is testament to the original concept of the GSG scenarios and their development and refinement over a 16 year period."