Suchergebnisse

El presente trabajo se orienta a desarrollar el criterio aplicado por los romanos con relación a las donaciones y mostrar como Vélez Sarsfield al legislar lo hizo junto a los contratos, ya que las entendía como tales, decisión que las descartaba de la parte correspondiente a las disposiciones de última voluntad como los testamentos. Siguió el criterio del Derecho Romano, alejándose del pensamiento del Derecho Francés, que las reglamentaron bajo un título común. El mismo criterio es seguido por el actual Código, el cual reformula la definición del contrato, remarcando la naturaleza jurídica de la donación como contrato. La diferencia de criterio que se encuentra en el nuevo Código con relación al Derecho Romano y lo fijado por Vélez es que se permite las donaciones entre cónyuges, y la opción de separación de bienes. Para una mayor comprensión de las donaciones, pasamos a un desarrollo histórico de su concepción. ; The present work is oriented to develop the criterion applied by the Romansin relation to the donations as well as to show how Velez Sarsfieldincluded them amongthe contracts, since he understood them like that. This decision resulted in removing the donations from the part corresponding to the last will dispositions such as the testaments. By doing this, he followedthe criterion of the Roman Law, moving away from the French Law,that regulated them under a common title. The same criterion is followed by the current Code, which recasts the definition of the contract, stressing the legal nature of thedonation as one of them. The difference of criterion found in the new Code in comparison withthe Roman law and what was legislated by Vélez, consists in that donations are allowed between spousesand in the option of separation of goods. For a greater understanding of the donations,we move to a historical development of its conception. ; Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Customers in the US and Canada please order from Stanford University Press at (800) 621-2736 or visit their website at www.sup.org. In this book, ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) draws upon the Latin American and Caribbean region's experience in order to formulate a historical and multidimensional assessment of the globalization process from the perspectives of developing countries. In view of the glaring contrast between increasingly global problems and the incomplete, asymmetrical nature of the international agenda for dealing with them, developing countries ne

Most of the evidence on dynamic equilibrium exchange rate models is based on seasonally adjusted consumption data. Equilibrium models have not worked well in explaining the actual exchange rate. However, the use of seasonally adjusted data might be responsible for the spurious rejection of the model. This paper presents a new equilibrium model for the exchange rates that incorporates seasonal preferences. The fit of the model to the data is evaluated for five industrialized countries using seasonally unadjusted data. Our findings indicate that a model with seasonal preferences can generate monthly time series of the exchange rate without seasonality even when the variables that theoretically determine the exchange rate show clear seasonal behaviours. Further, the model can generate theoretical exchange rates with the same order of integration than actual exchange rates, and in some cases, with the same stochastic trend.