Suchergebnisse

Developing countries have much greater leverage in the Doha Round negotiations, due at least in part to their large and growing share of world trade. Nonetheless, it remains to be seen whether this influence will be translated into a final agreement that is truly more development-friendly. This volume takes up select issues of importance to developing countries, including the implications of the concept of the "multifunctionality" of agriculture, the impact on market access of sanitary and phytosanitary regulations, the role of special and differential treatment for developing countr

A study to test the hypothesis that the 'agricultural research establishment' is a set of loosely related organizations-some complementary, some competitive-which are complexly intermingled with the 'publics' they serve. Agricultural research has its origins in two acts of Congress passed in 1862: (1) The Morrill Act which established state land grant Us, & (2) the act which established the Dept of Agriculture. Since that time, the principal actors in agricultural research have been (A) the funder of research, eg, federal & state governments, private industry, & foundations, (B) the spenders & brokers of research funds, eg, the National Science Foundation, U, & private research firms, & (C) the network of public & private organizations which have interests in agricultural research. The result of this morass of competitive components is a disjointed whole influenced by myriad special interest groups. Instead of a unified program among related organizations, annual budget matters are influenced at the macro & project levels while 'the bureaucratic superstructure which separates the two levels goes along unchanged. As such, the establishment is largely impervious to political manipulation in the short run. At the same time as the totality of the establishment is politically protected, specific interest can materially influence micro priorities which over time slowly alter the total.' M. Cain.

Agricultural trade, always a source of international friction, will remain a contentious issue in the years to come. The GATT agreement achieved only partial trade liberalization; recognizing this, the agreement calls for a continuation of the negotiation process to achieve the long-run goal of a substantial reduction in agricultural support and protection. In any case, it is clear that U.S.-European Union (EU) agricultural trade relations will remain central to any future negotiation. In this volume, leading experts present a comprehensive set of analyses of the U.S.-EU agricultural trade conflict. The discussions provide a unique perspective on the U.S.-EU agricultural trade confrontation in recent years and offer insights into both the final GATT agreement and forthcoming agricultural issues. Presenting a broad historical context, the book focuses on changes in U.S. and European trade and agricultural policies, looking at the implications of these changes for bilateral relations and global agricultural markets. Providing U.S., EU, and third-party perspectives, the contributors analyze the negotiation process in the Uruguay Round of the GATT. Finally, the book explores several additional dimensions of the U.S.-EU agricultural trade conflict, including the consequences of the EU integration and enlargement processes, the environmental impact of the Union's agricultural policies, and the mechanisms and forces that determine agricultural policy formation in both the United States and in Europe

Cover title. ; "Prepared under Research Agreement #58-3522-4-00299"--P. iii. ; "January 1991"--P. iii. ; Includes bibliographical references (p. 51-73). ; Mode of access: Internet.