Contradictory intent? US federal legislation on integrating societal concerns into nanotechnology research and development
In: Science and public policy: journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 5-16
ISSN: 1471-5430
3 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Science and public policy: journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 5-16
ISSN: 1471-5430
In: Science & public policy: SPP ; journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 5-16
ISSN: 0302-3427, 0036-8245
In: Bulletin of science, technology & society, Band 26, Heft 6, S. 485-496
ISSN: 1552-4183
Public "upstream engagement" and other approaches to the social control of technology are currently receiving international attention in policy discourses around emerging technologies such as nanotechnology. To the extent that such approaches hold implications for research and development (R&D) activities, the distinct participation of scientists and engineers is required. The capacity of technoscientists to broaden the influences on R&D activities, however, implies that they conduct R&D differently. This article discusses the possibility for more reflexive participation by scientists and engineers in the internal governance of technology development. It reviews various historical attempts to govern technoscience and introduces the concept of midstream modulation, through which scientists and engineers, ideally in concert with others, bring societal considerations to bear on their work.