The Influence of the European Court of Human Rights on the Behavior of National Courts in Terrorism and National Security Cases: A Case Study of Supreme Courts in Denmark, the U.K., and Spain
In: APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Politics & policy, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 265-288
ISSN: 1747-1346
This article examines opinion dynamics on the complicated public policy issue of Electoral College reform. The study shows how partisan perceptions and political sophistication affect opinion on Electoral College reform. Taking advantage of an experiment and of an analysis of polls after the 2000 election, this study finds that those with higher levels of political sophistication were more likely to oppose reform. Proponents of reform often rely on simple majoritarian arguments while those opposed to reform are forced to justify the Electoral College based on more complicated arguments involving federalism and support for the two‐party system. Those with higher levels of political sophistication were more likely to understand, and hence accept, difficult arguments made by opponents of reform. Partisanship also played an important influence in shaping attitudes toward the Electoral College.
In: American politics research, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 216-245
ISSN: 1552-3373
Given people's interest in all things California, the novelty of the recall mechanism, and the presence of a bona fide action hero in the race, it is not surprising that the 2003 California recall election attracted an inordinate amount of national attention. The circus-like atmosphere should not, however, obscure the interesting implications of the recall election for our understanding of the broader phenomenon of strategic voting. We argue that partisans faced two different strategic voting scenarios in California, with Democrats confronting a slightly more subtle set of criteria and circumstances than Republicans. Drawing on individual-level survey data designed to gauge candidate affect and second-choice preferences, we find that strategic voting was common (although by no means unanimous) among those whose preferences placed them in a position to cast such a strategic vote.
In: American politics research, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 216-245
ISSN: 1532-673X
In: American review of politics, Band 33, S. 295-321
ISSN: 1051-5054
Drawing on a 2009 statewide telephone poll of registered voters in Texas, this study investigates how voters react to politicized campaigning, judicial experience and partisan cues when voting for judge. We analyze individual-level data by employing an experimental design in which respondents were provided information about a hypothetical judicial candidate (varying in both campaign theme and in partisanship) and then asked about the likelihood of voting for that candidate. We found that in a partisan election state such as Texas, individuals rely heavily on party as a shortcut when evaluating judicial candidates, even when accounting for judicial experience. We also found that respondents with greater levels of political sophistication were more likely to be influenced by a candidate's issue position on frivolous lawsuits. Adapted from the source document.
In: American review of politics, Band 33, Heft Fall Winter, S. 295-322
ISSN: 1051-5054
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Acronyms -- Prologue: Scope and Methods -- Introduction. The Prequel: Unequal Representation -- 1. Entering the Thicket: 1965 -- 2. Legislating in the Thicket -- 3. Litigating Texas Redistricting: A Democratic Lawyer's Experience -- 4. Texas Redistricting: A Republican Lawyer's Perspective -- 5. The Voting Rights Organizers -- 6. Analyzing Redistricting Outcomes -- Conclusion. Redistricting Redux: 2011 and Beyond -- Epilogue: Navigating the Brambles of the Political Thicket -- Notes -- Sources -- About the Contributors -- Index