KICKING AND SCREAMING ALL THE WAY TO THE GALLOWS - Susanne Sreedhar: Hobbes on Resistance: Defying the Leviathan. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. 183. $85.00.)
In: The review of politics, Band 74, Heft 1, S. 139-142
ISSN: 1748-6858
22 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The review of politics, Band 74, Heft 1, S. 139-142
ISSN: 1748-6858
In: The review of politics, Band 74, Heft 1, S. 139-142
ISSN: 0034-6705
In: Perspectives on political science, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 46-52
ISSN: 1045-7097
In: Perspectives on political science, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 46-51
ISSN: 1930-5478
In: Perspectives on political science, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 99-108
ISSN: 1930-5478
In: Perspectives on political science, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 99-108
ISSN: 1045-7097
Thomas Hobbes argues that the fear of violent death is the most reliable passion on which to found political society. His role in shaping the contemporary view of religion and honor in the West is pivotal, yet his ideas are famously riddled with contradictions. In this breakthrough study, McClure finds evidence that Hobbes' apparent inconsistencies are intentional, part of a sophisticated rhetorical strategy meant to make man more afraid of death than he naturally is. Hobbes subtly undermined two of the most powerful manifestations of man's desire for immortality: the religious belief in an afterlife and the secular desire for eternal fame through honor. McClure argues that Hobbes purposefully stirred up controversy, provoking his adversaries into attacking him and unwittingly spreading his message. This study will appeal to scholars of Hobbes, political theorists, historians of early modern political thought and anyone interested in the genesis of modern Western attitudes toward mortality.
Thomas Hobbes argues that the fear of violent death is the most reliable passion on which to found political society. His role in shaping the contemporary view of religion and honor in the West is pivotal, yet his ideas are famously riddled with contradictions. In this breakthrough study, McClure finds evidence that Hobbes' apparent inconsistencies are intentional, part of a sophisticated rhetorical strategy meant to make man more afraid of death than he naturally is. Hobbes subtly undermined two of the most powerful manifestations of man's desire for immortality: the religious belief in an afterlife and the secular desire for eternal fame through honor. McClure argues that Hobbes purposefully stirred up controversy, provoking his adversaries into attacking him and unwittingly spreading his message. This study will appeal to scholars of Hobbes, political theorists, historians of early modern political thought and anyone interested in the genesis of modern Western attitudes toward mortality
In: The review of politics, Band 76, Heft 1, S. 69-92
ISSN: 1748-6858
AbstractBenjamin Franklin divides the mistakes he lists in theAutobiographyinto "errata" and "great errata." He derived no benefit from the latter, but some benefit from the former. Examining Franklin's regret, or lack of regret, at these errata opens a window onto Franklin's understanding of morality. The laxity in his list of virtues and his flexibility with regard to conventional morals stem from the insight Franklin tells us he gained from these errata. For Franklin, or at least his persona in theAutobiography, there was no conflict between egoism and altruism, and he is therefore the embodiment of a type of self-interest well understood. Tracing the story of the errata, which Franklin inserted into an earlier draft of the work's first part, and Franklin's later actions provides the key to understanding the rhetorical strategy of theAutobiography, and the reason he never wrote his proposedArt of Virtue.
In: The review of politics, Band 76, Heft 1, S. 69-92
ISSN: 0034-6705
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 76, Heft 1, S. 114-125
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 75, Heft 1, S. E1
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 76, Heft 1, S. 114-125
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: The review of politics, Band 73, Heft 1, S. 1-27
ISSN: 1748-6858
AbstractDespite his statements that the fear of damnation is greater than the fear of violent death, scholars have generally overlooked Hobbes's vision of hell. Hobbes's reinterpretation of hell is meant to redirect peoples' anxiety about whether they will get into heaven or hell into anxiety about whether there is a hell and if so, what it will be like. He did not expect that citizens of his state would accept his theology or that they would become secularists or atheists. He hoped that they would be left with an indeterminate belief they would be averse to examining. This becomes clear when Hobbes's theology is seen in light of his epistemology and his complex rhetorical strategy. Hobbes's theology has been rejected, but there is an affinity between his hopes for indeterminate belief and the religious attitudes of many in the West.
In: The review of politics, Band 73, Heft 1, S. 1-27
ISSN: 1748-6858
Despite his statements that the fear of damnation is greater than the fear of violent death, scholars have generally overlooked Hobbes's vision of hell. Hobbes's reinterpretation of hell is meant to redirect peoples' anxiety about whether they will get into heaven or hell into anxiety about whether there is a hell and if so, what it will be like. He did not expect that citizens of his state would accept his theology or that they would become secularists or atheists. He hoped that they would be left with an indeterminate belief they would be averse to examining. This becomes clear when Hobbes's theology is seen in light of his epistemology and his complex rhetorical strategy. Hobbes's theology has been rejected, but there is an affinity between his hopes for indeterminate belief and the religious attitudes of many in the West. Adapted from the source document.