Suchergebnisse

Background Findings are presented from the evaluation of Public Health England's (PHE) Prioritization Framework (PF) aimed to assist local authority commissioners with their public health investment and disinvestment decisions. The study explored the take up of the PF in three early adopter local authority settings. Methods Semi-structured interviews (n = 30) across three local authorities supplemented by participant observation of workshops. Results Participants acknowledged that the PF provided a systematic means of guiding priority-setting and one that encouraged transparency over investment and disinvestment decisions. The role performed by PHE and its regional teams in facilitating the process was especially welcomed and considered critical to the adoption process. However, uptake of the PF required a significant investment of time and commitment from public health teams at a time when resources were stretched. The impact of the political environment in the local government was a major factor determining the likely uptake of the PF. Ensuring committed leadership and engagement from senior politicians and officers was regarded as critical to success. Conclusions The study assessed the value and impact of PHE's PF tool in three early adopter local authorities. Further research could explore the value of the tool in aiding investment and disinvestment decisions and its impact on spending.

Evidence suggests that mental health interventions are more effective when they consider the whole context of schools; addressing the needs of all students, their families, and staff; otherwise known as a whole-school approach (WSA). The UK Government is piloting WSAs to transform mental health and wellbeing by locating educational mental health practitioners in educational settings across England. This study aims to develop a 'bottom-up' understanding of the contextual factors and mechanisms that underlie WSAs in Trailblazer schools in the North East and North Cumbria, to gain insight into the facilitators and barriers of delivering a WSA, and optimal evaluation methods. To undertake a realist evaluation, we included the generation of initial programme theories from existing academic literature and policy documents; 'theory gleaning' interviews with NHS/local authority stakeholders, Trailblazer staff and school senior leaders; refining and development of theories; and individual interviews and focus groups with pupils, parent/carers and school staff. The findings will enable Trailblazer partners to better understand how their WSAs to mental health contain the essential components for transformation in schools in the region. This will contribute to the embedding of continuous evaluation into regional Trailblazers' practice for participating schools, for subsequent annual waves and producing relevant findings for non-Trailblazer schools. Complementing the national evaluation of all 25 Wave 1 Trailblazer pilot sites, this study will generate an explanatory theoretical account of how to optimally design, implement and evaluate WSAs by exploring the contextual factors associated with implementation of WSAs.

Acknowledgements This research was supported by the Health Foundation Improvement Science Award (grant number: GIFTS ID 7223 awarded to SP). JMG holds a Canada Research Chair in Health Knowledge Transfer and Uptake. DK's work is carried out within the HOMING program of the Foundation for Polish Science co-financed by the European Union under the European Regional Development Fund; grant number POIR.04.04.00-00-5CF3/18-00; HOMING 5/2018. We would also like to thank Lauren Basey for optimising the design of our included figure. ; Peer reviewed ; Publisher PDF

Funding Information: This research was supported by the Health Foundation Improvement Science Award (grant number: GIFTS ID 7223 awarded to Sebastian Potthoff). Tracy Finch, Tim Rapley, Sebastian Potthoff, Tom Saunders and Luke Vale are members of the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria ( NIHR200173 ). Luke Vale is also a member of the NIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, NIHR School for Public Health Research, and Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health . The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care . Jeremy M. Grimshaw holds a Canada Research Chair in Health Knowledge Transfer and Uptake. Dominika Kwasnicka's work is carried out within the HOMING program of the Foundation for Polish Science co-financed by the European Union under the European Regional Development Fund ; grant number POIR.04.04.00-00-5CF3/18-00 ; HOMING 5/2018. We would also like to thank Lauren Basey for optimising the design of our included figure. Funding Information: This research was supported by the Health Foundation Improvement Science Award (grant number: GIFTS ID 7223 awarded to Sebastian Potthoff). Tracy Finch, Tim Rapley, Sebastian Potthoff, Tom Saunders and Luke Vale are members of the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria (NIHR200173). Luke Vale is also a member of the NIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, NIHR School for Public Health Research, and Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Jeremy M. Grimshaw holds a Canada Research Chair in Health Knowledge Transfer and Uptake. Dominika Kwasnicka's work is carried out within the HOMING program of the Foundation for Polish Science co-financed by the European Union under the European Regional Development Fund; grant number POIR.04.04.00-00-5CF3/18-00; ...

Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund Jüngste Analysen zeigen, dass Versorgungsorganisationen in der
Versorgungsforschung in Deutschland häufig in erster Linie als Studiensetting
betrachtet werden, ohne deren komplexen organisationalen Charakter in vollem
Umfang zu berücksichtigen, weder theoretisch noch methodisch. Daher wurde eine
Initiative gestartet, um den Stand der organisationsbezogenen
Versorgungsforschung (OVF) in Deutschland zu analysieren und einen strategischen
Rahmen und eine Roadmap zu entwickeln, die zukünftige Bemühungen in diesem
Bereich leiten können. Der vorliegende Artikel fasst Positionen zusammen, die
von wissenschaftlichen Expert*innen aus verschiedenen Disziplinen und Ländern
gemeinsam entwickelt wurden.
Methoden Im Juli 2023 wurde ein dreitägiger Scoping-Workshop mit 32
(inter)nationalen Expert*innen aus verschiedenen Forschungsbereichen mit Bezug
zu OVF-Themen unter Nutzung interaktiver Workshop-Methoden durchgeführt. Die
Teilnehmenden diskutierten ihre Perspektiven auf OVF, analysierten aktuelle
Herausforderungen in der OVF in Deutschland und entwickelten zentrale Positionen
für die Entwicklung des Forschungsbereichs.
Ergebnisse Die sieben zentralen Positionen betrafen sowohl konzeptuelle
als auch strategische Aspekte. Die Weiterentwicklung von OVF erfordert die
Entwicklung einer Forschungsagenda, die zukünftige Bemühungen leiten kann. Auf
konzeptueller Ebene müssen Herausforderungen in Bezug auf Interdisziplinarität,
Terminologie, Organisation(en) als Forschungsgegenstand, international
vergleichende Forschung und die Nutzung von Organisationstheorie adressiert
werden. Auf strategischer Ebene wurden Anforderungen an die Lehre, die Förderung
der interdisziplinären und internationalen Zusammenarbeit, geeignete
Finanzierungsmöglichkeiten und partizipative Forschung identifiziert.
Schlussfolgerung Das Positionspapier soll als Rahmen zur Unterstützung der
weiteren Entwicklung der OVF in Deutschland und als Leitfaden für Forscher*innen
und Förderorganisationen dienen, die die OVF voranbringen möchten. Einige der
für die deutsche OVF diskutierten Herausforderungen existieren auch in anderen
Ländern. Daher kann dieses Positionspapier genutzt werden, um fruchtbare
Diskussionen in anderen Ländern zu initiieren.